Patient perspectives of pain and function after knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
C. E. Taylor, C. Murray, T. Stanton
{"title":"Patient perspectives of pain and function after knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies","authors":"C. E. Taylor, C. Murray, T. Stanton","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Patient perspectives highlight the need for presurgical information about expected recovery trajectories after total knee replacement and enhanced postsurgical follow-up with practical support. Abstract Introduction: Joint replacement surgery typically results in good clinical outcome, although some people experience suboptimal pain relief and functional improvement. Predicting surgical outcome is difficult. Objectives: There is merit in better understanding patients' perspectives of pain and function to identify avoidable problems perceived to contribute to their outcome, to inform prognostic expectations, and to identify potential cointerventions to sit alongside surgery that might mitigate pain/functional problems. Here, we aimed to synthesise the available literature exploring perspectives of people with knee osteoarthritis about their pain and function following joint replacement. Methods: Six electronic databases and 2 websites were searched. Two independent reviewers completed study inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction. Data were iteratively synthesised using first-, second-, and third-order analyses. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. Four themes were identified; perceptions of pain and function were inseparable. Theme 1 addressed experiences of recovery after surgery, which often differed from expectations. Theme 2 described the challenges of the pain experience and its functional impact, including the difficulty navigating medication use in context of personal beliefs and perceived stigma. Theme 3 articulated the toll of ongoing problems spanning pain–function–mood, necessitating the need to “endure.” Theme 4 encompassed the importance of clinical/social interactions on mood and pain, with reports of concerns dismissed and practical support missing. Conclusions: Together, these findings show that numerous individual considerations beyond the technical aspects of surgery influence experiences of pain and function. A tailored approach addressing these considerations from the patient perspective could provide a basis for improved success of knee replacement surgery.","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Patient perspectives highlight the need for presurgical information about expected recovery trajectories after total knee replacement and enhanced postsurgical follow-up with practical support. Abstract Introduction: Joint replacement surgery typically results in good clinical outcome, although some people experience suboptimal pain relief and functional improvement. Predicting surgical outcome is difficult. Objectives: There is merit in better understanding patients' perspectives of pain and function to identify avoidable problems perceived to contribute to their outcome, to inform prognostic expectations, and to identify potential cointerventions to sit alongside surgery that might mitigate pain/functional problems. Here, we aimed to synthesise the available literature exploring perspectives of people with knee osteoarthritis about their pain and function following joint replacement. Methods: Six electronic databases and 2 websites were searched. Two independent reviewers completed study inclusion, quality assessment, and data extraction. Data were iteratively synthesised using first-, second-, and third-order analyses. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. Four themes were identified; perceptions of pain and function were inseparable. Theme 1 addressed experiences of recovery after surgery, which often differed from expectations. Theme 2 described the challenges of the pain experience and its functional impact, including the difficulty navigating medication use in context of personal beliefs and perceived stigma. Theme 3 articulated the toll of ongoing problems spanning pain–function–mood, necessitating the need to “endure.” Theme 4 encompassed the importance of clinical/social interactions on mood and pain, with reports of concerns dismissed and practical support missing. Conclusions: Together, these findings show that numerous individual considerations beyond the technical aspects of surgery influence experiences of pain and function. A tailored approach addressing these considerations from the patient perspective could provide a basis for improved success of knee replacement surgery.
患者对膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能的看法:一项定性研究的系统回顾和综合
文本中提供了补充数字内容。患者观点强调需要术前信息,了解全膝关节置换术后的预期恢复轨迹,并在实际支持下加强术后随访。摘要简介:关节置换手术通常会带来良好的临床结果,尽管有些人的疼痛缓解和功能改善并不理想。预测手术结果很困难。目的:更好地理解患者对疼痛和功能的看法,以确定可避免的问题,为其预后预期提供信息,并确定可能缓解疼痛/功能问题的潜在协同干预措施,是有好处的。在这里,我们旨在综合现有文献,探索膝骨关节炎患者对关节置换术后疼痛和功能的看法。方法:检索6个电子数据库和2个网站。两名独立评审员完成了研究纳入、质量评估和数据提取。使用一阶、二阶和三阶分析迭代合成数据。结果:纳入28项研究。确定了四个主题;对疼痛和功能的感知是不可分割的。主题1介绍了手术后的康复经历,这些经历往往与预期不同。主题2描述了疼痛体验的挑战及其功能影响,包括在个人信仰和感知耻辱的背景下难以驾驭药物使用。主题3阐述了持续存在的疼痛-功能-情绪问题的代价,需要“忍受”。主题4涵盖了临床/社会互动对情绪和疼痛的重要性,有关担忧的报告被驳回,缺乏实际支持。结论:总之,这些发现表明,手术技术方面之外的许多个人考虑因素会影响疼痛和功能体验。从患者的角度解决这些问题的量身定制的方法可以为提高膝关节置换手术的成功率提供基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信