{"title":"On Cracks, Lights and Environments","authors":"Tiina Paloniitty","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqad016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Participatory rights have been the focus of global attention in recent years, as people have fought over access to courts in all things climate-related. Access to information has gained lesser attention, though it is a pivotal first step in holding the decision-makers accountable. In his volume, Sean Whittaker offers the reader a bird’s-eye view on how this aim is conceptualised, understood and executed in three different jurisdictions—England and Wales, the USA and China. Using legal transplant theory prospectively, he explores the potential of each solution to serve as a provider or receiver of transplants. Whittaker’s clear analysis delivers on the calls of contingent and ambitious comparative environmental law scholarship. In carefully examining the substantive and procedural cores of the access to environmental information right, Whittaker explores the details of the right and, by doing so, also presents a fine-tuned understanding of the global normativity of the Aarhus Convention.","PeriodicalId":46437,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqad016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Participatory rights have been the focus of global attention in recent years, as people have fought over access to courts in all things climate-related. Access to information has gained lesser attention, though it is a pivotal first step in holding the decision-makers accountable. In his volume, Sean Whittaker offers the reader a bird’s-eye view on how this aim is conceptualised, understood and executed in three different jurisdictions—England and Wales, the USA and China. Using legal transplant theory prospectively, he explores the potential of each solution to serve as a provider or receiver of transplants. Whittaker’s clear analysis delivers on the calls of contingent and ambitious comparative environmental law scholarship. In carefully examining the substantive and procedural cores of the access to environmental information right, Whittaker explores the details of the right and, by doing so, also presents a fine-tuned understanding of the global normativity of the Aarhus Convention.
期刊介绍:
Condensing essential information into just three issues a year, the Journal of Environmental Law has become an authoritative source of informed analysis for all those who have any dealings in this vital field of legal study. It exists primarily for academics and legal practitioners, but should also prove accessible for all other groups concerned with the environment, from scientists to planners. The journal offers major articles on a wide variety of topics, refereed and written to the highest standards, providing innovative and authoritative appraisals of current and emerging concepts, policies, and practice. It includes: -An analysis section, providing detailed analysis of current case law and legislative and policy developments -An annual review of significant UK, European Court of Justice, and international law cases -A substantial book reviews section