Eurasian beavers in Central Italy: perceptions in the local community

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Andrea Viviano, Roger E. Auster, Giuseppe Mazza, Alessandro Lagrotteria, Chiara Pucci, Davide Senserini, Roisin Campbell-Palmer, Robert Needham, Davide Curci, Emiliano Mori
{"title":"Eurasian beavers in Central Italy: perceptions in the local community","authors":"Andrea Viviano,&nbsp;Roger E. Auster,&nbsp;Giuseppe Mazza,&nbsp;Alessandro Lagrotteria,&nbsp;Chiara Pucci,&nbsp;Davide Senserini,&nbsp;Roisin Campbell-Palmer,&nbsp;Robert Needham,&nbsp;Davide Curci,&nbsp;Emiliano Mori","doi":"10.1007/s00114-023-01860-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>According to the IUCN guidelines, wildlife reintroduction should consider any impacts on humans within feasibility assessments. Eurasian beavers <i>Castor fiber</i> are recovering across their native range, due to protection laws and reintroductions. In Central Italy, a self-sustaining, naturalised population of Eurasian beavers has been identified in the last five years. A questionnaire to measure whether and how citizens in the local area perceive the presence of the beaver was administered to 1114 respondents. We observed a comprehensive awareness of the presence of the beaver in Italy and a high ability to distinguish it from non-native coypus <i>Myocastor coypus</i> (92.3%). We also recorded a general high knowledge of issues related to the presence of the beaver (i.e., potential effects on indigenous biodiversity). The majority (65.5%) of the surveyed population was in favour of reintroducing the beaver in Central Italy, and only 1.2% was firmly against it. The majority of interviewed people was against the removal of beavers from Central Italy (65.8%), whereas only 3.7% was in favor, citing fears of perceived impacts on the river, crops, and fish populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":794,"journal":{"name":"The Science of Nature","volume":"110 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00114-023-01860-x.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Science of Nature","FirstCategoryId":"6","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00114-023-01860-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

According to the IUCN guidelines, wildlife reintroduction should consider any impacts on humans within feasibility assessments. Eurasian beavers Castor fiber are recovering across their native range, due to protection laws and reintroductions. In Central Italy, a self-sustaining, naturalised population of Eurasian beavers has been identified in the last five years. A questionnaire to measure whether and how citizens in the local area perceive the presence of the beaver was administered to 1114 respondents. We observed a comprehensive awareness of the presence of the beaver in Italy and a high ability to distinguish it from non-native coypus Myocastor coypus (92.3%). We also recorded a general high knowledge of issues related to the presence of the beaver (i.e., potential effects on indigenous biodiversity). The majority (65.5%) of the surveyed population was in favour of reintroducing the beaver in Central Italy, and only 1.2% was firmly against it. The majority of interviewed people was against the removal of beavers from Central Italy (65.8%), whereas only 3.7% was in favor, citing fears of perceived impacts on the river, crops, and fish populations.

Abstract Image

意大利中部的欧亚海狸:当地社区的看法
根据世界自然保护联盟的指导方针,野生动物的重新引入应该在可行性评估中考虑对人类的影响。由于保护法律和重新引入,欧亚海狸蓖麻纤维在其原生范围内正在恢复。在意大利中部,在过去的五年中发现了一个自我维持的、归化的欧亚海狸种群。对1114名受访者进行了一份问卷调查,以衡量当地居民是否以及如何感知海狸的存在。我们观察到意大利人对海狸的存在有全面的认识,并有很高的能力将其与非本地的coypus(92.3%)区分开来。我们还记录了与海狸存在相关的问题(即对土著生物多样性的潜在影响)的普遍知识。大多数被调查者(65.5%)赞成在意大利中部重新引入海狸,只有1.2%的人坚决反对。大多数受访者反对从意大利中部移除海狸(65.8%),而只有3.7%的人赞成,理由是担心对河流、农作物和鱼类种群的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Science of Nature
The Science of Nature 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Science of Nature - Naturwissenschaften - is Springer''s flagship multidisciplinary science journal. The journal is dedicated to the fast publication and global dissemination of high-quality research and invites papers, which are of interest to the broader community in the biological sciences. Contributions from the chemical, geological, and physical sciences are welcome if contributing to questions of general biological significance. Particularly welcomed are contributions that bridge between traditionally isolated areas and attempt to increase the conceptual understanding of systems and processes that demand an interdisciplinary approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信