Soil health benefits from sequence intensification, fertilization, and no-tillage in annual cropping systems

Valentina Rubio , Jorge Sawchik , Harold van Es
{"title":"Soil health benefits from sequence intensification, fertilization, and no-tillage in annual cropping systems","authors":"Valentina Rubio ,&nbsp;Jorge Sawchik ,&nbsp;Harold van Es","doi":"10.1016/j.soisec.2022.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The expansion of annual cropping systems and associated land cover changes may induce soil degradation, compromising the soil's ability to function and provide ecosystem services, also referred to as soil health (SH). Conservation practices may reduce SH decline, yet their benefits are uncertain. The main objectives of this paper were to apply a comprehensive SH assessment framework to evaluate (i) SH differences in natural grasslands and cropping areas, and (ii) how conservation practices lessen SH deterioration. Soils under natural grasslands were compared to cropped soils from three long-term experiments with treatments evaluating the effects of cover crops and/or pastures incorporation; no-tillage; and crop fertilization for Uruguayan Mollisols. Soil chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity, macro, and micro-nutrients), physical (wet aggregate stability, available water holding capacity, penetration resistance), and biological (organic carbon, active carbon, protein, respiration) indicators were measured. SH was significantly lower across all indicators under cropped areas than under natural grasslands, especially when soil fertility is not adequately maintained in cropping systems. Conservation practices lessened SH degradation, particularly soil biological properties, but had confounding benefits. Overall, gains in SH were linked to adequate soil fertility maintenance and longer active plant growth periods associated with including pastures and cover crops in annual cropping systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74839,"journal":{"name":"Soil security","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006222000405/pdfft?md5=b9550a1a7f9f169e9569d610e13c76ec&pid=1-s2.0-S2667006222000405-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667006222000405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The expansion of annual cropping systems and associated land cover changes may induce soil degradation, compromising the soil's ability to function and provide ecosystem services, also referred to as soil health (SH). Conservation practices may reduce SH decline, yet their benefits are uncertain. The main objectives of this paper were to apply a comprehensive SH assessment framework to evaluate (i) SH differences in natural grasslands and cropping areas, and (ii) how conservation practices lessen SH deterioration. Soils under natural grasslands were compared to cropped soils from three long-term experiments with treatments evaluating the effects of cover crops and/or pastures incorporation; no-tillage; and crop fertilization for Uruguayan Mollisols. Soil chemical (pH, cation exchange capacity, macro, and micro-nutrients), physical (wet aggregate stability, available water holding capacity, penetration resistance), and biological (organic carbon, active carbon, protein, respiration) indicators were measured. SH was significantly lower across all indicators under cropped areas than under natural grasslands, especially when soil fertility is not adequately maintained in cropping systems. Conservation practices lessened SH degradation, particularly soil biological properties, but had confounding benefits. Overall, gains in SH were linked to adequate soil fertility maintenance and longer active plant growth periods associated with including pastures and cover crops in annual cropping systems.

土壤健康受益于一年制作物的序列强化、施肥和免耕
一年生种植制度的扩大和相关的土地覆盖变化可能导致土壤退化,损害土壤的功能和提供生态系统服务的能力,也被称为土壤健康。保护措施可能会减少SH的下降,但其效益是不确定的。本文的主要目标是应用一个综合的SH评估框架来评估(i)天然草地和种植区的SH差异,以及(ii)保护措施如何减轻SH恶化。将天然草地下的土壤与种植过的土壤进行了3个长期试验,评价了覆盖作物和/或牧场合并的效果;免耕;以及乌拉圭Mollisols的作物施肥。测定了土壤化学指标(pH值、阳离子交换容量、宏量和微量养分)、物理指标(湿团聚体稳定性、有效持水量、渗透阻力)和生物指标(有机碳、活性碳、蛋白质、呼吸)。在种植区,特别是在种植系统不能充分保持土壤肥力的情况下,所有指标的SH都明显低于天然草地。保护措施减少了SH的退化,特别是土壤的生物特性,但也有混淆的好处。总的来说,土壤肥力的增加与适当的土壤肥力维持和较长的植物生长期有关,这与在一年生种植系统中包括牧场和覆盖作物有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil security
Soil security Soil Science
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信