Uma reflexão sobre o papel das preposições na distinção entre complementos nominais de substantivos e adjuntos adnominais preposicionados

A. K. C. D. E. Pinho, Sueli Maria Coelho
{"title":"Uma reflexão sobre o papel das preposições na distinção entre complementos nominais de substantivos e adjuntos adnominais preposicionados","authors":"A. K. C. D. E. Pinho, Sueli Maria Coelho","doi":"10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v21i2p191-209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The similar way in which the noun complements of substantives and the prepositional noun adjuncts are presented, usually causes some embarrassment in the distinction of these sentence terms for categorization purposes. Normative and pedagogical manuals tend to anchor this distinction in the concreteness/abstraction of the noun that precedes the preposition and in the agentivity of the prepositional term, which follows from an analogy with the use of certain prepositions together with the genitive and dative cases of Latin for the purposes of clarity. Thus, this work sought, from a bibliographic analysis in Latin and Portuguese manuals, to elucidate the distinction between these two terms and to propose a merely syntactic criterium to distinguish them. The analysis was delimited to the prepositional terms that bind to substantive nouns and the hypothesis was explored that the type of preposition could be relevant to determine the syntactic function considering the classification of the essential and accidental prepositions. The results obtained indicate that there is a distinction between the two terms, but that this derives not from the type of preposition that heads it, but from the property of the substantive noun to require or only admit a prepositional term.","PeriodicalId":30297,"journal":{"name":"Filologia e Linguistica Portuguesa","volume":"21 1","pages":"191-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filologia e Linguistica Portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-9419.v21i2p191-209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The similar way in which the noun complements of substantives and the prepositional noun adjuncts are presented, usually causes some embarrassment in the distinction of these sentence terms for categorization purposes. Normative and pedagogical manuals tend to anchor this distinction in the concreteness/abstraction of the noun that precedes the preposition and in the agentivity of the prepositional term, which follows from an analogy with the use of certain prepositions together with the genitive and dative cases of Latin for the purposes of clarity. Thus, this work sought, from a bibliographic analysis in Latin and Portuguese manuals, to elucidate the distinction between these two terms and to propose a merely syntactic criterium to distinguish them. The analysis was delimited to the prepositional terms that bind to substantive nouns and the hypothesis was explored that the type of preposition could be relevant to determine the syntactic function considering the classification of the essential and accidental prepositions. The results obtained indicate that there is a distinction between the two terms, but that this derives not from the type of preposition that heads it, but from the property of the substantive noun to require or only admit a prepositional term.
介词在名词补语和介词形容词区别中的作用思考
实质词的名词补语和介词名词附加词的表达方式相似,通常会导致出于分类目的对这些句子术语进行区分时出现一些尴尬。规范性和教学手册倾向于将这种区别锚定在介词前名词的具体性/抽象性以及介词术语的能动性上,为了清晰起见,这是通过与某些介词的使用以及拉丁语的属格和与格进行类比得出的。因此,这项工作试图从拉丁语和葡萄牙语手册中的书目分析中阐明这两个术语之间的区别,并提出一个仅用于区分它们的句法标准。分析局限于与实体名词结合的介词术语,并探讨了介词类型可能与确定句法功能相关的假设,考虑到本质介词和偶然介词的分类。研究结果表明,这两个名词之间存在区别,但这不是源于介词的类型,而是源于实体名词要求或只允许介词名词的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信