M&As by Business Groups and Market Competition: A Study of Tata Steel

Q2 Social Sciences
B. Saraswathy
{"title":"M&As by Business Groups and Market Competition: A Study of Tata Steel","authors":"B. Saraswathy","doi":"10.1177/0003603X21997027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the involvement of business groups in consolidation activity. An important component of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act was “the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few” which has been de-emphasized as per the amendment made in 1991. The new Competition Act mainly deals with the case-by-case analysis of market competition rather than ownership concentration. The competition regulation in its current form is mainly focusing on the concept of “economic efficiency” and not addressing the “social fairness” concept. The involvement of business groups in consolidation activities results in multiplier effects as they are already part of a diversified and well-structured umbrella of business with horizontal and vertical linkages. This article observes the active involvement of big business groups in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) activity across various product lines. Further, many such M&As are leading to capacity expansion not only in various overlapping products (i.e., horizontal linkages) but also in the vertical line of business, in which the affiliate firms of the group are engaged. This may be beneficial to the group as a whole since the cost of intermediary inputs supplied to various affiliate firms can be reduced. The study points to consider the “ownership and group effect” and the resulting synergy creation more carefully while assessing competition.","PeriodicalId":36832,"journal":{"name":"Antitrust Bulletin","volume":"66 1","pages":"236 - 251"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0003603X21997027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antitrust Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X21997027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the involvement of business groups in consolidation activity. An important component of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act was “the concentration of economic power in the hands of a few” which has been de-emphasized as per the amendment made in 1991. The new Competition Act mainly deals with the case-by-case analysis of market competition rather than ownership concentration. The competition regulation in its current form is mainly focusing on the concept of “economic efficiency” and not addressing the “social fairness” concept. The involvement of business groups in consolidation activities results in multiplier effects as they are already part of a diversified and well-structured umbrella of business with horizontal and vertical linkages. This article observes the active involvement of big business groups in mergers and acquisitions (M&As) activity across various product lines. Further, many such M&As are leading to capacity expansion not only in various overlapping products (i.e., horizontal linkages) but also in the vertical line of business, in which the affiliate firms of the group are engaged. This may be beneficial to the group as a whole since the cost of intermediary inputs supplied to various affiliate firms can be reduced. The study points to consider the “ownership and group effect” and the resulting synergy creation more carefully while assessing competition.
企业集团并购与市场竞争——对塔塔钢铁的研究
本文考察了企业集团在合并活动中的参与情况。《垄断和限制性贸易惯例法》的一个重要组成部分是“经济权力集中在少数人手中”,根据1991年的修正案,这一点已不再强调。新的《竞争法》主要处理市场竞争的个案分析,而不是所有权集中。当前形式的竞争规制主要关注“经济效率”的概念,没有解决“社会公平”的概念。企业集团参与合并活动会产生乘数效应,因为它们已经是具有横向和纵向联系的多元化和结构良好的业务保护伞的一部分。本文观察了大型企业集团在各种产品线的并购活动中的积极参与。此外,许多这样的并购不仅导致了各种重叠产品(即水平联系)的产能扩张,而且还导致了集团附属公司参与的垂直业务线的产能扩张。这可能对整个集团有利,因为提供给各附属公司的中间投入的成本可以降低。研究指出,在评估竞争时,应更仔细地考虑“所有权和集团效应”及其产生的协同效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antitrust Bulletin
Antitrust Bulletin Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信