The Impact of Physiological Interpretation of Cardiotocogram (CTG) in Conjunction with Fetal ECG (STAN) on Intrapartum Emergency Caesarean Sections

E. Chandraharan
{"title":"The Impact of Physiological Interpretation of Cardiotocogram (CTG) in Conjunction with Fetal ECG (STAN) on Intrapartum Emergency Caesarean Sections","authors":"E. Chandraharan","doi":"10.19080/gjorm.2021.08.555738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The false-positive rate of the “pathological” CTG has been reported as >60%, which resulted in an exponential increase in emergency intrapartum caesarean sections for “fetal distress”. Fetal ECG (ST-Analyser or STAN) was introduced into clinical practice to reduce the false positive rate of the CTG. Objective: To determine the impact of Physiological interpretation of Cardiotocogram (CTG) in Conjunction with Fetal ECG (STAN) on intrapartum emergency caesarean sections. Methods: A retrospective study at the Royal Gwent Hospital in South Wales following the introduction of STAN monitoring after training in Physiological Interpretation of CTG in 2014. Total Caesarean section rate, emergency caesarean section rate for fetal compromise (i.e., “fetal distress”), operative vaginal delivery rate and spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) rate were analyzed for the first 19 months after the intervention (October 2014- 2016) and were compared with 2012 -September 2014). Result: There were 7977 deliveries during the 19-month period from 01 October 2014 to 30 April 2016. The average total Caesarean section rate was 23.5% and the emergency Caesarean section rate for suspected fetal compromise (“fetal distress”) was 13.6%, an observed increase in the rate of spontaneous vaginal births from 63% to 71%. There was a statistically significant reduction in the intrapartum emergency caesarean sections performed for “fetal distress” immediately after the introduction of STAN following training on Physiological Interpretation of CTG from 5.57% to 2.1%. The rate of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) due to CTG misinterpretation was reduced by 50% following the training on Physiological Interpretation of CTG. Conclusion: Training on physiological interpretation of the CTG before the introduction of STAN, and its use in conjunction with STAN resulted in a statistically significant reduction of intrapartum emergency caesarean section for “fetal distress”, and a 50%reduction in the HIE rate due to CTG misinterpretation.","PeriodicalId":92369,"journal":{"name":"Global journal of reproductive medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/gjorm.2021.08.555738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The false-positive rate of the “pathological” CTG has been reported as >60%, which resulted in an exponential increase in emergency intrapartum caesarean sections for “fetal distress”. Fetal ECG (ST-Analyser or STAN) was introduced into clinical practice to reduce the false positive rate of the CTG. Objective: To determine the impact of Physiological interpretation of Cardiotocogram (CTG) in Conjunction with Fetal ECG (STAN) on intrapartum emergency caesarean sections. Methods: A retrospective study at the Royal Gwent Hospital in South Wales following the introduction of STAN monitoring after training in Physiological Interpretation of CTG in 2014. Total Caesarean section rate, emergency caesarean section rate for fetal compromise (i.e., “fetal distress”), operative vaginal delivery rate and spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) rate were analyzed for the first 19 months after the intervention (October 2014- 2016) and were compared with 2012 -September 2014). Result: There were 7977 deliveries during the 19-month period from 01 October 2014 to 30 April 2016. The average total Caesarean section rate was 23.5% and the emergency Caesarean section rate for suspected fetal compromise (“fetal distress”) was 13.6%, an observed increase in the rate of spontaneous vaginal births from 63% to 71%. There was a statistically significant reduction in the intrapartum emergency caesarean sections performed for “fetal distress” immediately after the introduction of STAN following training on Physiological Interpretation of CTG from 5.57% to 2.1%. The rate of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) due to CTG misinterpretation was reduced by 50% following the training on Physiological Interpretation of CTG. Conclusion: Training on physiological interpretation of the CTG before the introduction of STAN, and its use in conjunction with STAN resulted in a statistically significant reduction of intrapartum emergency caesarean section for “fetal distress”, and a 50%reduction in the HIE rate due to CTG misinterpretation.
心电图(CTG)与胎儿心电图(STAN)的生理解释对产时紧急剖腹产的影响
背景:据报道,“病理性”CTG的假阳性率高达60%,这导致因“胎儿窘迫”而进行的紧急产时剖腹产呈指数级增长。胎儿心电图(st - analyzer或STAN)被引入临床,以减少CTG的假阳性率。目的:探讨心电图(CTG)生理解释与胎儿心电图(STAN)对产时急诊剖宫产的影响。方法:在2014年接受CTG生理解释培训后引入STAN监测后,在南威尔士皇家格温特医院进行回顾性研究。分析干预后前19个月(2014年10月- 2016年)的总剖宫产率、胎儿妥协(即“胎儿窘迫”)急诊剖宫产率、手术阴道分娩率和自然阴道分娩率(SVD),并与2012年- 2014年9月进行比较。结果:2014年10月1日至2016年4月30日共19个月,分娩7977例。平均总剖宫产率为23.5%,疑似胎儿受损("胎儿窘迫")的紧急剖宫产率为13.6%,观察到阴道自然分娩率从63%增加到71%。经CTG生理解释培训后,引入STAN后立即因“胎儿窘迫”进行的产时紧急剖宫产从5.57%降至2.1%,具有统计学意义。接受CTG生理解释训练后,由于CTG误读导致的缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)发生率降低了50%。结论:在引入STAN之前对CTG进行生理解释培训,并将其与STAN结合使用,可显著减少因“胎儿窘迫”而进行的产时紧急剖腹产,并使CTG误读导致的HIE发生率降低50%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信