Possible XOR fallacy – Case report of combined foramen sternale with an osseous sternal knife stab injury

Wolf Schweitzer, Garyfalia Ampanozi, Lars Ebert, Michael Thali, Damaris Fröhlich Knaute
{"title":"Possible XOR fallacy – Case report of combined foramen sternale with an osseous sternal knife stab injury","authors":"Wolf Schweitzer,&nbsp;Garyfalia Ampanozi,&nbsp;Lars Ebert,&nbsp;Michael Thali,&nbsp;Damaris Fröhlich Knaute","doi":"10.1016/j.jofri.2018.02.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This case report details a sternal finding that first was reported as penetrating knife stab wound. It was one in a series of 24 otherwise relatively superficial skin stab wounds allegedly performed by a single assailant within the scope of a single attack. The effort required to penetrate the </span>sternum with a knife appears to be considerably higher than to inflict relatively superficial skin and soft tissue penetration. This initially raised suspicion of another person contributing to the attack, or, a different weapon being used. After reviewing the clinical CT scans, we identified the combination of a preexisting sternal foramen with a marginal fracture and concluded that the sternal “penetration” was in keeping with the depth of the other 23 stab wounds. None of the injuries were lethal, the victim survived the attack. Assuming that a knife penetration fracture of a sternum and a foramen sternale are mutually exclusive constitutes an exclusive-OR fallacy (XOR fallacy).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45371,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jofri.2018.02.009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212478017300539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This case report details a sternal finding that first was reported as penetrating knife stab wound. It was one in a series of 24 otherwise relatively superficial skin stab wounds allegedly performed by a single assailant within the scope of a single attack. The effort required to penetrate the sternum with a knife appears to be considerably higher than to inflict relatively superficial skin and soft tissue penetration. This initially raised suspicion of another person contributing to the attack, or, a different weapon being used. After reviewing the clinical CT scans, we identified the combination of a preexisting sternal foramen with a marginal fracture and concluded that the sternal “penetration” was in keeping with the depth of the other 23 stab wounds. None of the injuries were lethal, the victim survived the attack. Assuming that a knife penetration fracture of a sternum and a foramen sternale are mutually exclusive constitutes an exclusive-OR fallacy (XOR fallacy).

可能的XOR谬误——胸骨孔合并胸骨骨刀刺伤的病例报告
本病例报告详细介绍了胸骨发现,首先报告为穿透性刀刺伤。这是一系列24处相对浅表的皮肤刺伤中的一处,据称是由同一名袭击者在一次袭击范围内造成的。用刀刺穿胸骨所需要的努力似乎比刺穿相对浅层的皮肤和软组织要大得多。这最初引起了另一个人参与袭击的怀疑,或者是使用了不同的武器。在检查了临床CT扫描后,我们确定了先前存在的胸骨孔和边缘骨折的组合,并得出结论,胸骨“穿透”与其他23个刺伤的深度保持一致。没有致命伤,受害者在袭击中幸免于难。假设刀子穿透性胸骨骨折和胸骨孔骨折是相互排斥的,这构成了异或谬误(XOR谬误)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging
Journal of Forensic Radiology and Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信