Rethinking ‘Organizational Effectiveness’ as a Core Premise of Organization Development: Beyond Narrow Organizational Interests and Towards Wider Soulful Interventions

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Andrew Baughen, C. Oswick, Rosie Oswick
{"title":"Rethinking ‘Organizational Effectiveness’ as a Core Premise of Organization Development: Beyond Narrow Organizational Interests and Towards Wider Soulful Interventions","authors":"Andrew Baughen, C. Oswick, Rosie Oswick","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2020.1746684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We contend that the dominant focus within the OD discourse is on organizations and their success (i.e. a preoccupation with ‘organizational effectiveness’) at the expense of wider responsibilities and obligations, and that the framing of ‘organizational health’ is overly narrow and partial (i.e. what is healthy for the organization rather than what is ‘healthy’ at an individual or societal level). We offer some support for our assertion that OD initiatives focus too much on organizational effectiveness and organizational health and we discuss the scope for embracing a wider set of change imperatives. This involves distinguishing between ‘self-ish’ and ‘self-less’ behaviour and drawing a distinction between distributive and generative forms of change activity Finally, we conclude by briefly sketching out how this could take shape in terms of what we have chosen to call ‘soulful interventions’.","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"20 1","pages":"333 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14697017.2020.1746684","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2020.1746684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT We contend that the dominant focus within the OD discourse is on organizations and their success (i.e. a preoccupation with ‘organizational effectiveness’) at the expense of wider responsibilities and obligations, and that the framing of ‘organizational health’ is overly narrow and partial (i.e. what is healthy for the organization rather than what is ‘healthy’ at an individual or societal level). We offer some support for our assertion that OD initiatives focus too much on organizational effectiveness and organizational health and we discuss the scope for embracing a wider set of change imperatives. This involves distinguishing between ‘self-ish’ and ‘self-less’ behaviour and drawing a distinction between distributive and generative forms of change activity Finally, we conclude by briefly sketching out how this could take shape in terms of what we have chosen to call ‘soulful interventions’.
重新思考“组织有效性”作为组织发展的核心前提:超越狭隘的组织利益走向更广泛的灵魂干预
摘要我们认为,OD话语中的主要焦点是组织及其成功(即关注“组织有效性”),而牺牲了更广泛的责任和义务,“组织健康”的框架过于狭隘和片面(即什么对组织来说是健康的,而不是什么在个人或社会层面上是“健康的”)。我们为我们的主张提供了一些支持,即OD倡议过于关注组织有效性和组织健康,我们讨论了接受更广泛的变革要求的范围。这涉及到区分“自私”和“没有自我”的行为,并区分变革活动的分配形式和生成形式。最后,我们简要概述了这种行为是如何形成的,我们选择称之为“深情干预”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信