{"title":"Izbeglice (Refugees), azilanti (Asylum Seekers) and ilegalni migranti (Illegal Migrants) in Administrative and Public Discourse in Serbia","authors":"Marta Stojic Mitrovic","doi":"10.15176/vol57no208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present discourse concerning asylum and irregular migration, with all its concepts and institutions, techniques and code of conduct, was introduced in the Republic of Serbia through the EU Accession process. As a prerequisite for visa liberalization with the EU (achieved in 2009), Serbia signed readmission agreements with the EU and its member-states and adopted the Asylum Law (Zakon o azilu 2007) and the Law on Foreigners (Zakon o strancima 2008). However, related notions and legal instruments existed in the periods that preceded it. In this text I offer a diachronic overview of conceptual and procedural differences and discuss their entanglements, merging, spilling over and confrontation. In such a way, my aim is to point out their use as political statements in particular, as performatives affecting national and international political contexts.","PeriodicalId":38816,"journal":{"name":"Narodna Umjetnost","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Narodna Umjetnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15176/vol57no208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The present discourse concerning asylum and irregular migration, with all its concepts and institutions, techniques and code of conduct, was introduced in the Republic of Serbia through the EU Accession process. As a prerequisite for visa liberalization with the EU (achieved in 2009), Serbia signed readmission agreements with the EU and its member-states and adopted the Asylum Law (Zakon o azilu 2007) and the Law on Foreigners (Zakon o strancima 2008). However, related notions and legal instruments existed in the periods that preceded it. In this text I offer a diachronic overview of conceptual and procedural differences and discuss their entanglements, merging, spilling over and confrontation. In such a way, my aim is to point out their use as political statements in particular, as performatives affecting national and international political contexts.
目前关于庇护和非正常移徙的论述及其所有概念和体制、技术和行为守则都是塞尔维亚共和国通过加入欧盟的进程引进的。作为与欧盟实现签证自由化的先决条件(2009年实现),塞尔维亚与欧盟及其成员国签署了重新接纳协议,并通过了《庇护法》(Zakon o azilu 2007)和《外国人法》(Zakon o strancima 2008)。但是,在此之前的时期就存在有关的概念和法律文书。在本文中,我提供了概念和程序差异的历时性概述,并讨论了它们的纠缠,合并,溢出和对抗。通过这种方式,我的目的是指出它们作为政治声明的用途,特别是作为影响国家和国际政治背景的行为体。