CiviAct: Negotiating ‘fields of paradox’ in anti-racist university community partnerships

Q1 Social Sciences
W. Mason, Patrick G. Williams
{"title":"CiviAct: Negotiating ‘fields of paradox’ in anti-racist university community partnerships","authors":"W. Mason, Patrick G. Williams","doi":"10.1177/20597991221129780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces and critically reflects upon the development of CiviAct – a multi-agency project that partners six anti-racist activist organisations and two universities in the North of England. CiviAct seeks to support and realise the benefits of youth and community-led civic action. It does this by: (i) financially resourcing the work of six anti-racist activist organisations; (ii) connecting those organisations with each other to create new opportunities for co-learning; and (iii) exploring new models of community-led university partnership. Based on insights derived from a 12-month development period (conducted throughout the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic) we examine points of tension, manifested at the intersections between community partners, universities and project funders. Extending Strier’s discussion of university-community partnerships (UCP) as ‘fields of paradox’, we outline the complexities of collaborative working within a UCP that seeks to adhere to the priorities of anti-racism and an ethic of love. In doing so this article surfaces the burden of boundary work undertaken by both academic partners seeking to prioritise knowledge and anti-racist practices beyond the academy, and community activists, who are expected to conform with institutional standards that may have little relevance to their practice. The article contributes a series of reflections that may be of use to other activist researchers engaged in UCP.","PeriodicalId":32579,"journal":{"name":"Methodological Innovations","volume":"15 1","pages":"363 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methodological Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221129780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article introduces and critically reflects upon the development of CiviAct – a multi-agency project that partners six anti-racist activist organisations and two universities in the North of England. CiviAct seeks to support and realise the benefits of youth and community-led civic action. It does this by: (i) financially resourcing the work of six anti-racist activist organisations; (ii) connecting those organisations with each other to create new opportunities for co-learning; and (iii) exploring new models of community-led university partnership. Based on insights derived from a 12-month development period (conducted throughout the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic) we examine points of tension, manifested at the intersections between community partners, universities and project funders. Extending Strier’s discussion of university-community partnerships (UCP) as ‘fields of paradox’, we outline the complexities of collaborative working within a UCP that seeks to adhere to the priorities of anti-racism and an ethic of love. In doing so this article surfaces the burden of boundary work undertaken by both academic partners seeking to prioritise knowledge and anti-racist practices beyond the academy, and community activists, who are expected to conform with institutional standards that may have little relevance to their practice. The article contributes a series of reflections that may be of use to other activist researchers engaged in UCP.
公民法案:在反种族主义的大学-社区伙伴关系中谈判“悖论领域”
本文介绍并批判性地反思了“公民法案”的发展,这是一个多机构项目,与英格兰北部的六个反种族主义活动组织和两所大学合作。“公民行动”旨在支持和实现青年和社区主导的公民行动的好处。为此,它:(i)为六个反种族主义活动组织的工作提供财政资源;(ii)将这些机构连结起来,创造共同学习的新机会;(三)探索社区主导的大学合作新模式。根据为期12个月的开发期(在Covid-19大流行的第一波期间进行)得出的见解,我们研究了社区合作伙伴、大学和项目资助者之间的紧张点。将Strier关于大学-社区伙伴关系(UCP)的讨论扩展为“悖论领域”,我们概述了在UCP中合作工作的复杂性,该UCP寻求坚持反种族主义和爱的伦理的优先事项。在这样做的过程中,本文揭示了学术合作伙伴和社区活动家所承担的边界工作的负担,这些合作伙伴寻求在学术界之外优先考虑知识和反种族主义实践,而社区活动家则被期望遵守可能与他们的实践无关的制度标准。这篇文章提供了一系列的思考,可能对其他从事UCP的激进研究人员有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Methodological Innovations
Methodological Innovations Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书