Glossing an argument: Reformulation and exemplification in L2 Master’s theses

IF 0.2 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Tereza Guziurová
{"title":"Glossing an argument: Reformulation and exemplification in L2 Master’s theses","authors":"Tereza Guziurová","doi":"10.2478/topling-2022-0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following a large body of research on metadiscourse in academic writing, this paper explores one feature of textual metadiscourse, code glosses, in English L2 academic texts written by Czech university students. The study draws on Hyland’s metadiscourse model (2005), which characterizes code glosses as devices that elaborate propositional meanings by rephrasing or explaining what has been said. Thus, they can help readers understand the writer’s intended meaning or contribute to the formation of persuasive arguments. The corpus consists of 48 English L2 Master’s theses representing three disciplines – linguistics, literature and English language teaching (ELT) methodology, totalling almost 950,000 words. The results are compared with professional writing represented by English L1 research articles from the same disciplines. The findings reveal differences in the frequency and functions of several code glosses, as novice writers are shown to overuse certain devices. The findings also indicate cross-disciplinary variation, as reformulation and exemplification proved to be much more prominent in linguistics and methodology than in literary studies.","PeriodicalId":41377,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Linguistics","volume":"23 1","pages":"18 - 35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2022-0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Following a large body of research on metadiscourse in academic writing, this paper explores one feature of textual metadiscourse, code glosses, in English L2 academic texts written by Czech university students. The study draws on Hyland’s metadiscourse model (2005), which characterizes code glosses as devices that elaborate propositional meanings by rephrasing or explaining what has been said. Thus, they can help readers understand the writer’s intended meaning or contribute to the formation of persuasive arguments. The corpus consists of 48 English L2 Master’s theses representing three disciplines – linguistics, literature and English language teaching (ELT) methodology, totalling almost 950,000 words. The results are compared with professional writing represented by English L1 research articles from the same disciplines. The findings reveal differences in the frequency and functions of several code glosses, as novice writers are shown to overuse certain devices. The findings also indicate cross-disciplinary variation, as reformulation and exemplification proved to be much more prominent in linguistics and methodology than in literary studies.
阐释论点:第二语言硕士论文的重新表述与例证
在对学术写作中的元话语进行了大量研究之后,本文探讨了捷克大学生英语第二语言学术语篇中的元话语特征——语码注释。该研究借鉴了Hyland的元话语模型(2005),该模型将代码注释描述为通过重新措辞或解释所说内容来阐述命题意义的手段。因此,它们可以帮助读者理解作者的意图或有助于形成有说服力的论点。该语料库包括48篇英语第二语言硕士论文,代表语言学、文学和英语教学(ELT)方法论三个学科,总计近95万字。并将结果与以同一学科的英语母语研究文章为代表的专业写作进行了比较。研究结果揭示了几种代码修饰的频率和功能的差异,因为新手作者被证明过度使用某些设备。研究结果还表明了跨学科的差异,因为重新表述和例证在语言学和方法论中比在文学研究中更为突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Linguistics
Topics in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信