Cognitive Impairment and Associated Factors among Older Adults with Diabetes in a Suburban Primary Health Center in Thailand

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Chuthiphun Panyawattanakit, Wadee Wongpradit, Ruankwan Kanhasing, P. Kulalert
{"title":"Cognitive Impairment and Associated Factors among Older Adults with Diabetes in a Suburban Primary Health Center in Thailand","authors":"Chuthiphun Panyawattanakit, Wadee Wongpradit, Ruankwan Kanhasing, P. Kulalert","doi":"10.1159/000524132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Thailand is a rapidly aging society. The percentage of older adults with diabetes has also been increasing. Since diabetes mellitus is documented as a risk factor for dementia, it is important to address cognitive impairment in older adults with diabetes. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of cognitive impairment among older adults with diabetes in a suburban primary health center in Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional study in 244 diabetic patients aged 60 years or older was conducted in a primary health care unit in Pathum Thani, Thailand. Cognitive function was assessed with the validated Thai version of the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Test. Sociodemographic and health characteristic data were obtained. Results: The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 54.5% (133 out of 244). Multivariate logistic regression disclosed that factors significantly associated with cognitive impairment were ages 70–79 years compared to ages 60–69 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–3.62, p value 0.048), ages ≥80 years compared to ages 60–69 years (OR 3.65, 95% CI: 1.19–11.24, p value 0.024), education ≤ primary school (OR 7.28, 95% CI: 3.56–14.89, p value <0.001), and medication managed by caregiver compared to self-management of medication (OR 13.40, 95% CI: 1.55–116.10, p value 0.019). Conclusion: We revealed that approximately half of older adults with diabetes had cognitive impairment. This finding strongly suggests the need to include cognitive assessment in a standard clinical practice guideline for diabetic patients and to focus more on individuals who are very old, have low education, or are unable to manage their drugs by themselves.","PeriodicalId":11126,"journal":{"name":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000524132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction: Thailand is a rapidly aging society. The percentage of older adults with diabetes has also been increasing. Since diabetes mellitus is documented as a risk factor for dementia, it is important to address cognitive impairment in older adults with diabetes. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and associated factors of cognitive impairment among older adults with diabetes in a suburban primary health center in Thailand. Methods: A cross-sectional study in 244 diabetic patients aged 60 years or older was conducted in a primary health care unit in Pathum Thani, Thailand. Cognitive function was assessed with the validated Thai version of the Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Test. Sociodemographic and health characteristic data were obtained. Results: The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 54.5% (133 out of 244). Multivariate logistic regression disclosed that factors significantly associated with cognitive impairment were ages 70–79 years compared to ages 60–69 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–3.62, p value 0.048), ages ≥80 years compared to ages 60–69 years (OR 3.65, 95% CI: 1.19–11.24, p value 0.024), education ≤ primary school (OR 7.28, 95% CI: 3.56–14.89, p value <0.001), and medication managed by caregiver compared to self-management of medication (OR 13.40, 95% CI: 1.55–116.10, p value 0.019). Conclusion: We revealed that approximately half of older adults with diabetes had cognitive impairment. This finding strongly suggests the need to include cognitive assessment in a standard clinical practice guideline for diabetic patients and to focus more on individuals who are very old, have low education, or are unable to manage their drugs by themselves.
泰国郊区初级卫生中心老年糖尿病患者的认知障碍及其相关因素
泰国是一个快速老龄化的社会。老年糖尿病患者的比例也在增加。由于糖尿病被认为是痴呆的危险因素,因此解决老年糖尿病患者的认知障碍是很重要的。因此,本研究旨在评估泰国郊区初级卫生中心老年糖尿病患者认知功能障碍的患病率及其相关因素。方法:在泰国巴吞他尼的一个初级卫生保健单位对244名60岁或以上的糖尿病患者进行了横断面研究。认知功能评估采用泰国版迷你阿登布鲁克认知检查测试。获得了社会人口学和健康特征数据。结果:244例患者中有133例存在认知障碍,患病率为54.5%。多因素logistic回归显示,与认知障碍显著相关的因素为70-79岁与60-69岁(比值比[OR] 1.90, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.01-3.62, p值0.048),年龄≥80岁与60-69岁(比值比[OR]: 3.65, 95% CI: 1.19-11.24, p值0.024),教育程度≤小学(比值比7.28,95% CI: 3.56-14.89, p值<0.001),护理人员管理药物与自我管理药物(比值比13.40,95% CI: 0.048):1.55-116.10, p值0.019)。结论:我们发现大约一半的老年糖尿病患者有认知障碍。这一发现强烈表明,有必要将认知评估纳入糖尿病患者的标准临床实践指南,并更多地关注年龄较大、受教育程度较低或无法自行管理药物的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: As a unique forum devoted exclusively to the study of cognitive dysfunction, ''Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders'' concentrates on Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s chorea and other neurodegenerative diseases. The journal draws from diverse related research disciplines such as psychogeriatrics, neuropsychology, clinical neurology, morphology, physiology, genetic molecular biology, pathology, biochemistry, immunology, pharmacology and pharmaceutics. Strong emphasis is placed on the publication of research findings from animal studies which are complemented by clinical and therapeutic experience to give an overall appreciation of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信