Output variation of trigger-pump sprayers used for individual plant treatments

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q3 PLANT SCIENCES
S. Enloe, J. Leary, Kenzie Bell, D. Lauer
{"title":"Output variation of trigger-pump sprayers used for individual plant treatments","authors":"S. Enloe, J. Leary, Kenzie Bell, D. Lauer","doi":"10.1017/inp.2021.32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Individual plant treatment (IPT) techniques (e.g., basal bark, cut stump, hack and squirt) are used for woody invasive plant management and often rely on small trigger-pump spray bottles as an economical and efficient way to deliver a herbicide to the target species. Worldwide, plastic suppliers produce many models and designs with a wide range of uses, including pesticide application. However, spray bottle performance has rarely been examined in relation to IPT techniques for operational invasive plant management. We tested 10 commonly available spray bottles for trigger output and variation over repeated strokes. We also examined sustained trigger sprayer performance over a 6-wk period for spray bottles containing water or basal oil carriers blended with amine and ester formulations of triclopyr, respectively. In the first study, we found significant differences in spray output per stroke between almost every bottle tested. Almost all spray bottle brands yielded outputs greater than 1.0 ml per stroke, which exceeds the maximum application amount specified for hack and squirt. Several bottles produced an output of greater than 2.5 ml per stroke. In the second study, the output per stroke was reduced for basal oil mixes, with significant reductions measured for two brands by 21 d and for all three brands tested by 42 d after mixing. These results indicate that consumer-grade trigger sprayers are likely to depreciate rapidly with routine operational use without proper hygiene maintenance. Even then it is likely that these application devices may need to be replaced several times annually. Trigger-pump spray bottles are an economical and practical solution for remote field operations and volunteer weed control activities. These sprayers are most suitable for spray-to-wet techniques such as basal bark and cut-surface treatments but may potentially be less suited for hack and squirt application, which often requires sub-milliliter precision.","PeriodicalId":14470,"journal":{"name":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","volume":"14 1","pages":"278 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invasive Plant Science and Management","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/inp.2021.32","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Individual plant treatment (IPT) techniques (e.g., basal bark, cut stump, hack and squirt) are used for woody invasive plant management and often rely on small trigger-pump spray bottles as an economical and efficient way to deliver a herbicide to the target species. Worldwide, plastic suppliers produce many models and designs with a wide range of uses, including pesticide application. However, spray bottle performance has rarely been examined in relation to IPT techniques for operational invasive plant management. We tested 10 commonly available spray bottles for trigger output and variation over repeated strokes. We also examined sustained trigger sprayer performance over a 6-wk period for spray bottles containing water or basal oil carriers blended with amine and ester formulations of triclopyr, respectively. In the first study, we found significant differences in spray output per stroke between almost every bottle tested. Almost all spray bottle brands yielded outputs greater than 1.0 ml per stroke, which exceeds the maximum application amount specified for hack and squirt. Several bottles produced an output of greater than 2.5 ml per stroke. In the second study, the output per stroke was reduced for basal oil mixes, with significant reductions measured for two brands by 21 d and for all three brands tested by 42 d after mixing. These results indicate that consumer-grade trigger sprayers are likely to depreciate rapidly with routine operational use without proper hygiene maintenance. Even then it is likely that these application devices may need to be replaced several times annually. Trigger-pump spray bottles are an economical and practical solution for remote field operations and volunteer weed control activities. These sprayers are most suitable for spray-to-wet techniques such as basal bark and cut-surface treatments but may potentially be less suited for hack and squirt application, which often requires sub-milliliter precision.
用于个体植物处理的触发泵喷雾器的输出变化
摘要个体植物处理(IPT)技术(例如,基部树皮、切割树桩、砍伤和喷射)用于木本入侵植物的管理,并且通常依靠小型触发泵喷雾瓶作为将除草剂输送到目标物种的经济有效的方式。在全球范围内,塑料供应商生产许多型号和设计,用途广泛,包括杀虫剂应用。然而,很少对喷雾瓶性能进行与IPT技术相关的检查,以用于操作入侵工厂管理。我们测试了10个常用的喷雾瓶的触发输出和重复冲程的变化。我们还检查了含有水或基础油载体的喷雾瓶在6周内的持续触发喷雾器性能,这些载体分别与三氯吡的胺和酯制剂混合。在第一项研究中,我们发现几乎每一个测试的瓶子每次冲程的喷雾量都存在显著差异。几乎所有品牌的喷雾瓶每冲程的输出量都超过1.0毫升,超过了规定的最大喷雾量。几个瓶子每冲程的输出量超过2.5毫升。在第二项研究中,基础油混合物的每冲程输出量减少,其中两个品牌在混合后21天显著减少,所有三个品牌在搅拌后42天显著减少。这些结果表明,在没有适当卫生维护的情况下,消费者级触发式喷雾器在日常操作使用中可能会迅速贬值。即便如此,这些应用设备也可能需要每年更换几次。触发泵喷雾瓶是一种经济实用的远程现场操作和志愿者杂草控制活动解决方案。这些喷雾器最适用于从喷雾到湿润的技术,如基础树皮和切割表面处理,但可能不太适用于通常需要亚毫升精度的黑客和喷射应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Invasive Plant Science and Management (IPSM) is an online peer-reviewed journal focusing on fundamental and applied research on invasive plant biology, ecology, management, and restoration of invaded non-crop areas, and on other aspects relevant to invasive species, including educational activities and policy issues. Topics include the biology and ecology of invasive plants in rangeland, prairie, pasture, wildland, forestry, riparian, wetland, aquatic, recreational, rights-of-ways, and other non-crop (parks, preserves, natural areas) settings; genetics of invasive plants; social, ecological, and economic impacts of invasive plants and their management; design, efficacy, and integration of control tools; land restoration and rehabilitation; effects of management on soil, air, water, and wildlife; education, extension, and outreach methods and resources; technology and product reports; mapping and remote sensing, inventory and monitoring; technology transfer tools; case study reports; and regulatory issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信