{"title":"Responsibility for Future Climate Justice: The Direct Responsibility to Mitigate Structural Injustice for Future Generations","authors":"Daan Keij, Boris Robert van Meurs","doi":"10.1111/japp.12674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this article we argue that duties towards future generations are situated on the collective level and that they should be understood in terms of collective responsibility for structural injustice. In the context of climate change, it seems self-evident that our moral duties pertain not only to the current generation but to future generations as well. However, conceptualizing this leads to the non-identity problem: future persons cannot be harmed by present-day choices because they would not have existed if other choices had been made. Recently, Charlotte Franziska Unruh has proposed a solution that places the duties not on the individual level but on the collective level. The current generation has a responsibility for future generations as a whole. This solution is promising, but we argue that it problematically overlooks the existence of unjust relations within the contemporary collective, as we all contribute differently to bringing future generations into existence. Therefore, we propose to graft Iris Marion Young's Social Connection Model, which is concerned with structural injustice, on to the discussion of responsibility for future generations. Our proposal incorporates the strengths of Unruh's arguments, while also allowing for a differentiated responsibility based on different implications in unjust structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47057,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","volume":"40 4","pages":"642-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/japp.12674","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/japp.12674","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article we argue that duties towards future generations are situated on the collective level and that they should be understood in terms of collective responsibility for structural injustice. In the context of climate change, it seems self-evident that our moral duties pertain not only to the current generation but to future generations as well. However, conceptualizing this leads to the non-identity problem: future persons cannot be harmed by present-day choices because they would not have existed if other choices had been made. Recently, Charlotte Franziska Unruh has proposed a solution that places the duties not on the individual level but on the collective level. The current generation has a responsibility for future generations as a whole. This solution is promising, but we argue that it problematically overlooks the existence of unjust relations within the contemporary collective, as we all contribute differently to bringing future generations into existence. Therefore, we propose to graft Iris Marion Young's Social Connection Model, which is concerned with structural injustice, on to the discussion of responsibility for future generations. Our proposal incorporates the strengths of Unruh's arguments, while also allowing for a differentiated responsibility based on different implications in unjust structures.
在这篇文章中,我们认为,对后代的责任是在集体层面上,他们应该理解为结构性不公正的集体责任。在气候变化的背景下,似乎不言自明的是,我们的道德责任不仅适用于当代人,也适用于子孙后代。然而,将这一点概念化会导致非同一性问题:未来的人不会受到当前选择的伤害,因为如果做出其他选择,他们就不会存在。最近,Charlotte Franziska Unruh提出了一个解决方案,将责任放在集体层面而不是个人层面。当代人对整个后代负有责任。这一解决办法是有希望的,但我们认为,它有问题地忽视了当代集体内部不公正关系的存在,因为我们所有人对后代的存在都作出了不同的贡献。因此,我们建议将Iris Marion Young关注结构性不公正的社会联系模型移植到对后代责任的讨论中。我们的提议结合了Unruh论点的优势,同时也允许根据不公正结构的不同含义区分责任。