A city within itself: Altgeld Gardens and public housing’s utopia

Q2 Social Sciences
Madeleine Hamlin
{"title":"A city within itself: Altgeld Gardens and public housing’s utopia","authors":"Madeleine Hamlin","doi":"10.1386/jucs_00047_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Altgeld Gardens is one of Chicago’s last remaining family public housing developments after the city’s large-scale conversion of public housing into mixed-income communities. Located at the far southern edge of the city, the community today is an island of poverty, disconnected\n from city services, jobs, amenities and even grocery stores. In this article, I draw on architectural plans and historic housing authority documents to demonstrate that Altgeld’s current condition is a far cry from how planners envisioned the community: as nothing short of a utopian\n housing development capable of supporting workers and their families and indeed, inculcating an ideal, modern citizen that would justify public investment in housing for the poor. Altgeld was, centrally, envisioned as a city for children, a kind of paradise where young, low-income Chicago\n families could overcome poverty and model respectability. Throughout, I draw upon theories of utopian communities to argue that geographic and social isolation was the precondition for planners’ utopian imaginations, but that isolation has also, ironically, only exacerbated Altgeld’s\n problems over the decades. Altgeld thus offers an instructive case study, illustrating both the modernist hopes embedded in early public housing plans and their limitations. Unlike its whiter, more affluent suburban counterparts, Altgeld is a case study in what happens when communities are\n isolated by policy, rather than by choice.","PeriodicalId":36149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00047_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Altgeld Gardens is one of Chicago’s last remaining family public housing developments after the city’s large-scale conversion of public housing into mixed-income communities. Located at the far southern edge of the city, the community today is an island of poverty, disconnected from city services, jobs, amenities and even grocery stores. In this article, I draw on architectural plans and historic housing authority documents to demonstrate that Altgeld’s current condition is a far cry from how planners envisioned the community: as nothing short of a utopian housing development capable of supporting workers and their families and indeed, inculcating an ideal, modern citizen that would justify public investment in housing for the poor. Altgeld was, centrally, envisioned as a city for children, a kind of paradise where young, low-income Chicago families could overcome poverty and model respectability. Throughout, I draw upon theories of utopian communities to argue that geographic and social isolation was the precondition for planners’ utopian imaginations, but that isolation has also, ironically, only exacerbated Altgeld’s problems over the decades. Altgeld thus offers an instructive case study, illustrating both the modernist hopes embedded in early public housing plans and their limitations. Unlike its whiter, more affluent suburban counterparts, Altgeld is a case study in what happens when communities are isolated by policy, rather than by choice.
自成一体的城市:阿尔特盖尔德花园和公共住房的乌托邦
奥尔特盖尔德花园是芝加哥大规模将公共住房改造成混合收入社区后仅存的家庭公共住房开发项目之一。这个社区位于城市的最南端,今天是一个贫穷的岛屿,与城市服务、就业、便利设施甚至杂货店都脱节。在这篇文章中,我利用建筑规划和历史住房当局的文件来证明,Altgeld目前的状况与规划者对社区的设想相距甚远:作为一个乌托邦式的住房开发,能够支持工人和他们的家庭,实际上,灌输一个理想的现代公民,这将证明为穷人提供住房的公共投资是合理的。奥尔特盖尔德主要被设想为一个儿童之城,一个年轻的、低收入的芝加哥家庭可以克服贫困并成为受人尊敬的榜样的天堂。贯穿全书,我借鉴了乌托邦社区的理论,认为地理和社会隔离是规划者乌托邦想象的先决条件,但具有讽刺意味的是,这种隔离也加剧了几十年来奥尔特盖尔德的问题。因此,Altgeld提供了一个有指导意义的案例研究,说明了早期公共住房计划中嵌入的现代主义希望及其局限性。与更富裕的郊区白人社区不同,阿尔特盖尔德是一个研究社区因政策而非选择而被孤立时会发生什么的案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies
Journal of Urban Cultural Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信