Evaluation of the Investigator 26plex QS and SureID PanGlobal systems in forensic analysis and comparison with commonly used NGM PCR Amplification Kit

Q4 Medicine
Magdalena Marcińska, Agnieszka Parys-Proszek, Maria Wróbel
{"title":"Evaluation of the Investigator 26plex QS and SureID PanGlobal systems in forensic analysis and comparison with commonly used NGM PCR Amplification Kit","authors":"Magdalena Marcińska, Agnieszka Parys-Proszek, Maria Wróbel","doi":"10.4467/12307483pfs.22.005.16306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the study was to evaluate the novel kits – Investigator 26plex QS and SureID PanGlobal in forensic analysis and confront with commonly applied NGM PCR Amplification Kit. The internal validation study involved sensitivity, reliability, stochastic, DNA mixtures, inhibition parameters analysis and 15 casework samples extracted from blood, saliva, semen, tooth, bones, soft tissue and epithelial cells. The sensitivity experiments were performed on a total of 24 samples from seven serial dilutions of 007 control DNA. Mixture analysis was performed for two persons in different proportions using 9947 and 007 control DNA. Inhibition effect was tested using PCR inhibitor – humic acid. Among three compared kits the highest sensitivity was noted for Investigator 26plex QS considering the total number of the markers in each system, as well as the shared set of markers. However, low PCR efficiency of D6S1043 locus was observed with aforementioned kit. Mixture analysis performed with Investigator 26plex QS, SureID Pan Global and NGM kits, considering shared set of markers revealed that NGM Kit is the most sensitive for detecting minor components in a mixture. Similarly, we demonstrated that NGM is the most successful in the analysis of challenging forensic samples. The internal validation showed that the Investigator 26plex QS and SureID PanGlobal have weaker performance for routine forensic application in comparison to NGM Kit. However, thanks to increased number of markers, these systems could be helpful in analysis of complex cases in paternity testing and kinship analysis, in which standard genetic analysis is insufficient.","PeriodicalId":52546,"journal":{"name":"Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483pfs.22.005.16306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the novel kits – Investigator 26plex QS and SureID PanGlobal in forensic analysis and confront with commonly applied NGM PCR Amplification Kit. The internal validation study involved sensitivity, reliability, stochastic, DNA mixtures, inhibition parameters analysis and 15 casework samples extracted from blood, saliva, semen, tooth, bones, soft tissue and epithelial cells. The sensitivity experiments were performed on a total of 24 samples from seven serial dilutions of 007 control DNA. Mixture analysis was performed for two persons in different proportions using 9947 and 007 control DNA. Inhibition effect was tested using PCR inhibitor – humic acid. Among three compared kits the highest sensitivity was noted for Investigator 26plex QS considering the total number of the markers in each system, as well as the shared set of markers. However, low PCR efficiency of D6S1043 locus was observed with aforementioned kit. Mixture analysis performed with Investigator 26plex QS, SureID Pan Global and NGM kits, considering shared set of markers revealed that NGM Kit is the most sensitive for detecting minor components in a mixture. Similarly, we demonstrated that NGM is the most successful in the analysis of challenging forensic samples. The internal validation showed that the Investigator 26plex QS and SureID PanGlobal have weaker performance for routine forensic application in comparison to NGM Kit. However, thanks to increased number of markers, these systems could be helpful in analysis of complex cases in paternity testing and kinship analysis, in which standard genetic analysis is insufficient.
评价调查员26plex QS和SureID pangglobal系统在法医分析中的应用,并与常用的NGM PCR扩增试剂盒进行比较
本研究的目的是评估新型试剂盒-调查员26plex QS和SureID PanGlobal在法医分析中的应用,并与常用的NGM PCR扩增试剂盒进行比较。内部验证研究包括敏感性、可靠性、随机性、DNA混合物、抑制参数分析以及从血液、唾液、精液、牙齿、骨骼、软组织和上皮细胞中提取的15个案例样本。敏感性实验对007对照DNA的7个系列稀释共24个样品进行。用9947和007对照DNA对两个人进行不同比例的混合分析。用PCR抑制剂腐植酸检测其抑制效果。在三个比较试剂盒中,考虑到每个系统中标记物的总数,以及共享的标记物集,研究者26plex QS的灵敏度最高。但D6S1043位点的PCR效率较低。使用调查员26plex QS、SureID Pan Global和NGM试剂盒进行混合物分析,考虑到共享的一组标记,NGM试剂盒对检测混合物中的微量成分最敏感。同样,我们证明了NGM在具有挑战性的法医样本分析中是最成功的。内部验证表明,与NGM Kit相比,调查者26plex QS和SureID PanGlobal在常规法医应用中的性能较弱。然而,由于标记数量的增加,这些系统可以帮助分析在亲子鉴定和亲属分析中复杂的病例,在标准的遗传分析是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych
Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书