Retelling stories: The validity of an online oral narrative task

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
G. Gillon, Brigid C McNeill, Amy Scott, Megan E. Gath, Marleen F. Westerveld
{"title":"Retelling stories: The validity of an online oral narrative task","authors":"G. Gillon, Brigid C McNeill, Amy Scott, Megan E. Gath, Marleen F. Westerveld","doi":"10.1177/02656590231155861","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the validity of data collected from a novel online story retell task. The task was specifically designed for use by junior school teachers with the support of speech–language therapists or literacy specialists. The assessment task was developed to monitor children's oral language progress in their first year at school as part of the Better Start Literacy Approach for early literacy teaching. Teachers administered the task to 303 5-year-olds in New Zealand at school entry and after 20 weeks and 12 months of schooling. The children listened to a story with pictures via iPad presentation and were then prompted to retell the story. The children's spontaneous language used in their story retell was captured and uploaded digitally via iPad audio recording and analyzed using semi-automated speech recognition and computer software. Their responses to factual and inferential story comprehension questions were also analyzed. The data suggested that the task has good criterion validity. Significant correlations between story retell measures and a standardized measure of children's oral language were found. The Better Start Literacy Approach story retell task, which took approximately 6 min for teachers to administer, accurately identified children with low oral language ability 81% of the time. Growth curve analysis revealed that the task was useful for monitoring oral language development, including for English as second language learners. Boys showed a slower story comprehension growth trajectory than girls. The Better Start Literacy Approach story retell task shows promise in providing valid data to support teacher judgement of children's oral language development.","PeriodicalId":46549,"journal":{"name":"Child Language Teaching & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Language Teaching & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02656590231155861","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This study examined the validity of data collected from a novel online story retell task. The task was specifically designed for use by junior school teachers with the support of speech–language therapists or literacy specialists. The assessment task was developed to monitor children's oral language progress in their first year at school as part of the Better Start Literacy Approach for early literacy teaching. Teachers administered the task to 303 5-year-olds in New Zealand at school entry and after 20 weeks and 12 months of schooling. The children listened to a story with pictures via iPad presentation and were then prompted to retell the story. The children's spontaneous language used in their story retell was captured and uploaded digitally via iPad audio recording and analyzed using semi-automated speech recognition and computer software. Their responses to factual and inferential story comprehension questions were also analyzed. The data suggested that the task has good criterion validity. Significant correlations between story retell measures and a standardized measure of children's oral language were found. The Better Start Literacy Approach story retell task, which took approximately 6 min for teachers to administer, accurately identified children with low oral language ability 81% of the time. Growth curve analysis revealed that the task was useful for monitoring oral language development, including for English as second language learners. Boys showed a slower story comprehension growth trajectory than girls. The Better Start Literacy Approach story retell task shows promise in providing valid data to support teacher judgement of children's oral language development.
复述故事:网络口头叙述任务的有效性
本研究检验了从一个新颖的网络故事复述任务中收集的数据的有效性。这项任务是专门为初中教师设计的,在语言治疗师或读写专家的支持下使用。这项评估任务是为了监测儿童在学校第一年的口语进步,作为早期识字教学的“更好地开始识字”方法的一部分。新西兰的老师们对303名5岁的孩子进行了这项测试,这些孩子分别是刚入学时、20周和12个月后。孩子们通过iPad演示听了一个有图片的故事,然后被提示复述故事。孩子们在复述故事时使用的自发语言被捕捉下来,并通过iPad录音以数字方式上传,并使用半自动语音识别和计算机软件进行分析。他们对事实性和推理性故事理解问题的回答也进行了分析。数据表明该任务具有良好的效度。故事复述测量和儿童口语的标准化测量之间存在显著的相关性。“更好的开始扫盲方法”的故事复述任务,教师花了大约6分钟的时间来执行,在81%的时间里准确地识别出口语能力低的儿童。增长曲线分析显示,这项任务对监测口语发展很有用,包括作为第二语言学习者的英语。男孩的故事理解能力增长轨迹比女孩慢。Better Start Literacy Approach的故事复述任务有望提供有效的数据来支持教师对儿童口语发展的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Child Language Teaching and Therapy is an international peer reviewed journal which aims to be the leading inter-disciplinary journal in the field of children"s spoken and written language needs. The journal publishes original research and review articles of high practical relevance and which emphasise inter-disciplinary collaboration. Child Language Teaching and Therapy publishes regular special issues on specific subject areas and commissions keynote reviews of significant topics. The readership of the journal consists of academics and practitioners across the disciplines of education, speech and language therapy, psychology and linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信