Homoeopathic medicine in different scales of potencies in the management of osteoarthritis – a systematic review

S. Stevenson, Vinodini V. Patil
{"title":"Homoeopathic medicine in different scales of potencies in the management of osteoarthritis – a systematic review","authors":"S. Stevenson, Vinodini V. Patil","doi":"10.7770/safer-v13n2-art3001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To assess the evidence for homoeopathic medication taken orally in variouspotencies in the treatment for osteoarthritis. Randomized clinical trials as well as animal experiments comparing homoeopathic medicine to placebo or alternative therapies for osteoarthritis (OA) were considered for inclusion. Systematic database searches and manual backtracking through reference list were used to find them. Information on the result, statistical significance, comparison to the placebo or alternative treatment, and side effects were retrieved. The primary studies methodological caliber was assessed until January 2023. In this review, four trials were chosen, and three of them found evidence that the centesimal scale of potency was successful in treating OA. One study had potency on a decimalscale. The majority of the research design substances investigated lacked significant negative effects. The so-called most recent and fresh form of potencies, 50 millesimal (LM scale) has notyet been researched.As conclusion, we were unable to reach any conclusions regarding the proper scale of potency because the data from the published articles was so limited due to the dearth of randomized controlled trials in the field. It is expected that research would increase and focus in particular on the practical applicability of homoeopathic medicine in various potencies","PeriodicalId":30590,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Agri Food and Environmental Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Agri Food and Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7770/safer-v13n2-art3001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To assess the evidence for homoeopathic medication taken orally in variouspotencies in the treatment for osteoarthritis. Randomized clinical trials as well as animal experiments comparing homoeopathic medicine to placebo or alternative therapies for osteoarthritis (OA) were considered for inclusion. Systematic database searches and manual backtracking through reference list were used to find them. Information on the result, statistical significance, comparison to the placebo or alternative treatment, and side effects were retrieved. The primary studies methodological caliber was assessed until January 2023. In this review, four trials were chosen, and three of them found evidence that the centesimal scale of potency was successful in treating OA. One study had potency on a decimalscale. The majority of the research design substances investigated lacked significant negative effects. The so-called most recent and fresh form of potencies, 50 millesimal (LM scale) has notyet been researched.As conclusion, we were unable to reach any conclusions regarding the proper scale of potency because the data from the published articles was so limited due to the dearth of randomized controlled trials in the field. It is expected that research would increase and focus in particular on the practical applicability of homoeopathic medicine in various potencies
顺势疗法药物在不同效度下治疗骨关节炎的系统综述
评估不同时期口服顺势疗法药物治疗骨关节炎的证据。将顺势疗法药物与安慰剂或骨关节炎(OA)替代疗法进行比较的随机临床试验和动物实验被考虑纳入。使用系统的数据库搜索和通过参考文献列表的手动回溯来找到它们。检索有关结果、统计显著性、与安慰剂或替代治疗的比较以及副作用的信息。在2023年1月之前,对初级研究的方法学口径进行了评估。在这篇综述中,选择了四项试验,其中三项发现了百分制效价在治疗OA方面是成功的证据。一项研究的效力在小数级。调查的大多数研究设计物质缺乏显著的负面影响。所谓的最新和最新形式的潜力,50 millesimal(LM规模)尚未得到研究。作为结论,我们无法就适当的效力范围得出任何结论,因为由于该领域缺乏随机对照试验,发表文章中的数据非常有限。预计研究将增加,并特别关注顺势疗法药物在各种功效中的实际应用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信