Hawaiʻi residents' perceptions of Kīlauea's 2018 eruption information

IF 2.5 Q2 Earth and Planetary Sciences
Volcanica Pub Date : 2023-02-05 DOI:10.30909/vol.06.01.1943
Robert Goldman, Wendy K. Stovall, D. Damby, Sara K. Mcbride
{"title":"Hawaiʻi residents' perceptions of Kīlauea's 2018 eruption information","authors":"Robert Goldman, Wendy K. Stovall, D. Damby, Sara K. Mcbride","doi":"10.30909/vol.06.01.1943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2018 eruption of Kīlauea Volcano was notable for its variety of large and spatially distinct hazards, simultaneously affecting three geographically disparate, culturally diverse regions in Hawaiʻi. We conducted a pilot study, consisting of 18 semi-structured interviews, two survey responses, and several informal conversations with Hawaiʻi residents to learn which sources/messengers of eruption information were deemed most trusted and credible. Participants' perceptions of the U.S. Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO), community-based messengers, and traditional news media can be examined across four themes: relevance, expertise, sincerity, and pace. Among our interview participants, Lower East Rift Zone (LERZ) residents placed the highest trust in their community messengers, summit residents deemed HVO most trustworthy, and Kaʻū residents trusted information from both HVO and local news media. Our findings suggest that future official eruption communications would benefit from 1) designating communications personnel to act as community liaisons and 2) increasing pace and relevance of information delivery.","PeriodicalId":33053,"journal":{"name":"Volcanica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volcanica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30909/vol.06.01.1943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The 2018 eruption of Kīlauea Volcano was notable for its variety of large and spatially distinct hazards, simultaneously affecting three geographically disparate, culturally diverse regions in Hawaiʻi. We conducted a pilot study, consisting of 18 semi-structured interviews, two survey responses, and several informal conversations with Hawaiʻi residents to learn which sources/messengers of eruption information were deemed most trusted and credible. Participants' perceptions of the U.S. Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory (HVO), community-based messengers, and traditional news media can be examined across four themes: relevance, expertise, sincerity, and pace. Among our interview participants, Lower East Rift Zone (LERZ) residents placed the highest trust in their community messengers, summit residents deemed HVO most trustworthy, and Kaʻū residents trusted information from both HVO and local news media. Our findings suggest that future official eruption communications would benefit from 1) designating communications personnel to act as community liaisons and 2) increasing pace and relevance of information delivery.
夏威夷居民对2018年火山喷发信息的认知
2018年基劳厄火山爆发以其各种巨大且空间上不同的危险而闻名,同时影响了夏威夷三个地理上不同、文化上不同的地区。我们进行了一项试点研究,包括18次半结构化访谈、两次调查回复以及与夏威夷居民的几次非正式对话,以了解哪些喷发信息来源/信使被认为是最可信的。参与者对美国地质调查局夏威夷火山观测站(HVO)、社区信使和传统新闻媒体的看法可以从四个主题进行考察:相关性、专业知识、诚意和速度。在我们的采访参与者中,下东非大裂谷(LERZ)居民对他们的社区信使给予了最高的信任,峰会居民认为HVO最值得信赖,Kaïş居民信任HVO和当地新闻媒体的信息。我们的研究结果表明,未来的官方火山喷发沟通将受益于1)指定沟通人员担任社区联络人,以及2)提高信息传递的速度和相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Volcanica
Volcanica Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信