Exploring Predictors of Postsecondary Outcomes for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

IF 0.7 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Amy Nasamran, S. Witmer, J. Los
{"title":"Exploring Predictors of Postsecondary Outcomes for Students with Autism Spectrum Disorder.","authors":"Amy Nasamran, S. Witmer, J. Los","doi":"10.1037/e603852013-001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participating in postsecondary activities such as education and employment can increase an individual’s independence, contribution to society, and quality of life. However, researchers suggest that students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) engage in these postsecondary activities less than their peers do. The extent to which academic and social skills predict postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD is not yet understood. Logistic regression analyses using the National Longitudinal Transition Study – 2 (NLTS2; SRI, 2000) dataset were conducted to examine the extent to which academic skills and social skills predict postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD. Results suggested that academic achievement was significantly related to postsecondary education and overall success and that social skills significantly predicted all three postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD. The transition from adolescence to adulthood can be challenging for many students. Students with disabilities in particular experience lower rates of success when transitioning from high school to postsecondary roles in comparison to their typically developing peers (Blackorby & Wagner, 1996). Specifically, students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) encounter a variety of challenges. ASD is a developmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction and communication skills and a repetitive or restricted pattern of behavior (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These challenges can make the transition to postsecondary experiences especially difficult for students with ASD. In a comprehensive review of existing literature on the transition from high school to postsecondary environments among students with ASD, Wehman et al. (2014) point to the tremendous potential for individuals with ASD to make important contributions to society if various barriers to their postsecondary success can be overcome. Currently, students with ASD participate in postsecondary educational programs, employment opportunities, and independent living at very low rates (Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2005; Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). Anderson, Shattuck, Cooper, Roux, and Wagner (2014) found that individuals with ASD were much less likely than students of other disability groups to live independently following high school, even when controlling for functional ability. Given these findings, it is important to more carefully explore factors that can potentially affect these students’ transition and integration into the community. There is evidence to suggest that academic achievement in high school is an important factor that corresponds to later outcomes for the student population in general (Hein, Smerdon, & Sambolt, 2013). However, the relationship of academic achievement and postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD is not yet well understood. Additionally, this emphasis on academic achievement may lead to a reduced focus on social skill instruction, which may be especially important for students with ASD given that “persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts” are a defining feature of ASD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5 ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Although variability exists in the severity and manner in which social impairments manifest across the autism spectrum, students Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Amy Nasamran, c/o Sara E. Witmer, Michigan State University, 620 Farm Lane, Rm. 434, East Lansing, MI 48823. E-mail: saraliz77@gmail.com Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2017, 52(4), 343–356 © Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities Predictors of Outcomes for ASD / 343 with ASD by definition universally experience social difficulties, and social skills instruction has been shown to improve social functioning for students with ASD (White, Koenig, & Scahill, 2010). Given the social impairments experienced by students with ASD, social skills may be a particularly important and predictive factor that affects the postsecondary outcomes of students with ASD. