{"title":"DELOVANJE TERORISTIČKIH ORGANIZACIJA OSAMDESETIH GODINA 20. VEKA U JUGOSLAVIJI – SA POSEBNIM OSVRTOM NA „KARLOSOVU“ ORGANIZACIJU","authors":"Radojica Lazić, Mirko Kulić","doi":"10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.laz.513-528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The foreign policy orientation of the Former Social Federative Republic of Yugoslavia relied mostly on “third world” countries or the so-called Non-Aligned Movement. In line with the politically proclaimed principles, the cooperation was based on “active peaceful coexistence”, equality, independence, and staying out of inner problems of other countries, as well as mutual respect and solidarity. To strengthen and improve the safety interests and the leadership position within the Non-Aligned Movement, Yugoslavia wholeheartedly supported a variety of liberation movements. As a transit country with an extremely liberal visa regime, it was exposed to potential dangers to be a hideout for certain criminal, terrorist, and other groups. This was more than enough of a reason for trying to establish a “background base” of the “Carlos” terrorist organization in Belgrade. The security issue in the country was more complicated by the fact that in that period, there were around 12,500 different people from various Arab countries (not counting over 2,000 officers and non-commissioned officers trained in military schools) who were mostly students. Those persons belonged to numerous groups and organizations, all with their own conceptual, political and religious beliefs. They acted under different international influences. The security organizations and services had an obligation to carefully track their behavior and take certain measurements against individuals, groups, and organizations, to prevent their secret and illicit activities aimed against the interests of the state. In this sense, it is perfectly understandable that when the activities of the “Carlos” terrorist group were discovered, the problem had to be solved in order not to harm the international position and the credibility of Yugoslavia. The most powerful countries in the West (primarily the USA) have openly resented the benevolent attitude of the Yugoslavia authorities towards members of certain groups and organizations that have used terrorist methods in their acts. One of those cases was Abu el Abas, the senior executive of a fraction of the Palestine Liberation Organization. After unexplained circumstances after a hostage crisis in the Middle East, el Abas found himself in Belgrade.","PeriodicalId":14520,"journal":{"name":"Istorija 20. veka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istorija 20. veka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2022.2.laz.513-528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The foreign policy orientation of the Former Social Federative Republic of Yugoslavia relied mostly on “third world” countries or the so-called Non-Aligned Movement. In line with the politically proclaimed principles, the cooperation was based on “active peaceful coexistence”, equality, independence, and staying out of inner problems of other countries, as well as mutual respect and solidarity. To strengthen and improve the safety interests and the leadership position within the Non-Aligned Movement, Yugoslavia wholeheartedly supported a variety of liberation movements. As a transit country with an extremely liberal visa regime, it was exposed to potential dangers to be a hideout for certain criminal, terrorist, and other groups. This was more than enough of a reason for trying to establish a “background base” of the “Carlos” terrorist organization in Belgrade. The security issue in the country was more complicated by the fact that in that period, there were around 12,500 different people from various Arab countries (not counting over 2,000 officers and non-commissioned officers trained in military schools) who were mostly students. Those persons belonged to numerous groups and organizations, all with their own conceptual, political and religious beliefs. They acted under different international influences. The security organizations and services had an obligation to carefully track their behavior and take certain measurements against individuals, groups, and organizations, to prevent their secret and illicit activities aimed against the interests of the state. In this sense, it is perfectly understandable that when the activities of the “Carlos” terrorist group were discovered, the problem had to be solved in order not to harm the international position and the credibility of Yugoslavia. The most powerful countries in the West (primarily the USA) have openly resented the benevolent attitude of the Yugoslavia authorities towards members of certain groups and organizations that have used terrorist methods in their acts. One of those cases was Abu el Abas, the senior executive of a fraction of the Palestine Liberation Organization. After unexplained circumstances after a hostage crisis in the Middle East, el Abas found himself in Belgrade.
前南斯拉夫社会联邦共和国的外交政策取向主要依靠“第三世界”国家或所谓的不结盟运动。根据政治上宣布的原则,合作的基础是“积极和平共处”,平等,独立,不干涉别国内部问题,以及相互尊重和团结。为了加强和改善安全利益和在不结盟运动中的领导地位,南斯拉夫全心全意地支持各种解放运动。作为一个签证制度极其宽松的过境国,它面临着成为某些犯罪分子、恐怖分子和其他组织藏身处的潜在危险。这是试图在贝尔格莱德建立“卡洛斯”恐怖主义组织“背景基地”的充分理由。该国的安全问题更为复杂,因为在那个时期,来自各个阿拉伯国家的大约12,500名不同的人(不包括在军事学校受过训练的2,000多名军官和士官),其中大多数是学生。这些人属于许多团体和组织,他们都有自己的观念、政治和宗教信仰。他们在不同的国际影响下行动。安全组织和部门有义务仔细跟踪他们的行为,并对个人、团体和组织采取一定的措施,防止他们从事危害国家利益的秘密和非法活动。从这个意义上讲,完全可以理解的是,当“卡洛斯”恐怖主义集团的活动被发现时,必须解决这个问题,以免损害南斯拉夫的国际地位和信誉。西方最强大的国家(主要是美国)对南斯拉夫当局对某些团体和组织成员采取的仁慈态度公开表示不满,这些团体和组织在行动中使用恐怖主义方法。阿巴斯(Abu el abbas)就是其中之一,他是巴勒斯坦解放组织(Palestine Liberation Organization)一个分支机构的高级主管。在中东人质危机之后的不明情况下,阿巴斯来到了贝尔格莱德。