Når styringens ambitioner udfordres af praksis. Om at analysere rummet imellem styringens intentioner og situationel praksis

M. Nielsen, N. Andersen
{"title":"Når styringens ambitioner udfordres af praksis. Om at analysere rummet imellem styringens intentioner og situationel praksis","authors":"M. Nielsen, N. Andersen","doi":"10.22439/DANSOC.V27I1.5127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studier, der analyserer det sociale med inspiration fra Foucaults tanker om governmentality, kritiseres i stigende omfang for at afskaere sig fra at analysere de praktiske relationer, som politisk styring konkret indlejres i. I artiklen tager vi afsaet i denne kritik og viser, med et studie af forholdet mellem et kommunalt jobcenter og et lokalt beskaeftigelsesrad, hvordan governmental magtanalyse kan indfange styringens uforudsigelige, mangefacetterede og immanente karakter ved at fokusere pa styringsintentionernes mode med den praktiske virkelighed, der soges styret. Formelt er radet nedsat til at overvage og kontrollere jobcentret, men i den praktiske relation er det snarere jobcentret, som overvager og kontrollerer radet. Artiklen viser, hvordan dette er muligt ved at analysere jobcentrets arbejde med radet ved hjaelp af en raekke centrale begreber fra Foucaults forfatterskab. Empirisk traekker studiet foruden formelle myndighedsdokumenter, der beskriver radets tiltaenkte rolle, pa praksisinformerende empiri i form af kvalitative interviews og modereferater over en fire-arig periode. \n \n \nENGELSK ABSTRACT: \n \nMathias Herup Nielsen and Niklas Andreas Andersen: When Praxis Challenges the Ambitions of Governing. Analyzing the Space between the Intentions of Governing and Situational Praxis \nStudies working with the Foucauldian concept of ”governmentality” are frequently criticized for their apparent disregard of empirical reality. This article takes this critique as its point of departure and demonstrates the application of the concept of governmentality in a concrete empirical case study in order to grasp the unpredictable and multifaceted nature of modern day power. The case investigated here is the relationship between a Danish Jobcentre and a so-called local employment council (LBR). The latter was created to ”control” and ”monitor” the former organization. However, in practice, it is rather the other way around – the Jobcentre is controlling and monitoring the members of the LBR. This article draws on a number of well-known Foucauldian concepts to show how this relation of power is practically structured. Empirically the article draws on documents from central authorities as well as on a number of qualitative interviews with the actors involved – hence, the article attempts to meet with the dominant overall critique of the governmentality perspective for disregarding empirical reality. \n \nKeywords: governmentality, Michel Foucault, unemployment policy, jobcentre.","PeriodicalId":85215,"journal":{"name":"Nordisk psykologi","volume":"27 1","pages":"14-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordisk psykologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22439/DANSOC.V27I1.5127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Studier, der analyserer det sociale med inspiration fra Foucaults tanker om governmentality, kritiseres i stigende omfang for at afskaere sig fra at analysere de praktiske relationer, som politisk styring konkret indlejres i. I artiklen tager vi afsaet i denne kritik og viser, med et studie af forholdet mellem et kommunalt jobcenter og et lokalt beskaeftigelsesrad, hvordan governmental magtanalyse kan indfange styringens uforudsigelige, mangefacetterede og immanente karakter ved at fokusere pa styringsintentionernes mode med den praktiske virkelighed, der soges styret. Formelt er radet nedsat til at overvage og kontrollere jobcentret, men i den praktiske relation er det snarere jobcentret, som overvager og kontrollerer radet. Artiklen viser, hvordan dette er muligt ved at analysere jobcentrets arbejde med radet ved hjaelp af en raekke centrale begreber fra Foucaults forfatterskab. Empirisk traekker studiet foruden formelle myndighedsdokumenter, der beskriver radets tiltaenkte rolle, pa praksisinformerende empiri i form af kvalitative interviews og modereferater over en fire-arig periode. ENGELSK ABSTRACT: Mathias Herup Nielsen and Niklas Andreas Andersen: When Praxis Challenges the Ambitions of Governing. Analyzing the Space between the Intentions of Governing and Situational Praxis Studies working with the Foucauldian concept of ”governmentality” are frequently criticized for their apparent disregard of empirical reality. This article takes this critique as its point of departure and demonstrates the application of the concept of governmentality in a concrete empirical case study in order to grasp the unpredictable and multifaceted nature of modern day power. The case investigated here is the relationship between a Danish Jobcentre and a so-called local employment council (LBR). The latter was created to ”control” and ”monitor” the former organization. However, in practice, it is rather the other way around – the Jobcentre is controlling and monitoring the members of the LBR. This article draws on a number of well-known Foucauldian concepts to show how this relation of power is practically structured. Empirically the article draws on documents from central authorities as well as on a number of qualitative interviews with the actors involved – hence, the article attempts to meet with the dominant overall critique of the governmentality perspective for disregarding empirical reality. Keywords: governmentality, Michel Foucault, unemployment policy, jobcentre.
当治理的雄心受到实践的挑战时。管理意图与情境实践的空间分析
从福柯的治理思想中汲取灵感来分析社会的研究,越来越多地被批评为没有分析政治治理具体嵌入的实践关系。政府权力分析如何抓住治理的不可预测性、多方面性和内在性,通过关注治理意图的方式和寻求治理的现实。从形式上讲,理事会是为了监督和控制就业中心而设立的,但在实际关系中,它更像是监督和控制理事会的就业中心。这篇文章通过使用福柯著作中的一些关键概念分析就业中心与委员会的工作,展示了这是如何实现的。从经验上讲,除了描述委员会预期作用的正式政府文件外,该研究还利用了四年来以定性访谈和母亲探访的形式提供的实际经验数据。Mathias Herup Nielsen和Niklas Andreas Andersen:当实践挑战治理的雄心时。分析治理意图与情境实践之间的空间运用傅的“治理心态”概念进行的研究经常因其明显无视经验现实而受到批评。本文以这种批评为出发点,通过一个具体的实证案例研究,展示了治理概念的应用,以把握现代权力的不可预测性和多面性。这里调查的案件是丹麦就业中心和所谓的地方就业委员会(LBR)之间的关系。后者是为了“控制”和“监督”前者。然而,在实践中,情况恰恰相反——就业中心控制和监督LBR的成员。这篇文章引用了一些著名的傅概念来展示这种权力关系是如何在实践中构建的。从经验上讲,这篇文章借鉴了中央当局的文件以及对相关行为者的一些定性采访——因此,这篇论文试图应对对政府视角忽视经验现实的总体批评。关键词:政府心态,米歇尔·福柯,失业政策,就业中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书