{"title":"South African consumers’ interpretation of nutritional labelling systems of food products","authors":"Fanny Sekitla Mabotja, D. Metcalfe, O. Adebo","doi":"10.1080/0035919X.2020.1834466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nutritional labelling systems are used for effectively communicating food’s nutritional value to consumers. This study investigated the effectiveness of three existing and two proposed nutritional labelling systems in communicating the nutritional value of foods. The extent to which South African consumers make use of nutritional labelling systems to influence their food choices was also interrogated. Findings indicate that nutritional labelling systems are considered important by most participants and are used when making food choices. Nonetheless, some participants confirmed challenges with interpreting nutritional labelling systems. The observed preference for the Nestlé Know Your Serving (NKYS), Teaspoon Nutritional Illustration (TNI), Nutritional Information Table (NIT) and Guideline Daily Allowance (GDA) systems was 76%, 69%, 68%, and 67%, respectively. The lowest preference was for the Traffic Light Labelling (TLL) system (52%). Based on the percentage preference for these nutritional labelling systems, it was found that participants fall into two groups. The first group is participants with preferences for numerical data as presented by the NIT and GDA, while the second group prefers graphical data as presented by the NKYS, TNI and TLL systems. Findings from this study suggest that the use of nutritional labelling systems representing both numerical and graphical data could improve South African consumers’ understanding of the nutritional information found on food labels.","PeriodicalId":23255,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","volume":"76 1","pages":"41 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/0035919X.2020.1834466","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2020.1834466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Nutritional labelling systems are used for effectively communicating food’s nutritional value to consumers. This study investigated the effectiveness of three existing and two proposed nutritional labelling systems in communicating the nutritional value of foods. The extent to which South African consumers make use of nutritional labelling systems to influence their food choices was also interrogated. Findings indicate that nutritional labelling systems are considered important by most participants and are used when making food choices. Nonetheless, some participants confirmed challenges with interpreting nutritional labelling systems. The observed preference for the Nestlé Know Your Serving (NKYS), Teaspoon Nutritional Illustration (TNI), Nutritional Information Table (NIT) and Guideline Daily Allowance (GDA) systems was 76%, 69%, 68%, and 67%, respectively. The lowest preference was for the Traffic Light Labelling (TLL) system (52%). Based on the percentage preference for these nutritional labelling systems, it was found that participants fall into two groups. The first group is participants with preferences for numerical data as presented by the NIT and GDA, while the second group prefers graphical data as presented by the NKYS, TNI and TLL systems. Findings from this study suggest that the use of nutritional labelling systems representing both numerical and graphical data could improve South African consumers’ understanding of the nutritional information found on food labels.
期刊介绍:
Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa , published on behalf of the Royal Society of South Africa since 1908, comprises a rich archive of original scientific research in and beyond South Africa. Since 1878, when it was founded as Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, the Journal’s strength has lain in its multi- and inter-disciplinary orientation, which is aimed at ‘promoting the improvement and diffusion of science in all its branches’ (original Charter). Today this includes natural, physical, medical, environmental and earth sciences as well as any other topic that may be of interest or importance to the people of Africa. Transactions publishes original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, festschriften and book reviews. While coverage emphasizes southern Africa, submissions concerning the rest of the continent are encouraged.