{"title":"Distance learning as emergency remote teaching vs. traditional learning for accounting students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Cross-country evidence","authors":"Ghassan H. Mardini, Osama A. Mah'd","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2022.100814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The main objective of the current study is to examine the perspectives of undergraduate accounting students on the transition to distance learning (DL) as emergency remote learning from traditional learning (TL) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the learning dimensions of DL compared to TL. The sample includes 782 responses from six countries (France, Jordan, Oman, Qatar, Tunisia, and the UK). In accordance with prior studies, we construct a questionnaire that explores the perceptions of students regarding the TL-to-DL transition process and the learning dimensions of DL vs. TL. The majority of respondents believe that the DL transition process, due to the pandemic, has generated concerns to some extent in all countries. However, in terms of the dimensions of DL vs. TL, significant differences exist between the perspectives among the countries, which provides insights regarding the pandemic’s effect on our educational systems and a more accurate picture of universities’ educational performance. Our results raise important questions regarding the TL system in place before the crisis, as well as highlighting the importance of using technology to deliver educational services. This study provides cross-country evidence, from the perspective both of developed and developing countries, on the impact of the pandemic on students’ learning habits and educational methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575122000483/pdfft?md5=cd1bb203ff6b648e634fb7002d038cbd&pid=1-s2.0-S0748575122000483-main.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575122000483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13
Abstract
The main objective of the current study is to examine the perspectives of undergraduate accounting students on the transition to distance learning (DL) as emergency remote learning from traditional learning (TL) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as the learning dimensions of DL compared to TL. The sample includes 782 responses from six countries (France, Jordan, Oman, Qatar, Tunisia, and the UK). In accordance with prior studies, we construct a questionnaire that explores the perceptions of students regarding the TL-to-DL transition process and the learning dimensions of DL vs. TL. The majority of respondents believe that the DL transition process, due to the pandemic, has generated concerns to some extent in all countries. However, in terms of the dimensions of DL vs. TL, significant differences exist between the perspectives among the countries, which provides insights regarding the pandemic’s effect on our educational systems and a more accurate picture of universities’ educational performance. Our results raise important questions regarding the TL system in place before the crisis, as well as highlighting the importance of using technology to deliver educational services. This study provides cross-country evidence, from the perspective both of developed and developing countries, on the impact of the pandemic on students’ learning habits and educational methods.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.