Transcultural Translation and Reliability of Cyberbullying and Online Aggression Survey Instrument: Thai Version

Tanatnuch Wongchinsri, Kusalaporn Chaiudomsom, Nawanant Piyavhatkul, Siriwan Piyawattanametha, Wallapa Bunpromma
{"title":"Transcultural Translation and Reliability of Cyberbullying and Online Aggression Survey Instrument: Thai Version","authors":"Tanatnuch Wongchinsri, Kusalaporn Chaiudomsom, Nawanant Piyavhatkul, Siriwan Piyawattanametha, Wallapa Bunpromma","doi":"10.25133/jpssv302022.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to translate a screening instrument for cyberbullying, Cyberbullying and Online Aggression Survey (COAS), to Thai, then test for its internal consistency and report the prevalence of cyberbullying. The COAS is an original instrument self-report Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of 18 questions with two subscales (9 items each), including Cyberbullying Victimization (CV) and Cyberbullying Offending (CO) scales. The COAS was transculturally translated into a Thai version by forward-backward processes then the content validity was evaluated by six child and adolescent psychiatrists. The internal consistency was explored with secondary school students aged 12 to 18 years in Khon Kaen, a province in Northeastern Thailand. The results showed that the content validity index of the COAS-Thai was 1, and the index of item-objective congruence was 0.67–1.00. From 234 participants, Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.82, with 0.77 for CV and 0.69 for CO subscales. As high as 44.87% reported being involved in a cyberbullying incidence. In conclusion, the COAS-Thai had acceptable reliability, and almost half of the participants reported being involved in cyberbullying. However, future studies are required to improve the quality of the cyberbullying survey in the context of Thai society.","PeriodicalId":85846,"journal":{"name":"Warasan prachakon lae sangkhom = Journal of population and social studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Warasan prachakon lae sangkhom = Journal of population and social studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25133/jpssv302022.036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to translate a screening instrument for cyberbullying, Cyberbullying and Online Aggression Survey (COAS), to Thai, then test for its internal consistency and report the prevalence of cyberbullying. The COAS is an original instrument self-report Likert-scale questionnaire consisting of 18 questions with two subscales (9 items each), including Cyberbullying Victimization (CV) and Cyberbullying Offending (CO) scales. The COAS was transculturally translated into a Thai version by forward-backward processes then the content validity was evaluated by six child and adolescent psychiatrists. The internal consistency was explored with secondary school students aged 12 to 18 years in Khon Kaen, a province in Northeastern Thailand. The results showed that the content validity index of the COAS-Thai was 1, and the index of item-objective congruence was 0.67–1.00. From 234 participants, Cronbach’s Alpha was 0.82, with 0.77 for CV and 0.69 for CO subscales. As high as 44.87% reported being involved in a cyberbullying incidence. In conclusion, the COAS-Thai had acceptable reliability, and almost half of the participants reported being involved in cyberbullying. However, future studies are required to improve the quality of the cyberbullying survey in the context of Thai society.
跨文化翻译与网络欺凌与网络攻击的信度调查工具:泰文版
本研究旨在将网络欺凌筛查工具——网络欺凌和网络攻击调查(COAS)翻译成泰语,然后测试其内部一致性,并报告网络欺凌的流行率。COAS是一份原始的工具自我报告Likert量表,由18个问题组成,每个问题有两个分量表(9个项目),包括网络欺凌受害者(CV)和网络欺凌犯罪(CO)量表。通过前后向过程将COAS跨文化翻译成泰语版本,然后由六名儿童和青少年精神病学家评估内容的有效性。在泰国东北部的孔敬省,对12至18岁的中学生进行了内部一致性研究。结果表明,COAS泰语的内容有效性指数为1,项目-目标一致性指数为0.67–1.00。在234名参与者中,Cronbachα为0.82,CV为0.77,CO分量表为0.69。高达44.87%的人表示曾参与过网络欺凌事件。总之,泰国行动委员会具有可接受的可靠性,几乎一半的参与者报告称参与了网络欺凌。然而,未来的研究需要在泰国社会的背景下提高网络欺凌调查的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书