Rise of social bots: The impact of social bots on public opinion dynamics in public health emergencies from an information ecology perspective

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Han Luo , Xiao Meng , Yifei Zhao , Meng Cai
{"title":"Rise of social bots: The impact of social bots on public opinion dynamics in public health emergencies from an information ecology perspective","authors":"Han Luo ,&nbsp;Xiao Meng ,&nbsp;Yifei Zhao ,&nbsp;Meng Cai","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Social bots exacerbate emotional chaos and network disorder during sudden public opinion outbreaks. Drawing on information ecology theory, we analyze how social bots as information person characteristics influence information characteristics represented by topic tendency and sentiment spreading and environmental characteristics represented by information diffusion and network influence, and further discuss the conditional role played by social bots in public opinion dynamics. By comparing different </span>machine learning<span><span> models, the study selects the XGBoost model with the highest accuracy to identify the type of social bots with specific automation features in the Chinese context. Meanwhile, based on the representative </span>public health emergency, the study uses a large-scale social media dataset (</span></span><em>N</em><span> = 328539) to explore how social bots affect multi-dimensional public opinion dynamics in the information ecosystem. It was found that the information published by social bots and human users has an entirely different dissemination mechanism, and social bots have a significant impact on topic tendency, sentiment spreading, information diffusion, and network influence in cyberspace. Moreover, social bots also play an important moderating role in the information diffusion and network influence of affective information. Relevant findings provide a practical reference for the recognition and prevention of social bots, and help emergency management departments to stabilize public sentiments by intervening in the behavior of social bots, weakening the influence of negative public opinion, and promoting the management of public opinions in emergencies and the maintenance of network order.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102051"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323001156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social bots exacerbate emotional chaos and network disorder during sudden public opinion outbreaks. Drawing on information ecology theory, we analyze how social bots as information person characteristics influence information characteristics represented by topic tendency and sentiment spreading and environmental characteristics represented by information diffusion and network influence, and further discuss the conditional role played by social bots in public opinion dynamics. By comparing different machine learning models, the study selects the XGBoost model with the highest accuracy to identify the type of social bots with specific automation features in the Chinese context. Meanwhile, based on the representative public health emergency, the study uses a large-scale social media dataset (N = 328539) to explore how social bots affect multi-dimensional public opinion dynamics in the information ecosystem. It was found that the information published by social bots and human users has an entirely different dissemination mechanism, and social bots have a significant impact on topic tendency, sentiment spreading, information diffusion, and network influence in cyberspace. Moreover, social bots also play an important moderating role in the information diffusion and network influence of affective information. Relevant findings provide a practical reference for the recognition and prevention of social bots, and help emergency management departments to stabilize public sentiments by intervening in the behavior of social bots, weakening the influence of negative public opinion, and promoting the management of public opinions in emergencies and the maintenance of network order.

社交机器人的兴起:信息生态学视角下突发公共卫生事件中社交机器人对舆情动态的影响
社交机器人在突发舆论爆发时加剧了情绪混乱和网络混乱。借鉴信息生态学理论,分析社交机器人作为信息人特征如何影响以话题倾向、情绪传播为代表的信息特征和以信息扩散、网络影响为代表的环境特征,并进一步探讨社交机器人在舆情动态中的条件作用。通过比较不同的机器学习模型,本研究选择了准确率最高的XGBoost模型来识别中国背景下具有特定自动化特征的社交机器人类型。同时,本研究基于具有代表性的突发公共卫生事件,使用大规模社交媒体数据集(N = 328539),探索社交机器人如何影响信息生态系统中多维度的民意动态。研究发现,社交机器人发布的信息与人类用户发布的信息具有完全不同的传播机制,社交机器人对网络空间的话题倾向、情绪传播、信息扩散和网络影响力具有显著影响。此外,社交机器人在情感信息的信息扩散和网络影响中也起着重要的调节作用。相关研究结果为识别和防范社交机器人提供了现实参考,有助于应急管理部门通过干预社交机器人行为,弱化负面舆论影响,促进突发事件舆情管理和网络秩序维护,稳定舆情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信