Comparative Analysis of 16-QAM and 64-QAM Modulation in Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading Channels

Khoirun Ni’amah, M. J. K. Praja, Yuninda Dwianti Marimbun
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of 16-QAM and 64-QAM Modulation in Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading Channels","authors":"Khoirun Ni’amah, M. J. K. Praja, Yuninda Dwianti Marimbun","doi":"10.24114/cess.v7i1.26729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This reseach simulates and analyzes paramaters bit error rate (BER) of 16-QAM and 64-QAM modulation on Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading channels. This research aims to determine 5G modulation with the level of data quality after the transmission process is carried out. The modulation simulation results obtained will be compared with the theoretical bit error rate (BER). The simulation results obtained from the two channel scenarios used are 16-QAM modulation reaching BER 10-4, AWGN channel only requires 15 dB Eb/N0 and for Rayleigh Fading channel it requires 38 dB Eb/N0. The BER theoretical results obtained for the 16-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 3 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 5 dB. Then, the simulation results of 64-QAM modulation AWGN channel to achieve BER 10-4 requires Eb/N0 of 24.6 dB, Rayleigh Fading of 47 dB. The theoretical results of BER obtained for the 64-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 1 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 0.5 dB. In this study, between 16-QAM and 64-QAM 5G modulation is more suitable to use 16-QAM modulation because it requires less power to achieve the desired BER 10-4.","PeriodicalId":53361,"journal":{"name":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v7i1.26729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This reseach simulates and analyzes paramaters bit error rate (BER) of 16-QAM and 64-QAM modulation on Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading channels. This research aims to determine 5G modulation with the level of data quality after the transmission process is carried out. The modulation simulation results obtained will be compared with the theoretical bit error rate (BER). The simulation results obtained from the two channel scenarios used are 16-QAM modulation reaching BER 10-4, AWGN channel only requires 15 dB Eb/N0 and for Rayleigh Fading channel it requires 38 dB Eb/N0. The BER theoretical results obtained for the 16-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 3 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 5 dB. Then, the simulation results of 64-QAM modulation AWGN channel to achieve BER 10-4 requires Eb/N0 of 24.6 dB, Rayleigh Fading of 47 dB. The theoretical results of BER obtained for the 64-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 1 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 0.5 dB. In this study, between 16-QAM and 64-QAM 5G modulation is more suitable to use 16-QAM modulation because it requires less power to achieve the desired BER 10-4.
加性高斯白噪声和瑞利衰落信道中16-QAM和64-QAM调制的比较分析
本研究模拟分析了16-QAM和64-QAM调制在加性高斯白噪声和瑞利衰落信道上的参数误码率。本研究旨在确定5G调制与传输过程后的数据质量水平。将获得的调制模拟结果与理论误码率(BER)进行比较。从使用的两种信道场景中获得的模拟结果是达到BER 10-4的16-QAM调制,AWGN信道只需要15dB Eb/N0,对于瑞利衰落信道,它需要38dB Eb/NO。AWGN信道的16-QAM调制的BER理论结果与仿真结果相差3dB,而瑞利衰落信道的BER为5dB。然后,对64-QAM调制AWGN信道实现BER 10-4的仿真结果要求Eb/N0为24.6dB,瑞利衰落为47dB。AWGN信道的64-QAM调制的BER理论结果与仿真结果相差1dB,而瑞利衰落信道的BER为0.5dB。在本研究中,在16-QAM和64-QAM之间,5G调制更适合使用16-QAM调制,因为它需要更少的功率来实现所需的BER 10-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信