Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Michaela Waak MBBS FRACP, FCICM, MD , Joshua Laing MBBS FRACP BBiomedSci(hons) PhD , Lakshmi Nagarajan MBBS FRACP, MD , Nicholas Lawn MBChB, FRACP , A. Simon Harvey MBBS FRACP, MD
{"title":"Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective","authors":"Michaela Waak MBBS FRACP, FCICM, MD ,&nbsp;Joshua Laing MBBS FRACP BBiomedSci(hons) PhD ,&nbsp;Lakshmi Nagarajan MBBS FRACP, MD ,&nbsp;Nicholas Lawn MBChB, FRACP ,&nbsp;A. Simon Harvey MBBS FRACP, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This article aims to critically review the literature on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU) from an Australian and New Zealand perspective and provide recommendations for clinicians.</p></div><div><h3>Design and review methods</h3><p>A taskforce of adult and paediatric neurologists, selected by the Epilepsy Society of Australia, reviewed the literature on cEEG for seizure detection in critically ill neonates, children, and adults in the ICU. The literature on routine EEG and cEEG for other indications was not reviewed. Following an evaluation of the evidence and discussion of controversial issues, consensus was reached, and a document that highlighted important clinical, practical, and economic considerations regarding cEEG in Australia and New Zealand was drafted.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This review represents a summary of the literature and consensus opinion regarding the use of cEEG in the ICU for detection of seizures, highlighting gaps in evidence, practical problems with implementation, funding shortfalls, and areas for future research.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>While cEEG detects electrographic seizures in a significant proportion of at-risk neonates, children, and adults in the ICU, conferring poorer neurological outcomes and guiding treatment in many settings, the health economic benefits of treating such seizures remain to be proven. Presently, cEEG in Australian and New Zealand ICUs is a largely unfunded clinical resource that is subsequently reserved for the highest-impact patient groups. Wider adoption of cEEG requires further research into impact on functional and health economic outcomes, education and training of the neurology and ICU teams involved, and securement of the necessary resources and funding to support the service.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

This article aims to critically review the literature on continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring in the intensive care unit (ICU) from an Australian and New Zealand perspective and provide recommendations for clinicians.

Design and review methods

A taskforce of adult and paediatric neurologists, selected by the Epilepsy Society of Australia, reviewed the literature on cEEG for seizure detection in critically ill neonates, children, and adults in the ICU. The literature on routine EEG and cEEG for other indications was not reviewed. Following an evaluation of the evidence and discussion of controversial issues, consensus was reached, and a document that highlighted important clinical, practical, and economic considerations regarding cEEG in Australia and New Zealand was drafted.

Results

This review represents a summary of the literature and consensus opinion regarding the use of cEEG in the ICU for detection of seizures, highlighting gaps in evidence, practical problems with implementation, funding shortfalls, and areas for future research.

Conclusion

While cEEG detects electrographic seizures in a significant proportion of at-risk neonates, children, and adults in the ICU, conferring poorer neurological outcomes and guiding treatment in many settings, the health economic benefits of treating such seizures remain to be proven. Presently, cEEG in Australian and New Zealand ICUs is a largely unfunded clinical resource that is subsequently reserved for the highest-impact patient groups. Wider adoption of cEEG requires further research into impact on functional and health economic outcomes, education and training of the neurology and ICU teams involved, and securement of the necessary resources and funding to support the service.

重症监护病房的连续脑电图:从澳大利亚和新西兰的角度进行批判性回顾和立场声明
本文旨在从澳大利亚和新西兰的角度对重症监护病房(ICU)持续脑电图(cEEG)监测的文献进行批判性回顾,并为临床医生提供建议。设计和回顾方法:由澳大利亚癫痫学会挑选的一个成人和儿科神经科专家工作组,回顾了脑电图在ICU重症新生儿、儿童和成人中检测癫痫发作的文献。其他适应症的常规脑电图和脑电图的文献没有复习。在对证据进行评估和讨论有争议的问题后,达成了共识,并起草了一份文件,强调了澳大利亚和新西兰关于脑电图的重要临床、实践和经济考虑。结果本综述总结了关于在ICU中使用脑电图检测癫痫发作的文献和共识意见,突出了证据差距、实施中的实际问题、资金短缺和未来研究的领域。虽然脑电图检测到很大比例的高危新生儿、儿童和ICU成人的电图癫痫发作,但在许多情况下,神经学预后较差,并指导治疗,治疗此类癫痫发作的健康经济效益仍有待证实。目前,澳大利亚和新西兰icu的cEEG基本上是一个没有资金的临床资源,随后为影响最大的患者群体保留。更广泛地采用cEEG需要进一步研究对功能和健康经济结果的影响,对所涉及的神经病学和ICU团队的教育和培训,以及确保必要的资源和资金来支持这项服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信