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to explore both academic achievement and social skills as predictors of postsecondary success for students with ASD. Postsecondary Outcome Rates Transitioning to and completing a postsecondary education program or obtaining gainful employment can increase an individual’s independence, contribution to society, and quality of life (Hendricks, 2010; Stodden & Mzurek, 2010). However, little research has been conducted regarding these postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD. Some researchers have examined the postsecondary participation rates of individuals with ASD. In a study of 140 young adult and adult males with ASD, only about 14% were a) employed or enrolled in higher education or vocational training and b) living independently, and 27% reported participating in one or the other (Cederlund, Hagberg, Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2008). In another study of 48 young adult males and females with ASD, less than one-third of the participants participated in a postsecondary educational or training program, with only one attending a four-year university, and none having yet graduated with a certificate or degree (Eaves & Ho, 2008). Additionally, only about half of the participants had ever participated in employment opportunities, most of which were in volunteer or part-time settings, such as delivering papers or sorting recyclables (Eaves & Ho, 2008). Finally, more than half of the participants lived at home with their parents, with only four participants living independently. Taylor and Seltzer (2010) examined the postsecondary experiences of 66 students with ASD and examined more closely differences for those with and without comorbid intellectual disabilities (47 with comorbid intellectual disabilities [ID] and 17 without ID). Of the students with ASD and ID, 82% were involved in some sort of regular day activity (i.e., college, employment, adult day services), whereas only 76% of those with ASD and no ID were involved in these regular day activities. Although more students with ASD and no ID were attending a college or university compared to those with ID (i.e., 47% vs. 2%), the lack of structured postsecondary activity among many of the students with ASD and without ID suggests a potential need to look more carefully at those who are higher functioning. Researchers have also compared postsecondary experiences of individuals with ASD to those of the general population and students with other disabilities (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). These researchers found that less than one-third of 23to 26-year-olds with ASD were currently employed and worked for pay compared to an average of 59% for all respondents (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). Compared to other disability groups, those with ASD had the second lowest rate of postsecondary employment participation (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). Rates of postsecondary participation have also been examined in a nationally representative sample of students with ASD. In one study, postsecondary participation rates of students with ASD were compared to those of students of three other disability categories: speech/language impairment, learning disability, and intellectual disability (Shattuck et al., 2012). Postsecondary participation rates in this larger nationally representative sample were consistent with findings in the existing literature, with only about 35% of students with ASD attending a postsecondary educational institution and about 55% participating in paid employment within six years of graduating from high school. However, more than 50% of the ASD group had no participation in postsecondary educational or employment activities within two years of high school graduation. In comparison to the other disability groups, those with ASD had the lowest rate of participation in employment and the highest rate of no participation in postsecondary educational or employment activities (Shattuck et al., 2012). In other studies examining a nationally representative sample of students with ASD, findings indicated that 43% of students with ASD attended a postsecondary educational institution (Chiang, Cheung, 344 / Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities-December 2017 Hickson, Xiang, & Tsai, 2012) and 56% participated in paid employment (Chiang, Cheung, Li, & Tsai, 2013). Together, results from the existing literature consistently indicate that individuals with ASD have poorer postsecondary outcomes and are participating in important postsecondary activities, such as education, employment, and independent living, at lower rates compared to their peers. Based on data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (NLTS2), enrollment in postsecondary training among students with autism was estimated to be approximately 44% and was less than enrollment rates of six other disability groups, including those with learning disabilities, speech/language impairments, hearing impairments, visual impairments, orthopedic impairments, and those with other health impairments (Newman et al., 2011). The postsecondary completion rate for students with ASD was estimated to be 39% (Newman et al., 2011). In a survey