Parent Advocacy for Lives That Matter

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
B. Harry, Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg
{"title":"Parent Advocacy for Lives That Matter","authors":"B. Harry, Lydia Ocasio-Stoutenburg","doi":"10.1177/15407969211036442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article draws parallels between the concept of “Black lives matter” and the efforts of caregivers to advocate for the value of the lives of their children who have disabilities. The authors identify three key concepts that undergird their argument: first, the concept of systemic bias as built in to the hierarchical valuing of different disabilities and the role of this bias in the valuing of parents’ voices; second, the ways in which stigmatized identity markers intersect to intensify bias; and third, the authors propose a broad interpretation of the meaning of parent advocacy in which service providers seek to work as co-advocates rather than as professional advisors. The authors review relevant literature on these themes and also draw on their own experiences as women of color who are parents of children with disabilities. They present their exploration of these topics against the backdrop of the convergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter movement, and call on epistemological assumptions and intersectionality to address the question of whether participants’ perspectives on racism should be considered as “truth.”","PeriodicalId":47213,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211036442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article draws parallels between the concept of “Black lives matter” and the efforts of caregivers to advocate for the value of the lives of their children who have disabilities. The authors identify three key concepts that undergird their argument: first, the concept of systemic bias as built in to the hierarchical valuing of different disabilities and the role of this bias in the valuing of parents’ voices; second, the ways in which stigmatized identity markers intersect to intensify bias; and third, the authors propose a broad interpretation of the meaning of parent advocacy in which service providers seek to work as co-advocates rather than as professional advisors. The authors review relevant literature on these themes and also draw on their own experiences as women of color who are parents of children with disabilities. They present their exploration of these topics against the backdrop of the convergence of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Black Lives Matter movement, and call on epistemological assumptions and intersectionality to address the question of whether participants’ perspectives on racism should be considered as “truth.”
父母对重要生命的倡导
这篇文章将“黑人的生命很重要”的概念与照顾者倡导残疾儿童生命价值的努力进行了比较。作者确定了三个关键概念来支撑他们的论点:首先,系统偏见的概念是建立在对不同残疾的等级评估中的,以及这种偏见在评估父母声音中的作用;第二,污名化身份标记的交叉方式加剧了偏见;第三,作者对父母倡导的含义提出了广泛的解释,即服务提供者寻求作为共同倡导者而不是专业顾问工作。作者回顾了有关这些主题的相关文献,并借鉴了自己作为有色人种女性的经历,这些女性是残疾儿童的父母。他们在新冠肺炎大流行和“黑人的命也是命”运动融合的背景下对这些主题进行了探索,并呼吁采用认识论假设和交叉性来解决参与者对种族主义的观点是否应被视为“真相”的问题
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信