Customary and Legal Principles of Communication in Relation to Unethical Speech Acts

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Joanna Kowalczyk
{"title":"Customary and Legal Principles of Communication in Relation to Unethical Speech Acts","authors":"Joanna Kowalczyk","doi":"10.15388/respectus.2023.43.48.110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper discusses the problem of unethical speech acts, verbal aggression and valuing of texts in the context of legal regulations concerning the axiology of communication in a democratic state. The aim of the study was to describe the relationship between linguistic activity and the rules of ethics of expression in the context of Polish cultural-civilisational conditions and legal directives on ethics of expression and to relate forms of linguistic aggression to how they are qualified as prohibited acts that violate the norms of acceptable patterns of communication. The research corpus comes from legal acts and public statements. The legislative corpus was based on two normative texts fundamental for regulating the ethics of social life, i.e. the Constitution of the Republic of Poland (K97) and the Polish Penal Code(KK97). Discursive analysis and legal functional-systemic interpretation constituted the methodological foundation of the study. The analysis showed the expected functionality of a word in the context of a community organised within state structures. On the one hand, a word can be a way of describing reality or emotions, and on the other, an object of legal protection or an instrument of crime.","PeriodicalId":36933,"journal":{"name":"Respectus Philologicus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respectus Philologicus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/respectus.2023.43.48.110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present paper discusses the problem of unethical speech acts, verbal aggression and valuing of texts in the context of legal regulations concerning the axiology of communication in a democratic state. The aim of the study was to describe the relationship between linguistic activity and the rules of ethics of expression in the context of Polish cultural-civilisational conditions and legal directives on ethics of expression and to relate forms of linguistic aggression to how they are qualified as prohibited acts that violate the norms of acceptable patterns of communication. The research corpus comes from legal acts and public statements. The legislative corpus was based on two normative texts fundamental for regulating the ethics of social life, i.e. the Constitution of the Republic of Poland (K97) and the Polish Penal Code(KK97). Discursive analysis and legal functional-systemic interpretation constituted the methodological foundation of the study. The analysis showed the expected functionality of a word in the context of a community organised within state structures. On the one hand, a word can be a way of describing reality or emotions, and on the other, an object of legal protection or an instrument of crime.
与不道德言论行为有关的交际习惯和法律原则
本文在有关民主国家传播价值论的法律规定的背景下,讨论了不道德的言论行为、言语攻击和文本价值问题。这项研究的目的是在波兰文化文明条件和言论道德法律指令的背景下,描述语言活动与言论道德规则之间的关系,并将语言攻击形式与如何将其定性为违反可接受的交流模式规范的违禁行为联系起来。研究语料库来源于法律行为和公开声明。立法主体以规范社会生活伦理的两个基本规范性文本为基础,即《波兰共和国宪法》(K97)和《波兰刑法》(KK97)。话语分析和法律功能系统解释构成了本研究的方法论基础。该分析显示了一个词在国家结构内组织的社区背景下的预期功能。一方面,一个词可以是描述现实或情感的一种方式,另一方面,它可以是法律保护的对象或犯罪工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respectus Philologicus
Respectus Philologicus Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信