Re-evaluating the evidence for late-surviving megafauna at Nombe rockshelter in the New Guinea highlands

IF 1.1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Gavin J. Prideaux, Isaac A. R. Kerr, Jacob D. van Zoelen, Rainer Grün, Sander van der Kaars, Annette Oertle, Katerina Douka, Elle Grono, Aleese Barron, Mary-Jane Mountain, Michael C. Westaway, Tim Denham
{"title":"Re-evaluating the evidence for late-surviving megafauna at Nombe rockshelter in the New Guinea highlands","authors":"Gavin J. Prideaux,&nbsp;Isaac A. R. Kerr,&nbsp;Jacob D. van Zoelen,&nbsp;Rainer Grün,&nbsp;Sander van der Kaars,&nbsp;Annette Oertle,&nbsp;Katerina Douka,&nbsp;Elle Grono,&nbsp;Aleese Barron,&nbsp;Mary-Jane Mountain,&nbsp;Michael C. Westaway,&nbsp;Tim Denham","doi":"10.1002/arco.5274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The causes of the Late Pleistocene extinction of most larger-bodied animals on the Australian continent have long been controversial. This is due, in no small part, to inadequate knowledge of exactly when these species were lost from different ecosystems. The Nombe rockshelter in the highlands of Papua New Guinea is one of very few sites on Sahul with as-yet-unrefuted evidence for the survival of megafaunal species until more recently than 40 thousand years (ka) ago. However, our understanding of the age of this site has been based on radiocarbon dating. Here we present new U–Th ages on large marsupial specimens from the deposit and identify a range of postcranial elements to species that include the diprotodontid <i>Hulitherium tomasettii</i>, kangaroo <i>Protemnodon tumbuna</i> and thylacine <i>Thylacinus cynocephalus</i>. Direct U–Th ages of 27–22 ka ago on faunal remains of <i>Protemnodon tumbuna</i> and another large unidentified macropodid are consistent with the existing radiocarbon chronology, yet are minimum ages due to the potential for post-depositional uptake of <sup>238</sup>U and stratigraphic reworking. Pollen analyses indicate perhumid, montane forests dominated by <i>Nothofagus</i> persisted, with minimal human disturbance from at least c.26–20 ka ago up to the terminal Pleistocene. Collagen fingerprinting (ZooMS) demonstrates the potential of protein-based identification of megafaunal remains at Nombe in the future. This study leaves open the possibility of extended coexistence between some megafaunal species in the montane rainforests of New Guinea and intermittently visiting groups of people, and underscores the need for further investigation of the Nombe deposit. Although preliminary, these findings reinforce the view that debates regarding megafaunal extinctions on Sahul require a greater appreciation of species-specific temporalities and the degrees of human impact on diverse habitats across the continent.</p>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"57 3","pages":"223-248"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.5274","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology in Oceania","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.5274","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The causes of the Late Pleistocene extinction of most larger-bodied animals on the Australian continent have long been controversial. This is due, in no small part, to inadequate knowledge of exactly when these species were lost from different ecosystems. The Nombe rockshelter in the highlands of Papua New Guinea is one of very few sites on Sahul with as-yet-unrefuted evidence for the survival of megafaunal species until more recently than 40 thousand years (ka) ago. However, our understanding of the age of this site has been based on radiocarbon dating. Here we present new U–Th ages on large marsupial specimens from the deposit and identify a range of postcranial elements to species that include the diprotodontid Hulitherium tomasettii, kangaroo Protemnodon tumbuna and thylacine Thylacinus cynocephalus. Direct U–Th ages of 27–22 ka ago on faunal remains of Protemnodon tumbuna and another large unidentified macropodid are consistent with the existing radiocarbon chronology, yet are minimum ages due to the potential for post-depositional uptake of 238U and stratigraphic reworking. Pollen analyses indicate perhumid, montane forests dominated by Nothofagus persisted, with minimal human disturbance from at least c.26–20 ka ago up to the terminal Pleistocene. Collagen fingerprinting (ZooMS) demonstrates the potential of protein-based identification of megafaunal remains at Nombe in the future. This study leaves open the possibility of extended coexistence between some megafaunal species in the montane rainforests of New Guinea and intermittently visiting groups of people, and underscores the need for further investigation of the Nombe deposit. Although preliminary, these findings reinforce the view that debates regarding megafaunal extinctions on Sahul require a greater appreciation of species-specific temporalities and the degrees of human impact on diverse habitats across the continent.

Abstract Image

重新评估新几内亚高地诺贝岩洞中晚期存活的巨型动物的证据
澳大利亚大陆上大多数大型动物在更新世晚期灭绝的原因一直存在争议。这在很大程度上是由于对这些物种从不同生态系统中消失的确切时间的了解不足。巴布亚新几内亚高地上的诺贝岩洞是萨胡尔岛上为数不多的几个遗址之一,直到最近的4万多年前,这里还存在着巨型动物物种的生存证据。然而,我们对这个遗址年龄的了解是基于放射性碳定年法。在这里,我们对该沉积物中的大型有袋动物标本进行了新的U-Th年龄测定,并确定了一系列颅后元素,包括双原齿类Hulitherium tomasettii,袋鼠Protemnodon tumbuna和袋狼Thylacinus cynocephalus。巨足动物遗骸27 ~ 22 ka前的直接U-Th年龄与现有的放射性碳年代学一致,但由于沉积后可能吸收238U和地层改造,这是最小年龄。花粉分析表明,从至少c.26-20 ka到更新世末期,以Nothofagus为主导的过湿润山地森林持续存在,人类干扰最小。胶原蛋白指纹图谱(ZooMS)显示了未来在诺贝巨型动物遗骸中基于蛋白质的鉴定的潜力。这项研究为新几内亚山地雨林中的一些巨型动物物种与间歇性来访的人群之间延长共存的可能性敞开了大门,并强调了对Nombe矿床进行进一步调查的必要性。虽然是初步的,但这些发现强化了这样一种观点,即关于Sahul上巨型动物灭绝的争论需要对物种特定的时间和人类对整个大陆不同栖息地的影响程度有更大的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Archaeology in Oceania is published online and in print versions three times a year: April, July, October. It accepts articles and research reports in prehistoric and historical archaeology, modern material culture and human biology of ancient and modern human populations. Its primary geographic focus is Australia, the islands of the Pacific Ocean and lands of the western Pacific rim. All articles and research reports accepted as being within the remit of the journal and of appropriate standard will be reviewed by two scholars; authors will be informed of these comments though not necessarily of the reviewer’s names.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信