of postsecondary institutions, only 56% reported enrolling students with an ASD; a higher proportion of institutions reported enrolling students of several other disability types, including those with hearing impairments, visual impairments, mobility concerns, learning disabilities, ADD/ADHD, health impairments, and mental illness (Raue & Lewis, 2011). Academic Achievement and Postsecondary Outcomes Pursuing postsecondary activities such as higher education and employment can be a selective process in which only those who meet certain qualifications are given the opportunity to participate (Hart, Grigal, & Weir, 20","PeriodicalId":47130,"journal":{"name":"Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities","volume":"52 1","pages":"343-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e603852013-001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Participating in postsecondary activities such as education and employment can increase an individual’s independence, contribution to society, and quality of life. However, researchers suggest that students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) engage in these postsecondary activities less than their peers do. The extent to which academic and social skills predict postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD is not yet understood. Logistic regression analyses using the National Longitudinal Transition Study – 2 (NLTS2; SRI, 2000) dataset were conducted to examine the extent to which academic skills and social skills predict postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD. Results suggested that academic achievement was significantly related to postsecondary education and overall success and that social skills significantly predicted all three postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD. The transition from adolescence to adulthood can be challenging for many students. Students with disabilities in particular experience lower rates of success when transitioning from high school to postsecondary roles in comparison to their typically developing peers (Blackorby & Wagner, 1996). Specifically, students with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) encounter a variety of challenges. ASD is a developmental disorder characterized by impaired social interaction and communication skills and a repetitive or restricted pattern of behavior (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). These challenges can make the transition to postsecondary experiences especially difficult for students with ASD. In a comprehensive review of existing literature on the transition from high school to postsecondary environments among students with ASD, Wehman et al. (2014) point to the tremendous potential for individuals with ASD to make important contributions to society if various barriers to their postsecondary success can be overcome. Currently, students with ASD participate in postsecondary educational programs, employment opportunities, and independent living at very low rates (Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2005; Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). Anderson, Shattuck, Cooper, Roux, and Wagner (2014) found that individuals with ASD were much less likely than students of other disability groups to live independently following high school, even when controlling for functional ability. Given these findings, it is important to more carefully explore factors that can potentially affect these students’ transition and integration into the community. There is evidence to suggest that academic achievement in high school is an important factor that corresponds to later outcomes for the student population in general (Hein, Smerdon, & Sambolt, 2013). However, the relationship of academic achievement and postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD is not yet well understood. Additionally, this emphasis on academic achievement may lead to a reduced focus on social skill instruction, which may be especially important for students with ASD given that “persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple contexts” are a defining feature of ASD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5 ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Although variability exists in the severity and manner in which social impairments manifest across the autism spectrum, students Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Amy Nasamran, c/o Sara E. Witmer, Michigan State University, 620 Farm Lane, Rm. 434, East Lansing, MI 48823. E-mail: saraliz77@gmail.com Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 2017, 52(4), 343–356 © Division on Autism and Developmental Disabilities Predictors of Outcomes for ASD / 343 with ASD by definition universally experience social difficulties, and social skills instruction has been shown to improve social functioning for students with ASD (White, Koenig, & Scahill, 2010). Given the social impairments experienced by students with ASD, social skills may be a particularly important and predictive factor that affects the postsecondary outcomes of students with ASD. