Combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) approach of multi-criteria decision-making for grading of Tossa jute fibres

IF 1.5 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES
Ashis K. Mitra
{"title":"Combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) approach of multi-criteria decision-making for grading of Tossa jute fibres","authors":"Ashis K. Mitra","doi":"10.1108/rjta-05-2022-0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe present study aims to demonstrate the application of newly developed combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) approach for grading and selection of Tossa jute fibres, which possesses some unique features uncommon to other variants of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe CODAS method was used in this study to rank/grade ten candidate lots of Tossa fibres on the basis of six apposite jute fibre properties, namely, fibre defect, root content, fineness, strength, colour and density. These six fibre properties were considered as the six decision criteria, here, and they were assigned weights as determined previously by an earlier researcher using analytic hierarchy process. The grading of jute fibres was done based on a comprehensive single index known as the assessment scores (Hi), in descending order of magnitude.\n\n\nFindings\nAmong the 10 Tossa jute lots, T2 was ranked 1 (top grade) because of the highest assessment score of 6.887, followed by T1 with Rank 2 (assessment score 1.830). Because of the least assessment score of −2.795, the candidate lot T4 was considered as the worst, and hence ranked 10. The overall ranking pattern given by the CODAS method was similar to the TOPSIS approach done by Ghosh and Das (2013). This study was supported by various sensitivity analyses to judge the efficacy of the present approach. No occurrence of rank reversal during the sensitivity analyses obviously corroborates the robustness and stability of the CODAS method.\n\n\nPractical implications\nJute pricing is fixed solely by the quality for which grading of fibre is prerequisite. The traditional “Hand and Eye” method or Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) system for jute grading is basically subjective assessment and need domain expertise. MCDM is reported as the most viable solution which gives due importance to the fibre parameters while grading the fibres based on a single index. The present study demonstrates the maiden application of CODAS to address the fibre grading problems for jute industries. This approach can also be extended to solve other decision problems of textile industry, in general.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nCODAS is a recently developed exponent of MCDM. Uniqueness of the present study lies in the fact that this is the first ever application of CODAS in the domain of textile industry, in general, and jute industry, in particular. CODAS approach is very simple involving a few simple mathematical equations yet a potent tool of decision-making. This method possesses some features uncommon in other variants of MCDM. Moreover, the efficacy of CODAS method is investigated through various sensitivity analyses, which has been ignored in the earlier approaches.\n","PeriodicalId":21107,"journal":{"name":"Research journal of textile and apparel","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research journal of textile and apparel","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/rjta-05-2022-0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The present study aims to demonstrate the application of newly developed combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) approach for grading and selection of Tossa jute fibres, which possesses some unique features uncommon to other variants of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method. Design/methodology/approach The CODAS method was used in this study to rank/grade ten candidate lots of Tossa fibres on the basis of six apposite jute fibre properties, namely, fibre defect, root content, fineness, strength, colour and density. These six fibre properties were considered as the six decision criteria, here, and they were assigned weights as determined previously by an earlier researcher using analytic hierarchy process. The grading of jute fibres was done based on a comprehensive single index known as the assessment scores (Hi), in descending order of magnitude. Findings Among the 10 Tossa jute lots, T2 was ranked 1 (top grade) because of the highest assessment score of 6.887, followed by T1 with Rank 2 (assessment score 1.830). Because of the least assessment score of −2.795, the candidate lot T4 was considered as the worst, and hence ranked 10. The overall ranking pattern given by the CODAS method was similar to the TOPSIS approach done by Ghosh and Das (2013). This study was supported by various sensitivity analyses to judge the efficacy of the present approach. No occurrence of rank reversal during the sensitivity analyses obviously corroborates the robustness and stability of the CODAS method. Practical implications Jute pricing is fixed solely by the quality for which grading of fibre is prerequisite. The traditional “Hand and Eye” method or Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) system for jute grading is basically subjective assessment and need domain expertise. MCDM is reported as the most viable solution which gives due importance to the fibre parameters while grading the fibres based on a single index. The present study demonstrates the maiden application of CODAS to address the fibre grading problems for jute industries. This approach can also be extended to solve other decision problems of textile industry, in general. Originality/value CODAS is a recently developed exponent of MCDM. Uniqueness of the present study lies in the fact that this is the first ever application of CODAS in the domain of textile industry, in general, and jute industry, in particular. CODAS approach is very simple involving a few simple mathematical equations yet a potent tool of decision-making. This method possesses some features uncommon in other variants of MCDM. Moreover, the efficacy of CODAS method is investigated through various sensitivity analyses, which has been ignored in the earlier approaches.
Tossa黄麻纤维分级多准则决策的组合距离评估方法
本研究旨在展示新开发的基于距离的组合评估(CODAS)方法在土麻纤维分级和选择中的应用,该方法具有其他多标准决策(MCDM)方法所不具备的一些独特特征。设计/方法/方法本研究采用CODAS方法,根据6个相关的黄麻纤维特性,即纤维缺陷、根含量、细度、强度、颜色和密度,对10个候选批的tosa纤维进行排名/分级。这六种纤维特性被认为是六个决策标准,在这里,它们被分配的权重是由先前的一位研究人员使用层次分析法确定的。黄麻纤维的分级是根据一个综合的单一指数,即评估分数(Hi),按数量级递减进行的。结果10批土沙黄麻中,T2以最高评价分数6.887排名1(最高等级),T1以评价分数1.830排名2(最高等级)。由于评价分数最低,为- 2.795分,因此被认为是最差的T4候选批次,因此排名第10位。CODAS方法给出的总体排名模式与Ghosh和Das(2013)所做的TOPSIS方法相似。本研究得到了各种敏感性分析的支持,以判断本方法的有效性。灵敏度分析中未出现秩反转现象,验证了CODAS方法的稳健性和稳定性。实际意义黄麻的价格完全取决于纤维分级的质量。传统的“手眼法”或印度标准局(BIS)系统对黄麻分级基本上是主观评估,需要领域的专业知识。据报道,MCDM是最可行的解决方案,它在基于单一指标对纤维进行分级时,给予了纤维参数应有的重视。本研究展示了CODAS在解决黄麻工业纤维分级问题上的首次应用。该方法也可推广到一般纺织行业的其他决策问题。原创性/价值ecodas是最近发展起来的MCDM指数。本研究的独特之处在于,这是CODAS在纺织工业领域的第一次应用,一般来说,特别是黄麻工业。CODAS方法非常简单,只涉及几个简单的数学方程,但却是一个强有力的决策工具。该方法具有其他MCDM变体中不常见的一些特征。此外,通过各种敏感性分析来研究CODAS方法的有效性,这在早期的方法中被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research journal of textile and apparel
Research journal of textile and apparel MATERIALS SCIENCE, TEXTILES-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
13.30%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信