Re-Vision of History: Historiographic Metafiction in Kurt Vonnegut's Mother Night and Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
CEA CRITIC Pub Date : 2023-02-25 DOI:10.1353/cea.2023.0000
W. Clough, Wei Feng, Emily J. Pucker, Richard C. Raymond, D. Terry, Jeraldine R. Kraver, J. Ward, Hyun-Jo Yoo
{"title":"Re-Vision of History: Historiographic Metafiction in Kurt Vonnegut's Mother Night and Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children","authors":"W. Clough, Wei Feng, Emily J. Pucker, Richard C. Raymond, D. Terry, Jeraldine R. Kraver, J. Ward, Hyun-Jo Yoo","doi":"10.1353/cea.2023.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Rather than simply accept the \"official\" historical record, historiographic metafiction reexamines these records and events in showing different perspectives. This creates a dialogue between the text of the novel and the original texts of history, forcing the reader to examine more closely the texts being presented in both the \"official\" record and the novel. Two novels that operate along these lines are Kurt Vonnegut's Mother Night (1962), the supposed memoirs of an American who becomes a Nazi officer in Germany during World War II; and Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children (1981), a novel examining the interwoven histories of the narrator's family and events in the history of India, including independence from Great Britain and the Emergency period under Indira Gandhi. These texts experiment with history by examining how those histories are constructed as memoirs by their character authors as well as what they mean and communicate to their contemporary audiences. By examining the methods by which histories are created and what they communicate to their audiences, Mother Night and Midnight's Children speak directly to the levels of meaning and construction in the histories chosen for re-vision.","PeriodicalId":41558,"journal":{"name":"CEA CRITIC","volume":"85 1","pages":"1 - 113 - 114 - 115 - 13 - 14 - 30 - 31 - 38 - 39 - 57 - 58 - 83 - 84 - 86 - 87 - 88 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CEA CRITIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cea.2023.0000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Rather than simply accept the "official" historical record, historiographic metafiction reexamines these records and events in showing different perspectives. This creates a dialogue between the text of the novel and the original texts of history, forcing the reader to examine more closely the texts being presented in both the "official" record and the novel. Two novels that operate along these lines are Kurt Vonnegut's Mother Night (1962), the supposed memoirs of an American who becomes a Nazi officer in Germany during World War II; and Salman Rushdie's Midnight's Children (1981), a novel examining the interwoven histories of the narrator's family and events in the history of India, including independence from Great Britain and the Emergency period under Indira Gandhi. These texts experiment with history by examining how those histories are constructed as memoirs by their character authors as well as what they mean and communicate to their contemporary audiences. By examining the methods by which histories are created and what they communicate to their audiences, Mother Night and Midnight's Children speak directly to the levels of meaning and construction in the histories chosen for re-vision.
重新审视历史:冯内古特《母亲之夜》和拉什迪《午夜的孩子》中的历史元小说
摘要:元历史小说不是简单地接受“官方”的历史记录,而是以不同的视角重新审视这些记录和事件。这在小说文本和历史原始文本之间创造了一种对话,迫使读者更仔细地审视“官方”记录和小说中呈现的文本。有两部小说是这样运作的:库尔特·冯内古特(Kurt Vonnegut)的《母亲之夜》(Mother Night)(1962年),这是一部关于二战期间在德国成为纳粹军官的美国人的回忆录;萨尔曼·拉什迪(Salman Rushdie)的《午夜的孩子》(Midnight‘s Children)(1981),这部小说探讨了叙述者的家庭与印度历史上的事件交织在一起的历史,包括脱离英国独立和英迪拉·甘地(Indira Gandhi)领导下的紧急时期。这些文本通过研究这些历史是如何被其人物作者构建为回忆录的,以及它们的含义和对当代观众的交流,来对历史进行实验。《母亲之夜》和《午夜的孩子》通过研究创造历史的方法以及它们与观众交流的内容,直接谈到了为重新审视而选择的历史的意义和结构水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CEA CRITIC
CEA CRITIC LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信