Re-ensiling effects on inoculated sorghum: Intake, apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance, and animal feeding behaviour

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Flávia Cristina de Oliveira e Silva, Naiara Taís Alves da Silva, Joana Ribeiro da Glória, João Carlos de Freitas Alves, Ana Luiza da Costa Cruz Borges, Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves, José Avelino Santos Rodrigues, Diogo Gonzaga Jayme
{"title":"Re-ensiling effects on inoculated sorghum: Intake, apparent digestibility, nitrogen balance, and animal feeding behaviour","authors":"Flávia Cristina de Oliveira e Silva,&nbsp;Naiara Taís Alves da Silva,&nbsp;Joana Ribeiro da Glória,&nbsp;João Carlos de Freitas Alves,&nbsp;Ana Luiza da Costa Cruz Borges,&nbsp;Lúcio Carlos Gonçalves,&nbsp;José Avelino Santos Rodrigues,&nbsp;Diogo Gonzaga Jayme","doi":"10.1111/gfs.12611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to determine whether using inoculants and re-ensiling in sorghum silages affect the intake and feeding behaviour, apparent digestibility, digestible energy, and nitrogen balance of sheep in maintenance. Half the sorghum was inoculated on the day of harvest, and the other half received the same inoculation volume but with water. Sorghum was ensiled in 100 experimental metal drum silos of 200 L covered with plastic: 50 silos with inoculants and 50 without them. After 56 days, 25 drums with inoculants and 25 without were exposed to air for 48 h. The other silos remained closed. The treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme with inoculation and re-ensiling. The sheep received the silages after 211 days of ensiling and 155 days of re-ensiling to determine the intake, apparent digestibility, and feeding behaviour of animals. The experimental design was a simultaneous double 4 × 4 Latin square. The re-ensiling process increased silage pH, N-NH<sub>3</sub>.TN<sup>−1</sup>, butyric acid, and propionic acid. The inoculant increased propionic acid in ensiled and re-ensiled silages. Lactic acid concentration presented a statistical interaction with the inoculated and ensiled silage, 58% higher than the other treatment averages. The ADFap digestibility showed a complex interaction, in which the control ensiled and the inoculated and re-ensiled silages were about 35% lower than the inoculated ensiled silage. The Nbal:Nint ratio (g.g<sup>−1</sup>) in the inoculated and re-ensiled silage had lower nitrogen retention than intake compared with the other treatments. These results indicate that exposing inoculated silages to air does not compromise their use in sheep feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12767,"journal":{"name":"Grass and Forage Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Grass and Forage Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gfs.12611","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether using inoculants and re-ensiling in sorghum silages affect the intake and feeding behaviour, apparent digestibility, digestible energy, and nitrogen balance of sheep in maintenance. Half the sorghum was inoculated on the day of harvest, and the other half received the same inoculation volume but with water. Sorghum was ensiled in 100 experimental metal drum silos of 200 L covered with plastic: 50 silos with inoculants and 50 without them. After 56 days, 25 drums with inoculants and 25 without were exposed to air for 48 h. The other silos remained closed. The treatments were arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial scheme with inoculation and re-ensiling. The sheep received the silages after 211 days of ensiling and 155 days of re-ensiling to determine the intake, apparent digestibility, and feeding behaviour of animals. The experimental design was a simultaneous double 4 × 4 Latin square. The re-ensiling process increased silage pH, N-NH3.TN−1, butyric acid, and propionic acid. The inoculant increased propionic acid in ensiled and re-ensiled silages. Lactic acid concentration presented a statistical interaction with the inoculated and ensiled silage, 58% higher than the other treatment averages. The ADFap digestibility showed a complex interaction, in which the control ensiled and the inoculated and re-ensiled silages were about 35% lower than the inoculated ensiled silage. The Nbal:Nint ratio (g.g−1) in the inoculated and re-ensiled silage had lower nitrogen retention than intake compared with the other treatments. These results indicate that exposing inoculated silages to air does not compromise their use in sheep feeding.

再青贮对接种高粱的影响:摄取量、表观消化率、氮平衡和动物摄食行为
本试验旨在研究在高粱青贮中添加接种剂和复青贮是否会影响维持期绵羊的采食行为、表观消化率、可消化能和氮平衡。一半高粱在收获当天接种,另一半高粱接种量相同,但有水。高粱在100个200升的金属筒仓中青贮,其中50个仓加了接种剂,50个仓不加接种剂。56天后,加入接种剂的25个桶和未加入接种剂的25个桶在空气中暴露48 h。其他筒仓仍然关闭。采用接种和复青贮的2 × 2因子处理方案。青贮211 d和再青贮155 d后饲喂青贮,测定采食量、表观消化率和动物摄食行为。实验设计为同时双4 × 4拉丁方格。复青贮提高了青贮料pH、N-NH3。TN−1、丁酸、丙酸。接种剂增加了青贮和复青贮青贮中丙酸的含量。乳酸浓度与接种青贮和青贮之间存在统计学上的交互作用,比其他处理的平均值高58%。ADFap消化率表现出复杂的交互作用,其中对照青贮和再青贮的青贮比再青贮的青贮低35%左右。与其他处理相比,接种和复青贮青贮的氮氮比(g.g−1)低于采氮量。这些结果表明,将接种的青贮饲料暴露在空气中不会影响其在绵羊饲养中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Grass and Forage Science
Grass and Forage Science 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Grass and Forage Science is a major English language journal that publishes the results of research and development in all aspects of grass and forage production, management and utilization; reviews of the state of knowledge on relevant topics; and book reviews. Authors are also invited to submit papers on non-agricultural aspects of grassland management such as recreational and amenity use and the environmental implications of all grassland systems. The Journal considers papers from all climatic zones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信