Quality Improvement Intervention associated with Improved Lung Protective Ventilation Settings in an Emergency Department

David H. Heimberg, Zachary Illg, W. Corser
{"title":"Quality Improvement Intervention associated with Improved Lung Protective Ventilation Settings in an Emergency Department","authors":"David H. Heimberg, Zachary Illg, W. Corser","doi":"10.51894/001c.29603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Patients requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in the emergency department (ED) are critically ill, and their ventilator management is crucial for their subsequent clinical outcomes. Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) setting strategies are key considerations for this care. The objectives of this 2019-2020 community-based quality improvement project were to: a) identify patients at greater risk of not receiving LPV, and b) evaluate the effectiveness of a series of brief quality improvement educational sessions to improve LPV setting protocol adherence rates. METHODS A 15-month retrospective chart review of ventilator settings and subject characteristics (N = 200) was conducted before and after a series of 10-15-minute educational sessions were delivered to improve LPV adherence. This information was presented at a series of four educational sessions for 25 attending physicians (n = two sessions) and 27 residents at conferences (n = two sessions). Two additional materials (e.g., LPV reference charts, tape measures to gauge patients’ heights) were also posted in three ED resuscitation rooms and on cabinets containing emergency airway equipment. The pre and post-intervention occurrence rates of LPV setting orders were inferentially compared before and after educational sessions. RESULTS Patients ventilated using LPV increased from 70% to 82% after the educational sessions (p = 0.04). All patients who were 67 inches or greater in height were ventilated appropriately before and after sessions. For patients under 65 inches in height, post-session LPV adherence increased from 13% to 53% (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, a brief ED provider educational intervention can significantly improve the utilization of LPV guideline-based settings. Patients under 65 inches in height may also be especially at risk of receiving non-LPV ventilator setting orders.","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.29603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Patients requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation in the emergency department (ED) are critically ill, and their ventilator management is crucial for their subsequent clinical outcomes. Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) setting strategies are key considerations for this care. The objectives of this 2019-2020 community-based quality improvement project were to: a) identify patients at greater risk of not receiving LPV, and b) evaluate the effectiveness of a series of brief quality improvement educational sessions to improve LPV setting protocol adherence rates. METHODS A 15-month retrospective chart review of ventilator settings and subject characteristics (N = 200) was conducted before and after a series of 10-15-minute educational sessions were delivered to improve LPV adherence. This information was presented at a series of four educational sessions for 25 attending physicians (n = two sessions) and 27 residents at conferences (n = two sessions). Two additional materials (e.g., LPV reference charts, tape measures to gauge patients’ heights) were also posted in three ED resuscitation rooms and on cabinets containing emergency airway equipment. The pre and post-intervention occurrence rates of LPV setting orders were inferentially compared before and after educational sessions. RESULTS Patients ventilated using LPV increased from 70% to 82% after the educational sessions (p = 0.04). All patients who were 67 inches or greater in height were ventilated appropriately before and after sessions. For patients under 65 inches in height, post-session LPV adherence increased from 13% to 53% (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, a brief ED provider educational intervention can significantly improve the utilization of LPV guideline-based settings. Patients under 65 inches in height may also be especially at risk of receiving non-LPV ventilator setting orders.
急诊部质量改善干预与改善肺保护通气设置相关
引言急诊科需要气管插管和机械通气的患者病情危重,他们的呼吸机管理对他们随后的临床结果至关重要。肺保护性通气(LPV)设置策略是该护理的关键考虑因素。该2019-2020年社区质量改进项目的目标是:a)确定未接受LPV风险更大的患者,以及b)评估一系列简短的质量改进教育课程的有效性,以提高LPV制定方案的遵守率。方法在进行一系列10-15分钟的教育课程以提高LPV依从性之前和之后,对呼吸机设置和受试者特征(N=200)进行为期15个月的回顾性图表审查。这些信息是在一系列四次教育会议上提供的,共有25名主治医生(n=两次会议)和27名住院医生参加会议(n=两场会议)。另外两份材料(如LPV参考图、测量患者身高的卷尺)也张贴在三个急诊复苏室和装有紧急气道设备的橱柜上。在教育课程前后,对干预前和干预后LPV设置顺序的发生率进行了推断比较。结果使用LPV通气的患者在教育课程后从70%增加到82%(p=0.04)。所有身高67英寸或以上的患者在课程前后都进行了适当的通气。对于身高低于65英寸的患者,疗程后LPV的依从性从13%增加到53%(p=0.01)。结论基于这些结果,ED提供者的简短教育干预可以显著提高基于LPV指南的设置的利用率。身高低于65英寸的患者也可能特别有接受非LPV呼吸机设置命令的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信