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to explore both academic achievement and social skills as predictors of postsecondary success for students with ASD. Postsecondary Outcome Rates Transitioning to and completing a postsecondary education program or obtaining gainful employment can increase an individual’s independence, contribution to society, and quality of life (Hendricks, 2010; Stodden & Mzurek, 2010). However, little research has been conducted regarding these postsecondary outcomes for students with ASD. Some researchers have examined the postsecondary participation rates of individuals with ASD. In a study of 140 young adult and adult males with ASD, only about 14% were a) employed or enrolled in higher education or vocational training and b) living independently, and 27% reported participating in one or the other (Cederlund, Hagberg, Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2008). In another study of 48 young adult males and females with ASD, less than one-third of the participants participated in a postsecondary educational or training program, with only one attending a four-year university, and none having yet graduated with a certificate or degree (Eaves & Ho, 2008). Additionally, only about half of the participants had ever participated in employment opportunities, most of which were in volunteer or part-time settings, such as delivering papers or sorting recyclables (Eaves & Ho, 2008). Finally, more than half of the participants lived at home with their parents, with only four participants living independently. Taylor and Seltzer (2010) examined the postsecondary experiences of 66 students with ASD and examined more closely differences for those with and without comorbid intellectual disabilities (47 with comorbid intellectual disabilities [ID] and 17 without ID). Of the students with ASD and ID, 82% were involved in some sort of regular day activity (i.e., college, employment, adult day services), whereas only 76% of those with ASD and no ID were involved in these regular day activities. Although more students with ASD and no ID were attending a college or university compared to those with ID (i.e., 47% vs. 2%), the lack of structured postsecondary activity among many of the students with ASD and without ID suggests a potential need to look more carefully at those who are higher functioning. Researchers have also compared postsecondary experiences of individuals with ASD to those of the general population and students with other disabilities (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). These researchers found that less than one-third of 23to 26-year-olds with ASD were currently employed and worked for pay compared to an average of 59% for all respondents (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). Compared to other disability groups, those with ASD had the second lowest rate of postsecondary employment participation (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009). Rates of postsecondary participation have also been examined in a nationally representative sample of students with ASD. In one study, postsecondary participation rates of students with ASD were compared to those of students of three other disability categories: speech/language impairment, learning disability, and intellectual disability (Shattuck et al., 2012). Postsecondary participation rates in this larger nationally representative sample were consistent with findings in the existing literature, with only about 35% of students with ASD attending a postsecondary educational institution and about 55% participating in paid employment within six years of graduating from high school. However, more than 50% of the ASD group had no participation in postsecondary educational or employment activities within two years of high school graduation. In comparison to the other disability groups, those with ASD had the lowest rate of participation in employment and the highest rate of no participation in postsecondary educational or employment activities (Shattuck et al., 2012). In other studies examining a nationally representative sample of students with ASD, findings indicated that 43% of students with ASD attended a postsecondary educational institution (Chiang, Cheung, 344 / Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities-December 2017 Hickson, Xiang, & Tsai, 2012) and 56% participated in paid employment (Chiang, Cheung, Li, & Tsai, 2013). Together, results from the existing literature consistently indicate that individuals with ASD have poorer postsecondary outcomes and are participating in important postsecondary activities, such as education, employment, and independent living, at lower rates compared to their peers. Based on data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (NLTS2), enrollment in postsecondary training