Global Health Impact: Extending Access to Essential Medicines, Nicole Hassoun . Oxford University Press, 2020, xv + 301 pages.

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Erik Malmqvist
{"title":"Global Health Impact: Extending Access to Essential Medicines, Nicole Hassoun . Oxford University Press, 2020, xv + 301 pages.","authors":"Erik Malmqvist","doi":"10.1017/S0266267121000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global Health Impact is based on Hassoun’s broad and extensive scholarship on topics such as global justice, human rights, empirical philosophy and corporate responsibility, and her work as director of the Global Health Impact project (https://www.global-health-impact.org/new), a collaboration between academics and civil society organizations aimed at increasing access to essential medicines. [...]while Hassoun does not reject the global patent system as such, she contends that drug companies exploit this system in ways that violate people’s right to access to essential medicines, e.g. by aggressively extending and multiplying patent protections that keep drugs unaffordable in poor countries and by lobbying against compulsory licensing. [...]she argues that since drug companies contribute to, benefit from and are especially well-placed to address the access to medicines problem, they have a special obligation to address it, an obligation they currently fail to fulfil. [...]the chapter discusses how to collect evidence for other initiatives to improve access to medicines and advance global justice, and why empirical research needs philosophy (and not just the other way around).","PeriodicalId":51643,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Philosophy","volume":"38 1","pages":"158 - 164"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/S0266267121000134","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267121000134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Global Health Impact is based on Hassoun’s broad and extensive scholarship on topics such as global justice, human rights, empirical philosophy and corporate responsibility, and her work as director of the Global Health Impact project (https://www.global-health-impact.org/new), a collaboration between academics and civil society organizations aimed at increasing access to essential medicines. [...]while Hassoun does not reject the global patent system as such, she contends that drug companies exploit this system in ways that violate people’s right to access to essential medicines, e.g. by aggressively extending and multiplying patent protections that keep drugs unaffordable in poor countries and by lobbying against compulsory licensing. [...]she argues that since drug companies contribute to, benefit from and are especially well-placed to address the access to medicines problem, they have a special obligation to address it, an obligation they currently fail to fulfil. [...]the chapter discusses how to collect evidence for other initiatives to improve access to medicines and advance global justice, and why empirical research needs philosophy (and not just the other way around).
《全球健康影响:扩大获得基本药物的机会》,妮可·哈桑著。牛津大学出版社,2020,xv + 301页。
《全球健康影响》基于哈苏在全球正义、人权、实证哲学和企业责任等主题上的广泛学术成果,以及她作为全球健康影响项目主任的工作(https://www.global-health-impact.org/new),学术界和民间社会组织之间的合作,旨在增加获得基本药物的机会。[…]虽然Hassoun并不反对全球专利制度,但她认为,制药公司利用这一制度侵犯了人们获得基本药物的权利,例如,积极扩大和扩大专利保护,使贫穷国家无法负担药物,并游说反对强制许可。[…]她认为,由于制药公司为解决药品获取问题做出了贡献,从中受益,并且处于特别有利的地位,因此它们有特殊的义务来解决这一问题,而这是它们目前未能履行的义务。[…]本章讨论了如何为改善药品获取和促进全球正义的其他举措收集证据,以及为什么实证研究需要哲学(而不仅仅是相反)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The disciplines of economics and philosophy each possess their own special analytical methods, whose combination is powerful and fruitful. Each discipline can be enriched by the other. Economics and Philosophy aims to promote their mutual enrichment by publishing articles and book reviews in all areas linking these subjects. Topics include the methodology and epistemology of economics, the foundations of decision theory and game theory, the nature of rational choice in general, historical work on economics with a philosophical purpose, ethical issues in economics, the use of economic techniques in ethical theory, and many other subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信