Drivers affecting Indonesian pre-service teachers’ intention to use m-learning: Structural equation modeling at three universities

Q1 Social Sciences
Akhmad Habibi, Yasir Riady, Turki Mesfer Alqahtani, M. Muhaimin, Nour Awni Albelbisi, A. Jaya, Lalu Nurul Yaqin
{"title":"Drivers affecting Indonesian pre-service teachers’ intention to use m-learning: Structural equation modeling at three universities","authors":"Akhmad Habibi, Yasir Riady, Turki Mesfer Alqahtani, M. Muhaimin, Nour Awni Albelbisi, A. Jaya, Lalu Nurul Yaqin","doi":"10.1177/20427530221118775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study uses the technology acceptance model to understand the drivers affecting Indonesian pre-service teachers’ intention to use m-learning. Eleven hypotheses were proposed within seven variables; self-efficacy, subjective norms, facilitating conditions, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes, and intention to use m-learning. Content validity index and pilot study were conducted before the data collection. The survey instrument was distributed to more than 1000 Indonesian pre-service teachers; however, 772 responses were measurable. The analysis was achieved through the partial least square structural equation modeling and t-test. Findings revealed that 10 out of 11 relationships were significant. Intention to use m-learning was significantly predicted by perceived usefulness and attitude. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use were the significant predictors of attitude. Self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and subjective norms were reported to predict perceived usefulness, while an insignificant correlation emerged between facilitating conditions and perceived usefulness. Perceived ease of use was significantly affected by facilitating conditions, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Additionally, the difference test reported that the mean scores between participants’ gender were different regarding intention to use m-learning; female teachers’ intention to use m-learning was lower than their male teacher counterparts. An insignificant difference was confirmed based on age. Suggestions are proposed to improve technology integration in education, especially m-learning integration in Indonesia.","PeriodicalId":39456,"journal":{"name":"E-Learning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530221118775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The current study uses the technology acceptance model to understand the drivers affecting Indonesian pre-service teachers’ intention to use m-learning. Eleven hypotheses were proposed within seven variables; self-efficacy, subjective norms, facilitating conditions, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitudes, and intention to use m-learning. Content validity index and pilot study were conducted before the data collection. The survey instrument was distributed to more than 1000 Indonesian pre-service teachers; however, 772 responses were measurable. The analysis was achieved through the partial least square structural equation modeling and t-test. Findings revealed that 10 out of 11 relationships were significant. Intention to use m-learning was significantly predicted by perceived usefulness and attitude. Perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use were the significant predictors of attitude. Self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and subjective norms were reported to predict perceived usefulness, while an insignificant correlation emerged between facilitating conditions and perceived usefulness. Perceived ease of use was significantly affected by facilitating conditions, subjective norms, and self-efficacy. Additionally, the difference test reported that the mean scores between participants’ gender were different regarding intention to use m-learning; female teachers’ intention to use m-learning was lower than their male teacher counterparts. An insignificant difference was confirmed based on age. Suggestions are proposed to improve technology integration in education, especially m-learning integration in Indonesia.
影响印尼职前教师使用移动学习意向的驱动因素:三所大学的结构方程模型
本研究使用技术接受模型来了解影响印尼职前教师使用移动学习意愿的驱动因素。在7个变量中提出了11个假设;自我效能、主观规范、促进条件、感知有用性、感知易用性、态度和使用移动学习的意图。数据收集前进行内容效度指标和先导研究。向1000多名印尼职前教师发放了调查问卷;然而,有772个反应是可测量的。通过偏最小二乘结构方程建模和t检验进行分析。研究结果显示,11种关系中有10种是显著的。感知有用性和态度显著预测使用移动学习的意向。感知有用性和感知易用性是态度的显著预测因子。自我效能、感知易用性和主观规范可以预测感知有用性,而便利条件与感知有用性之间的相关性不显著。感知易用性受便利条件、主观规范和自我效能感的显著影响。此外,差异检验报告了参与者在使用移动学习意愿方面的平均得分在性别之间存在差异;女教师使用移动学习的意愿低于男教师。基于年龄的差异不显著。提出了改进教育技术整合的建议,特别是印度尼西亚的移动学习整合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
E-Learning
E-Learning Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: E-Learning and Digital Media is a peer-reviewed international journal directed towards the study and research of e-learning in its diverse aspects: pedagogical, curricular, sociological, economic, philosophical and political. This journal explores the ways that different disciplines and alternative approaches can shed light on the study of technically mediated education. Working at the intersection of theoretical psychology, sociology, history, politics and philosophy it poses new questions and offers new answers for research and practice related to digital technologies in education. The change of the title of the journal in 2010 from E-Learning to E-Learning and Digital Media is expressive of this new and emphatically interdisciplinary orientation, and also reflects the fact that technologically-mediated education needs to be located within the political economy and informational ecology of changing mediatic forms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信