among students with autism was estimated to be approximately 44% and was less than enrollment rates of six other disability groups, including those with learning disabilities, speech/language impairments, hearing impairments, visual impairments, orthopedic impairments, and those with other health impairments (Newman et al., 2011). The postsecondary completion rate for students with ASD was estimated to be 39% (Newman et al., 2011). In a survey of postsecondary institutions, only 56% reported enrolling students with an ASD; a higher proportion of institutions reported enrolling students of several other disability types, including those with hearing impairments, visual impairments, mobility concerns, learning disabilities, ADD/ADHD, health impairments, and mental illness (Raue & Lewis, 2011). Academic Achievement and Postsecondary Outcomes Pursuing postsecondary activities such as higher education and employment can be a selective process in which only those who meet certain qualifications are given the opportunity to participate (Hart, Grigal, & Weir, 20
探究自闭症谱系障碍学生中学后结局的预测因素。
参加教育和就业等高等教育活动可以提高个人的独立性、对社会的贡献和生活质量。然而,研究人员认为,患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的学生比他们的同龄人更少参与这些高等教育活动。学术和社交技能在多大程度上预测了自闭症学生的高等教育成果,目前还不清楚。Logistic回归分析使用国家纵向过渡研究- 2 (NLTS2;SRI, 2000)数据集被用来检验学术技能和社交技能在多大程度上预测ASD学生的高等教育结果。结果表明,学业成绩与高等教育和整体成功显著相关,社交技能显著预测ASD学生的所有三个高等教育结果。对许多学生来说,从青春期到成年的过渡是具有挑战性的。与正常发展的同龄人相比,残疾学生在从高中过渡到高等教育角色时的成功率尤其低(Blackorby & Wagner, 1996)。具体来说,患有自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的学生遇到了各种各样的挑战。ASD是一种发育障碍,其特征是社交互动和沟通能力受损,行为模式重复或受限(美国精神病学协会,2013)。这些挑战会使自闭症学生向高等教育过渡尤其困难。Wehman等人(2014)对ASD学生从高中过渡到高等教育环境的现有文献进行了全面回顾,指出如果能够克服各种障碍,ASD患者将有巨大的潜力为社会做出重要贡献。目前,自闭症谱系障碍学生参加高等教育项目、就业机会和独立生活的比例非常低(Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2005;Hendricks & Wehman, 2009)。Anderson, shatuck, Cooper, Roux和Wagner(2014)发现,与其他残疾群体的学生相比,ASD患者在高中毕业后独立生活的可能性要小得多,即使在控制功能能力的情况下也是如此。鉴于这些发现,更仔细地探索可能影响这些学生过渡和融入社区的因素是很重要的。有证据表明,高中学业成绩是一个重要因素,与学生群体的后期成果相对应(Hein, Smerdon, & Sambolt, 2013)。然而,ASD学生的学业成绩和高等教育成绩之间的关系还没有得到很好的理解。此外,这种对学业成绩的强调可能会导致对社交技能教学的关注减少,这对于患有ASD的学生来说尤其重要,因为根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(5版),“在多种情况下,社会沟通和社会互动方面的持续缺陷”是ASD的一个决定性特征。dsm - 5,美国精神病学协会,2013)。尽管自闭症谱系中社会障碍的严重程度和表现方式存在差异,但有关这篇文章的学生来信应寄给艾米·纳萨姆兰,由萨拉·e·维特默(Sara E. Witmer)转达,密歇根州立大学,620 Farm Lane, Rm. 434,东兰辛,密歇根州48823。E-mail: saraliz77@gmail.com自闭症与发育障碍的教育与培训,2017,52(4),343 - 356©自闭症与发育障碍学部ASD预后预测因子/ 343根据定义,ASD患者普遍经历社交困难,社交技能指导已被证明可以改善ASD学生的社交功能(White, Koenig, & Scahill, 2010)。考虑到自闭症学生所经历的社交障碍,社交技能可能是影响自闭症学生中学后成绩的一个特别重要的预测因素。因此,本研究的目的是探讨学业成绩和社交技能作为自闭症学生中学后成功的预测因素。过渡到并完成高等教育课程或获得有报酬的工作可以提高个人的独立性,对社会的贡献和生活质量(Hendricks, 2010;Stodden & Mzurek, 2010)。然而,关于ASD学生的这些高等教育结果的研究很少。一些研究人员调查了自闭症患者的中学后参与率。 在一项针对140名患有自闭症的年轻成人和成年男性的研究中,只有大约14%的人a)有工作或正在接受高等教育或职业培训,b)独立生活,27%的人报告参加了其中一项(Cederlund, Hagberg, Billstedt, Gillberg, & Gillberg, 2008)。在另一项对48名患有自闭症的年轻成年男性和女性的研究中,不到三分之一的参与者参加了高等教育或培训计划,只有一人参加了四年制大学,而且没有人获得证书或学位(Eaves & Ho, 2008)。此外,只有大约一半的参与者曾经参加过就业机会,其中大多数是志愿者或兼职环境,例如送报纸或分类可回收物(Eaves & Ho, 2008)。最后,超过一半的参与者与父母住在一起,只有四名参与者独立生活。Taylor和Seltzer(2010)调查了66名患有ASD的学生的中学后经历,并更密切地研究了有和没有共病性智力残疾的学生(47名患有共病性智力残疾,17名没有共病性智力残疾)之间的差异。在有自闭症谱系障碍和自闭症谱系障碍的学生中,82%的人参加了某种常规的日常活动(即,上大学、就业、成人日常服务),而只有76%的有自闭症谱系障碍和没有自闭症谱系障碍的学生参加了这些常规的日常活动。尽管与有认知障碍的学生相比,有更多的ASD而没有认知障碍的学生进入了学院或大学(即47%对2%),但在许多有ASD而没有认知障碍的学生中,缺乏结构化的中学后活动,这表明可能需要更仔细地观察那些功能更高的学生。研究人员还将自闭症个体的中学后经历与一般人群和其他残疾学生的经历进行了比较(Hendricks & Wehman, 2009)。这些研究人员发现,在23至26岁的自闭症患者中,目前只有不到三分之一的人有工作,而在所有受访者中,这一比例平均为59% (Hendricks & Wehman, 2009)。与其他残疾群体相比,自闭症患者的高等教育就业参与率第二低(Hendricks & Wehman, 2009)。高等教育参与率也在全国代表性的自闭症学生样本中进行了检查。在一项研究中,将ASD学生的高等教育参与率与其他三种残疾类别的学生进行了比较:言语/语言障碍、学习障碍和智力残疾(shatuck et al., 2012)。在这个更大的全国代表性样本中,高等教育参与率与现有文献的研究结果一致,只有约35%的ASD学生在高中毕业后的六年内参加了高等教育机构,约55%的ASD学生参加了有偿就业。然而,超过50%的ASD组在高中毕业后的两年内没有参加高等教育或就业活动。与其他残疾群体相比,自闭症患者的就业参与率最低,不参加高等教育或就业活动的比例最高(shatuck et al., 2012)。在对全国代表性的自闭症学生样本进行的其他研究中,研究结果表明,43%的自闭症学生参加了高等教育机构(Chiang,张,344 /自闭症和发育障碍的教育和培训- 2017年12月Hickson, Xiang, & Tsai, 2012), 56%参加了带薪就业(Chiang,张,Li, & Tsai, 2013)。总之,现有文献的结果一致表明,与同龄人相比,ASD患者的高等教育结果较差,参与重要的高等教育活动(如教育、就业和独立生活)的比例较低。根据国家纵向过渡研究2 (NLTS2)的数据,自闭症学生参加中学后培训的入学率估计约为44%,低于其他六种残疾群体的入学率,包括学习障碍、言语/语言障碍、听力障碍、视觉障碍、矫形障碍和其他健康障碍(Newman et al., 2011)。ASD学生的高等教育完成率估计为39% (Newman et al., 2011)。在一项针对高等教育机构的调查中,只有56%的机构表示招收了自闭症患者;更高比例的院校报告招收了其他几种残疾类型的学生,包括听力障碍、视力障碍、行动障碍、学习障碍、注意力缺陷多动症、健康障碍和精神疾病(Raue & Lewis, 2011)。 追求高等教育和就业等高等教育活动可能是一个选择性的过程,只有那些符合某些资格的人才有机会参与(Hart, Grigal, & Weir, 20)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities focuses on the education and welfare of persons autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and developmental disabilities. ETADD invites research and expository manuscripts and critical review of the literature. Major emphasis is on identification and assessment, educational programming, characteristics, training of instructional personnel, rehabilitation, prevention, community understanding and provisions, and legislation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信