Characterization of a breakup in couples of university students: Differences in cognitive assessment of the event

Miriam Wendolyn Barajas Márquez, Cinthia Cruz del Castillo, Jaime Fuentes Balderrama
{"title":"Characterization of a breakup in couples of university students: Differences in cognitive assessment of the event","authors":"Miriam Wendolyn Barajas Márquez,&nbsp;Cinthia Cruz del Castillo,&nbsp;Jaime Fuentes Balderrama","doi":"10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this investigation was to analyze differences between young people who had a positive assessment of breakups and those who had a negative assessment, divided in turn by gender, in relation to the following variables: level of importance, level of commitment, duration of relationship, ways of loving, reasons for breaking up, coping styles, and level of depression resulting from the breakup. To that end, we conducted Student <em>t</em> tests with each of the variables involved. 326 university students age 17–26 (122 men and 204 women) who had recently gone through a breakup in their sentimental relationships participated in the study. Differences were found between women who assessed their breakups positively and those who assessed them negatively in relation to level of importance, level of commitment, duration of relationship, lack of sex drive, lack of commitment, rational incompatibility, in evasive coping styles, cognitive-reflexive analysis, ludic loving style, and total level of depression. In the case of men, differences were also found for level of importance, level of commitment, and coping styles: evasive, cognitive-reflexive analysis, and denial.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 99-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jbhsi.2017.11.002","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078018300105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The aim of this investigation was to analyze differences between young people who had a positive assessment of breakups and those who had a negative assessment, divided in turn by gender, in relation to the following variables: level of importance, level of commitment, duration of relationship, ways of loving, reasons for breaking up, coping styles, and level of depression resulting from the breakup. To that end, we conducted Student t tests with each of the variables involved. 326 university students age 17–26 (122 men and 204 women) who had recently gone through a breakup in their sentimental relationships participated in the study. Differences were found between women who assessed their breakups positively and those who assessed them negatively in relation to level of importance, level of commitment, duration of relationship, lack of sex drive, lack of commitment, rational incompatibility, in evasive coping styles, cognitive-reflexive analysis, ludic loving style, and total level of depression. In the case of men, differences were also found for level of importance, level of commitment, and coping styles: evasive, cognitive-reflexive analysis, and denial.

大学生情侣分手的特征:对事件认知评估的差异
本调查的目的是分析对分手持积极态度的年轻人和持消极态度的年轻人之间的差异,按性别依次划分,涉及以下变量:重要程度,承诺程度,关系持续时间,爱的方式,分手的原因,应对方式,以及分手导致的抑郁程度。为此,我们对所涉及的每个变量进行了学生t检验。326名年龄在17-26岁之间的大学生(122名男性,204名女性)参与了这项研究,他们最近都经历了感情关系的破裂。在重要性、承诺程度、关系持续时间、缺乏性欲、缺乏承诺、理性不相容、逃避应对方式、认知反射分析、滑稽的爱的方式和总体抑郁程度等方面,积极评价分手的女性和消极评价分手的女性之间存在差异。对于男性来说,在重要性、承诺程度和应对方式(逃避、认知反射分析和否认)上也发现了差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信