Introduction to the Suite of Papers: A Conversation with Harry Brighouse, David Bakhurst, and Sheron Fraser-Burgess on Gareth B. Matthews, The Child’s Philosopher, edited by Maughn Rollins Gregory and Megan Jane Laverty

IF 0.8 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
M. Gregory, M. Laverty
{"title":"Introduction to the Suite of Papers: A Conversation with Harry Brighouse, David Bakhurst, and Sheron Fraser-Burgess on Gareth B. Matthews, The Child’s Philosopher, edited by Maughn Rollins Gregory and Megan Jane Laverty","authors":"M. Gregory, M. Laverty","doi":"10.1093/jopedu/qhad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gareth B. Matthews (1929-2011) was a specialist in ancient and medieval philosophy whose conversations with young children led him to discover their penchant for philosophical thinking, which often enriched his own. Those conversations became the impetus for a substantial component of Matthews’ scholarship, from which our book, Gareth B. Matthews, The Child’s Philosopher, features essays spanning the length of his career. Contemporary contributors to the book critically evaluate Matthews’ scholarship, in three fields he helped to initiate: philosophy in children’s literature, philosophy for children, and philosophy of childhood. They assess where he broke new ground and identify developments and debates in those fields. In the reviews that follow, Harry Brighouse, David Bakhurst, and Sharon Fraser-Burgess respond to Matthews’ original essays and those of the contemporary scholars. While recognizing Matthews’ significant contribution to advancing philosophy in the lives of children, all three reviewers indicate ways to push his agenda forward. We read Brighouse as calling for engagement with philosophy in media (including television and film) beyond classical and contemporary children’s literature. Bakhurst explicitly calls for further empirical study of children’s philosophical thinking to support more realistic conceptions of childhood and philosophy—including when philosophy might not be appropriate for children. Fraser-Burgess calls for an accounting of the ways that philosophy for children may reinscribe unjust hierarchies of race, gender, and culture and of the ways it can be used to confront and combat them.","PeriodicalId":47223,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jopedu/qhad033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gareth B. Matthews (1929-2011) was a specialist in ancient and medieval philosophy whose conversations with young children led him to discover their penchant for philosophical thinking, which often enriched his own. Those conversations became the impetus for a substantial component of Matthews’ scholarship, from which our book, Gareth B. Matthews, The Child’s Philosopher, features essays spanning the length of his career. Contemporary contributors to the book critically evaluate Matthews’ scholarship, in three fields he helped to initiate: philosophy in children’s literature, philosophy for children, and philosophy of childhood. They assess where he broke new ground and identify developments and debates in those fields. In the reviews that follow, Harry Brighouse, David Bakhurst, and Sharon Fraser-Burgess respond to Matthews’ original essays and those of the contemporary scholars. While recognizing Matthews’ significant contribution to advancing philosophy in the lives of children, all three reviewers indicate ways to push his agenda forward. We read Brighouse as calling for engagement with philosophy in media (including television and film) beyond classical and contemporary children’s literature. Bakhurst explicitly calls for further empirical study of children’s philosophical thinking to support more realistic conceptions of childhood and philosophy—including when philosophy might not be appropriate for children. Fraser-Burgess calls for an accounting of the ways that philosophy for children may reinscribe unjust hierarchies of race, gender, and culture and of the ways it can be used to confront and combat them.
《文集导言:与哈里·布里豪斯、大卫·巴克赫斯特和谢伦·弗雷泽-伯吉斯谈加雷思·b·马修斯的《儿童哲学家》,由莫恩·罗林斯·格雷戈里和梅根·简·拉弗蒂编辑
加雷斯·B·马修斯(Gareth B.Matthews,1929-2011)是一位古代和中世纪哲学专家,他与幼儿的对话使他发现了他们对哲学思维的偏好,这往往丰富了他自己的思想。这些对话成为了马修斯学术的重要组成部分,我们的书《儿童哲学家加雷斯·B·马修斯》以他职业生涯中的散文为特色。这本书的当代撰稿人批判性地评价了马修斯的学术,他帮助开创了三个领域:儿童文学哲学、儿童哲学和儿童哲学。他们评估他在哪里开拓了新的领域,并确定了这些领域的发展和辩论。在接下来的评论中,Harry Brighouse、David Bakhurst和Sharon Fraser Burgess回应了Matthews和当代学者的原创文章。在承认马修斯对推动儿童生活哲学的重大贡献的同时,三位评论家都指出了推动他的议程的方法。我们读到布里格豪斯呼吁在古典和当代儿童文学之外的媒体(包括电视和电影)中融入哲学。巴克赫斯特明确呼吁对儿童的哲学思维进行进一步的实证研究,以支持更现实的童年和哲学概念,包括当哲学可能不适合儿童时。Fraser Burgess呼吁对儿童哲学可能重新确立种族、性别和文化的不公正等级制度的方式进行说明,并说明它可以用来对抗和打击这些制度的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Journal of Philosophy of Education publishes articles representing a wide variety of philosophical traditions. They vary from examination of fundamental philosophical issues in their connection with education, to detailed critical engagement with current educational practice or policy from a philosophical point of view. The journal aims to promote rigorous thinking on educational matters and to identify and criticise the ideological forces shaping education. Ethical, political, aesthetic and epistemological dimensions of educational theory are amongst those covered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信