{"title":"Should I Bribe? Re-Examining the Greasing-the-Wheels Hypothesis in Democratic Post-Soeharto Indonesia","authors":"I. Kurniawan, R. Riyanto","doi":"10.47291/EFI.V66I2.792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the Soeharto Era corruption was considered to grease the wheels of growth in Indonesia, a country once considered to be the most corrupt country in the world. Indonesia began to experience instantaneous decentralization and democratization after the Soeharto Era abruptly ended. While vastly celebrated, these episodes have their unintended consequence: coercive regulation. We employed the extensive firm-level Large and Medium Manufacturing (Industri Besar Sedang/IBS) census data combined with the Indonesian Democracy Index (Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia/IDI) at provincial level spanning from 2009 to 2015 and found that bribery hampered Indonesian firm output and productivity growth by 9.8% and 12.6%, respectively. These results suggest that the greasing effect has now diminished. Interestingly, we also found that firms located in a province with a better democracy index may experience less damaging effects of corruption. In other words, two firms paying the same value of bribe may obtain different effects depending on where they are located.","PeriodicalId":31064,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Finance in Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Finance in Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47291/EFI.V66I2.792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
During the Soeharto Era corruption was considered to grease the wheels of growth in Indonesia, a country once considered to be the most corrupt country in the world. Indonesia began to experience instantaneous decentralization and democratization after the Soeharto Era abruptly ended. While vastly celebrated, these episodes have their unintended consequence: coercive regulation. We employed the extensive firm-level Large and Medium Manufacturing (Industri Besar Sedang/IBS) census data combined with the Indonesian Democracy Index (Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia/IDI) at provincial level spanning from 2009 to 2015 and found that bribery hampered Indonesian firm output and productivity growth by 9.8% and 12.6%, respectively. These results suggest that the greasing effect has now diminished. Interestingly, we also found that firms located in a province with a better democracy index may experience less damaging effects of corruption. In other words, two firms paying the same value of bribe may obtain different effects depending on where they are located.
在苏哈托时代,腐败被认为是印尼增长的动力,印尼曾被认为是世界上最腐败的国家。苏哈托时代突然结束后,印度尼西亚开始经历瞬时的权力下放和民主化。这些事件虽然广受赞誉,但却带来了意想不到的后果:强制性监管。我们采用了2009年至2015年期间广泛的企业级大中型制造业(Industri Besar Sedang/IBS)人口普查数据,结合印度尼西亚省级民主指数(Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia/IDI),发现贿赂分别阻碍了印尼企业产出和生产力增长9.8%和12.6%。这些结果表明,润滑效果现在已经减弱。有趣的是,我们还发现,位于民主指数较好的省份的公司可能会受到较少的腐败破坏。换句话说,两个公司支付相同价值的贿赂可能会根据其所在地的不同而获得不同的效果。