La calidad de la democracia. Examen de sus fundamentos conceptuales a comienzos del siglo XXI.

M. Rojas-Betancur, Mauricio Bocanument-Arbeláez, Dany Esteban Gallego-Quiceno, M. Pineda-Carreño
{"title":"La calidad de la democracia. Examen de sus fundamentos conceptuales a comienzos del siglo XXI.","authors":"M. Rojas-Betancur, Mauricio Bocanument-Arbeláez, Dany Esteban Gallego-Quiceno, M. Pineda-Carreño","doi":"10.22518/usergioa/jour/ccsh/2018.1/a07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently one of the most relevant fields in the study of democracy is its quality. Therefore, conceptual assumptions were formulated to define it as a starting point and dialogue between various authors. Additionally, a literature review was made about the development and evolution of this concept. The tracking was conducted to investigate about \"quality of democracy\" and which factors and indicators have been used to measure its usefulness. The findings showed that the studies on democracy start from an operative definition based on the concept of polyarchy, which has allowed it to delimit its object of study and focus on institutional aspects under conceptual postulates from at least three different analysis approaches. \nRetraction Note: \"The Editors have retracted this article because do not fulfill the editorial protocol of peer review process\"","PeriodicalId":30087,"journal":{"name":"Civilizar","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civilizar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22518/usergioa/jour/ccsh/2018.1/a07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Currently one of the most relevant fields in the study of democracy is its quality. Therefore, conceptual assumptions were formulated to define it as a starting point and dialogue between various authors. Additionally, a literature review was made about the development and evolution of this concept. The tracking was conducted to investigate about "quality of democracy" and which factors and indicators have been used to measure its usefulness. The findings showed that the studies on democracy start from an operative definition based on the concept of polyarchy, which has allowed it to delimit its object of study and focus on institutional aspects under conceptual postulates from at least three different analysis approaches. Retraction Note: "The Editors have retracted this article because do not fulfill the editorial protocol of peer review process"
民主的质量。审查其在21世纪初的概念基础。
目前,民主研究中最相关的领域之一是民主的质量。因此,提出了概念性假设,将其定义为不同作者之间的起点和对话。此外,还对这一概念的发展和演变进行了文献综述。进行跟踪是为了调查“民主质量”,以及哪些因素和指标被用来衡量其有用性。研究结果表明,对民主的研究始于一个基于多元政体概念的操作定义,这使它能够从至少三种不同的分析方法中界定其研究对象,并在概念假设下关注制度方面。撤回说明:“编辑撤回了这篇文章,因为不符合同行评审程序的编辑协议”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信