Effect of Goal Directed Physiotherapy vs a Goal Directed Home Program in AtRisk Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

{"title":"Effect of Goal Directed Physiotherapy vs a Goal Directed Home Program in AtRisk Infants: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/an.04.03.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Goal directed physiotherapy is a task oriented therapy based on neurodevelopmental principles used in rehabilitation process. The aim of this study is to compare the neurodevelopmental effects of early goal directed physiotherapy with a detailed goal directed home program in infants with risk. Methods: Forty at-risk infants (18 male, 22 female, median age 5.69 mo) were assigned to early goal directed physiotherapy and detailed goal directed home program group randomely. Both early goal directed physiotherapy and detailed goal directed home program continued for 12 weeks. The outcome measures were Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination, Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Goal Attainment Scale. Results: Significant difference was found in Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in early goal directed physiotherapy group (p<0.05) whereas no difference was found in Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Goal Attainment Scale between the groups (p>0.05). In all test results the effect size of early goal directed physiotherapy was more than detailed goal directed home program. Conclusions: According to our results, though Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination results are better in the early goal directed physiotherapy group, it can be concluded that if parents had good, attainable and eligible guidelines received from the physiotherapist, detailed goal directed home program is also a useful approach in rehabilitation programs of infants with risk.","PeriodicalId":93246,"journal":{"name":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/an.04.03.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Goal directed physiotherapy is a task oriented therapy based on neurodevelopmental principles used in rehabilitation process. The aim of this study is to compare the neurodevelopmental effects of early goal directed physiotherapy with a detailed goal directed home program in infants with risk. Methods: Forty at-risk infants (18 male, 22 female, median age 5.69 mo) were assigned to early goal directed physiotherapy and detailed goal directed home program group randomely. Both early goal directed physiotherapy and detailed goal directed home program continued for 12 weeks. The outcome measures were Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination, Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Goal Attainment Scale. Results: Significant difference was found in Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination in early goal directed physiotherapy group (p<0.05) whereas no difference was found in Alberta Infant Motor Scale and Goal Attainment Scale between the groups (p>0.05). In all test results the effect size of early goal directed physiotherapy was more than detailed goal directed home program. Conclusions: According to our results, though Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination results are better in the early goal directed physiotherapy group, it can be concluded that if parents had good, attainable and eligible guidelines received from the physiotherapist, detailed goal directed home program is also a useful approach in rehabilitation programs of infants with risk.
目标导向物理治疗与目标导向家庭计划在高危婴儿中的效果:一项随机临床试验
背景:目标导向物理治疗是一种基于神经发育原理的任务导向治疗,应用于康复过程。本研究的目的是比较早期目标导向物理治疗与详细目标导向家庭计划对有风险婴儿的神经发育影响。方法:40例高危婴儿(男18例,女22例,中位年龄5.69月龄)随机分为早期目标定向物理治疗组和详细目标定向家庭方案组。早期目标定向物理治疗和详细目标定向家庭治疗均持续12周。结果测量采用Hammersmith婴儿神经系统检查、Alberta婴儿运动量表和目标实现量表。结果:早期目标定向物理治疗组汉默史密斯婴儿神经系统检查结果差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。在所有测试结果中,早期目标导向物理治疗的效应量大于详细目标导向家庭计划的效应量。结论:根据我们的研究结果,尽管Hammersmith婴儿神经系统检查结果在早期目标定向物理治疗组中更好,但可以得出结论,如果父母从物理治疗师那里获得了良好的,可实现的和合格的指导方针,那么详细的目标定向家庭计划也是有风险婴儿康复计划的有用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信