Navigating Paradoxical Tensions in the Context of Coopetition: Emotional Transcendence in a Dutch Public–Private Partnership

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
T. Fiorito, C. Nagel, M. Veenswijk, I. Drori
{"title":"Navigating Paradoxical Tensions in the Context of Coopetition: Emotional Transcendence in a Dutch Public–Private Partnership","authors":"T. Fiorito, C. Nagel, M. Veenswijk, I. Drori","doi":"10.1080/14697017.2023.2197908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Transcendence has been recognized as the most effective response to paradox, yet it is perhaps also the most demanding. This article explores how organizational actors transcend paradoxical tensions that arise when simultaneously pursuing cooperation and competition. Drawing on a case study of a Dutch public–private partnership in which law enforcement agencies and financial firms collaborate to combat serious and organized crime, we examined the paradoxical tensions experienced by those involved in this coopetitive alliance and their efforts to transcend the conflicting emotions that arise from these tensions. Our study suggests that transcending such emotional ambivalence involves not only the enactment of different rhetorical and behavioural practices, but also various emotional practices, which we have termed emotional transcendence. These emotional practices vary in their focus (individual, group, organizational), and are used alternately and interchangeably with rhetoric and behaviour to transcend emotional ambivalence. By exploring the paradoxical emotions in a unique coopetitive setting, we contribute to the literature on emotions and paradox and open up interesting avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":47003,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","volume":"23 1","pages":"177 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CHANGE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14697017.2023.2197908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Transcendence has been recognized as the most effective response to paradox, yet it is perhaps also the most demanding. This article explores how organizational actors transcend paradoxical tensions that arise when simultaneously pursuing cooperation and competition. Drawing on a case study of a Dutch public–private partnership in which law enforcement agencies and financial firms collaborate to combat serious and organized crime, we examined the paradoxical tensions experienced by those involved in this coopetitive alliance and their efforts to transcend the conflicting emotions that arise from these tensions. Our study suggests that transcending such emotional ambivalence involves not only the enactment of different rhetorical and behavioural practices, but also various emotional practices, which we have termed emotional transcendence. These emotional practices vary in their focus (individual, group, organizational), and are used alternately and interchangeably with rhetoric and behaviour to transcend emotional ambivalence. By exploring the paradoxical emotions in a unique coopetitive setting, we contribute to the literature on emotions and paradox and open up interesting avenues for future research.
在合作的背景下驾驭矛盾的紧张关系:荷兰公私合作伙伴关系中的情感超越
超越被认为是对悖论最有效的回应,但它也可能是最苛刻的。本文探讨了组织参与者如何超越同时追求合作和竞争时产生的矛盾紧张关系。通过对荷兰公私合作伙伴关系(执法机构和金融公司合作打击严重的有组织犯罪)的案例研究,我们研究了参与这种合作联盟的人所经历的矛盾紧张关系,以及他们为超越这些紧张关系所产生的冲突情绪所做的努力。我们的研究表明,超越这种情感矛盾不仅涉及制定不同的修辞和行为实践,还涉及各种情感实践,我们称之为情感超越。这些情感实践的重点各不相同(个人、团体、组织),并且与修辞和行为交替使用,以超越情感矛盾。通过在独特的合作环境中探索矛盾情绪,我们为情绪和矛盾的文献做出了贡献,并为未来的研究开辟了有趣的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Journal of Change Management is a multidisciplinary and international forum for critical, mainstream and alternative contributions - focusing as much on psychology, ethics, culture and behaviour as on structure and process. JCM is a platform for open and challenging dialogue and a thorough critique of established as well as alternative practices. JCM is aiming to provide all authors with a first decision within six weeks of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信