The role of cultural psychological orientations for flexibility in coping with stress in Polish adolescents

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Agnieszka Kruczek, Izabela Grzankowska, M. Basińska
{"title":"The role of cultural psychological orientations for flexibility in coping with stress in Polish adolescents","authors":"Agnieszka Kruczek, Izabela Grzankowska, M. Basińska","doi":"10.15557/pipk.2021.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the dominant cultural psychological orientation among Polish youth, the role of individualism and collectivism for flexibility in coping, and the assessment of the modifying role of gender and age of the studied youth for the relationship between the included cultural psychological orientations and the flexibility in coping with stress. Materials and methods: A total of 367 adolescents (131 boys and 236 girls) aged between 13 and 20 participated in the study. The following methods were used: the Individualism–Collectivist Questionnaire by Harry Triandis and Michele Gelfand, Flexibility in Coping with Stress Questionnaire by Basińska et al., and a personal survey. Results: Polish adolescents obtained the highest average score in the psychological orientation of vertical collectivism. There were statistically significant positive correlations between horizontal individualism, horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivism and flexibility in coping and its dimensions. Moreover, Polish adolescents’ psychological orientation – horizontal individualism – was a predictor of flexibility in coping with stress and its dimensions. The analysis revealed that the model for the relationship between horizontal individualism and coping competences with the modifying role of age was statistically significant. Younger adolescents (from 13 to 17 years of age) were more individually oriented horizontally, and had higher coping competences, whereas in the group of older adolescents (>17.4) this effect was not observed. Conclusions: The results of the study are an important contribution to the recognition of flexibility in coping, but also answer numerous questions about its relationships with cultural psychological orientation.","PeriodicalId":42849,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria i Psychologia Kliniczna-JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/pipk.2021.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess the dominant cultural psychological orientation among Polish youth, the role of individualism and collectivism for flexibility in coping, and the assessment of the modifying role of gender and age of the studied youth for the relationship between the included cultural psychological orientations and the flexibility in coping with stress. Materials and methods: A total of 367 adolescents (131 boys and 236 girls) aged between 13 and 20 participated in the study. The following methods were used: the Individualism–Collectivist Questionnaire by Harry Triandis and Michele Gelfand, Flexibility in Coping with Stress Questionnaire by Basińska et al., and a personal survey. Results: Polish adolescents obtained the highest average score in the psychological orientation of vertical collectivism. There were statistically significant positive correlations between horizontal individualism, horizontal collectivism, vertical collectivism and flexibility in coping and its dimensions. Moreover, Polish adolescents’ psychological orientation – horizontal individualism – was a predictor of flexibility in coping with stress and its dimensions. The analysis revealed that the model for the relationship between horizontal individualism and coping competences with the modifying role of age was statistically significant. Younger adolescents (from 13 to 17 years of age) were more individually oriented horizontally, and had higher coping competences, whereas in the group of older adolescents (>17.4) this effect was not observed. Conclusions: The results of the study are an important contribution to the recognition of flexibility in coping, but also answer numerous questions about its relationships with cultural psychological orientation.
文化心理取向对波兰青少年应对压力灵活性的作用
目的:评估波兰青年的主流文化心理取向、个人主义和集体主义对应对灵活性的作用,以及性别和年龄对所包含的文化心理取向与应对压力灵活性关系的调节作用。材料与方法:共有367名13 - 20岁的青少年(男孩131名,女孩236名)参与了本研究。采用的方法有:Harry Triandis和Michele Gelfand的《个人主义-集体主义问卷》,Basińska等人的《应对压力的灵活性问卷》和个人调查。结果:波兰青少年纵向集体主义心理取向平均得分最高。横向个人主义、横向集体主义、纵向集体主义与应对灵活性及其维度存在显著正相关。此外,波兰青少年的心理取向-横向个人主义-是应对压力及其维度的灵活性的预测因子。分析发现,水平个人主义与应对能力的关系模型在年龄的修正作用下具有统计学意义。年龄较小的青少年(13 ~ 17岁)具有更强的水平个人取向,具有更高的应对能力,而年龄较大的青少年(bb0 17.4)则没有这种影响。结论:本研究的结果对应对灵活性的认识做出了重要贡献,同时也回答了其与文化心理取向之间关系的许多问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA is an international peer-reviewed scientific journal publishing original articles that constitute significant contributions to the advancements of psychiatry and psychology. In addition, PSYCHIATRIA I PSYCHOLOGIA KLINICZNA publishes information from the medical associations, reports and materials from international congresses, letters to the Editor, information on new medical products as well as abstracts and discussions on papers published in other scientific journals, reviews of books and other publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信