Health literacy, behavioral and psychosocial characteristics in coronary artery patients: A hospital-based study in Turkey

IF 0.4 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Asuman Ahcioglu, G. Yılmazel
{"title":"Health literacy, behavioral and psychosocial characteristics in coronary artery patients: A hospital-based study in Turkey","authors":"Asuman Ahcioglu, G. Yılmazel","doi":"10.4103/2221-6189.336577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To investigate health literacy, behavioral and psychosocial characteristics in coronary artery patients. Methods: Between March 2019 and 2020 years, 275 coronary artery patients aged ≥50 years were included in the study. Turkish Health Literacy Scale-32 and Beck Depression Inventory were used to collect the data. Results: General health literacy index score was 31.7 and the prevalence of limited health literacy was 59.3%. Adequate health literacy was 2.8 fold higher in the 50-64 age group, 3.1 fold higher among men, 3.4 fold higher among married and 5.3 fold higher among those who believed in the necessity of individual protective practices (P<0.05). Significant differences were also found in different working status, living places, perceived economic situation, perceived general health status, comorbidities, family history of coronary artery disease, angiography history, material skills on reading and understanding, level of depressive syptom, commitment to individual protective practices health check-ups, utilizing health services, cigarette and alcohol use, and exercise and nutrition between limited and adequate health literacy (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that adequate health literacy was significantly higher among younger patients (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.46-5.62), male gender (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.46-6.58), married (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.39-8.44) and those with belief in individual protective practices (OR: 5.3; 95% CI: 1.93-14.96). Conclusions: Health literacy is poor among coronary artery patients and behavioral and psychosocial variables differ with health literacy levels. To keep cardiovascular health among these patients, health literacy-based interventions should be adopted in coronary artery clinics, especially for risky population.","PeriodicalId":45984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Disease","volume":"11 1","pages":"18 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2221-6189.336577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate health literacy, behavioral and psychosocial characteristics in coronary artery patients. Methods: Between March 2019 and 2020 years, 275 coronary artery patients aged ≥50 years were included in the study. Turkish Health Literacy Scale-32 and Beck Depression Inventory were used to collect the data. Results: General health literacy index score was 31.7 and the prevalence of limited health literacy was 59.3%. Adequate health literacy was 2.8 fold higher in the 50-64 age group, 3.1 fold higher among men, 3.4 fold higher among married and 5.3 fold higher among those who believed in the necessity of individual protective practices (P<0.05). Significant differences were also found in different working status, living places, perceived economic situation, perceived general health status, comorbidities, family history of coronary artery disease, angiography history, material skills on reading and understanding, level of depressive syptom, commitment to individual protective practices health check-ups, utilizing health services, cigarette and alcohol use, and exercise and nutrition between limited and adequate health literacy (P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that adequate health literacy was significantly higher among younger patients (OR: 2.81; 95% CI: 1.46-5.62), male gender (OR: 3.10; 95% CI: 1.46-6.58), married (OR: 3.42; 95% CI: 1.39-8.44) and those with belief in individual protective practices (OR: 5.3; 95% CI: 1.93-14.96). Conclusions: Health literacy is poor among coronary artery patients and behavioral and psychosocial variables differ with health literacy levels. To keep cardiovascular health among these patients, health literacy-based interventions should be adopted in coronary artery clinics, especially for risky population.
冠状动脉患者的健康素养、行为和心理社会特征:土耳其一项基于医院的研究
目的:了解冠心病患者的健康素养、行为和心理社会特征。方法:2019年3月至2020年,275例年龄≥50岁的冠状动脉患者纳入研究。采用土耳其健康素养量表-32和贝克抑郁量表收集数据。结果:一般健康素养指数得分为31.7分,有限健康素养普及率为59.3%。在50-64岁年龄组中,足够的健康知识水平高出2.8倍,在男性中高出3.1倍,在已婚人群中高出3.4倍,在那些认为有必要采取个人保护措施的人群中高出5.3倍(P<0.05)。在不同的工作状态、居住地点、感知的经济状况、感知的一般健康状况、合共病、冠状动脉疾病家族史、血管造影史、阅读和理解材料的技能、抑郁症状水平、个人保护措施健康检查的承诺、利用卫生服务、吸烟和酒精使用、运动和营养方面,有限健康素养与充分健康素养之间也存在显著差异(P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,年轻患者的健康素养明显更高(OR: 2.81;95% CI: 1.46-5.62),男性(OR: 3.10;95% CI: 1.46-6.58),已婚(OR: 3.42;95% CI: 1.39-8.44)和相信个人保护措施的患者(OR: 5.3;95% ci: 1.93-14.96)。结论:冠心病患者的健康素养较差,行为和社会心理变量随健康素养水平的不同而不同。为了保持这些患者的心血管健康,应在冠状动脉诊所采用基于健康素养的干预措施,特别是对高危人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Acute Disease
Journal of Acute Disease CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
自引率
20.00%
发文量
652
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The articles published mainly deal with pre-hospital and hospital emergency medicine, cardiopulmonary-cerebral resuscitation, critical cardiovascular disease, sepsis, severe infection, multiple organ failure, acute and critical diseases in different medical fields, sudden cardiac arrest, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), critical care medicine, disaster rescue medicine (earthquakes, fires, floods, mine disaster, air crash, et al.), acute trauma, acute toxicology, acute heart disease, and related topics. JAD sets up columns for special subjects in each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信