Decoding, Fluency and Reading Comprehension: Examining the Nature of their Relationships in a Large-Scale Study with First Graders

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
J. Écalle, E. Dujardin, Christophe Gomes, Laurent Cros, A. Magnan
{"title":"Decoding, Fluency and Reading Comprehension: Examining the Nature of their Relationships in a Large-Scale Study with First Graders","authors":"J. Écalle, E. Dujardin, Christophe Gomes, Laurent Cros, A. Magnan","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2020.1846007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two large samples were assessed twice in Grade 1: the control group (Cont; N = 2302), which received no specific interventions, and the experimental group (Exp; N = 484), which received interventions associated with code-related skills (decoding and fluency). We estimated that a mean score of around 50 correctly read words per minute corresponded to a mean reading comprehension (RC) score. We then examined the relationships between decoding, fluency, RC and their associated skills, i.e. phonemic segmentation, vocabulary and listening comprehension. The causal nature of the links between decoding, fluency and RC was examined in two ways: hypothesized and experimental. Structural modeling showed that fluency was a good mediator variable between decoding and RC and explained RC. When we compared the Cont and Exp groups, the intervention had a positive effect on RC, even though linguistic comprehension was not stimulated. We conclude that fluency should be stimulated once decoding is efficient.","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"37 1","pages":"444 - 461"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846007","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2020.1846007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Abstract Two large samples were assessed twice in Grade 1: the control group (Cont; N = 2302), which received no specific interventions, and the experimental group (Exp; N = 484), which received interventions associated with code-related skills (decoding and fluency). We estimated that a mean score of around 50 correctly read words per minute corresponded to a mean reading comprehension (RC) score. We then examined the relationships between decoding, fluency, RC and their associated skills, i.e. phonemic segmentation, vocabulary and listening comprehension. The causal nature of the links between decoding, fluency and RC was examined in two ways: hypothesized and experimental. Structural modeling showed that fluency was a good mediator variable between decoding and RC and explained RC. When we compared the Cont and Exp groups, the intervention had a positive effect on RC, even though linguistic comprehension was not stimulated. We conclude that fluency should be stimulated once decoding is efficient.
解码、流利和阅读理解:在一项对一年级学生的大规模研究中考察它们之间的关系
在第1级对两个大样本进行了两次评估:对照组(Cont;N = 2302),实验组(Exp;N = 484),接受与代码相关技能(解码和流畅性)相关的干预。我们估计每分钟正确阅读50个单词的平均分数对应于平均阅读理解(RC)分数。然后,我们研究了解码、流利性、RC与其相关技能(即音位分割、词汇和听力理解)之间的关系。通过假设和实验两种方式考察了解码、流利性和RC之间的因果关系。结构模型分析表明,流利度是译码和解释型译码之间良好的中介变量。当我们比较Cont组和Exp组时,即使没有刺激语言理解,干预对RC也有积极的影响。我们的结论是,一旦解码有效,就应该刺激流利性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信