Do cognitive and physical effort costs affect choice behavior similarly?

Abstract

Performing an action often incurs a cost, such as exerting effort for a reward. Previous studies used the Effort Expenditure for Reward Task (EEfRT) to show devaluation of reward with physical effort. However, it is unclear if a similarly structured attentional task would produce a similar devaluation with cognitive effort. In the present work, we propose a new task called the “shell game task” (SGT) as a cognitive effort-based decision-making paradigm. Participants performed both the EEfRT and SGT in a within-subject design. Using computational models of choice behavior, we showed that effort cost induced by the variability of task demands in the SGT is similar to the effort cost from the existing EEfRT in the devaluation of a given outcome in action choice selection. This result suggests that effort cost may be a stable idiosyncratic trait across the two tasks and shows how computational approaches can be used to estimate and compare measures of effort. In addition, the results suggest that the SGT can be used as an alternative to the EEfRT with subject populations with motor deficits.