Consistency or contrast of Seyyed Abdul Aala Sabzevari's view with the theory of Tafkik regarding the relationship between philosophy and narration.

Abstract

AbstractSeyyed Abdul Aala Sabzevari, one of the great contemporary thinkers, is not only a commentator on transcendent wisdom but also a critic of Mulla Sadra's views on many philosophical principles and issues. His critical position on various issues of transcendent philosophy and emphasis on the use of the Qur'an and Sunnah, as well as the comparison of the early years of his education in Mashhad with the establishment of ideas of school of separation(Tafkik);caused to consider to Seyyed Sabzevari as a separation cractable, and as a result has not been given the necessary attention to his philosophical and theological thoughts. But, can Seyyed Sabzevari be considered a follower of this school? The answer is no. Although the promise of verbal sharing, originality of nature, denial of the unity of existence, and some other issues, as well as some of his positions on the separation of reason and quotation, bring Sabzevari closer to school of separation(Tafkik)beliefs, but he has a special and different method from what is presented in the school of separation(Tafkik), in use of quotation and to seek help from reason In understanding the Qur'an and Sunnah,. The present article responds to the above doubt by examining the opinions of Sabzevari professors and analyzing the extent of their influence, comparing and analyzing the ideas of Sabzevari with the opinions of thinkers of the school of separation(Tafkik) and the differences between them in explaining the Qur'an and Sunnah.