Why 3D in vitro cancer models are the future of cancer research?

Pub Date : 2023-05-05 DOI:10.18054/pb.v124i3-4.24697
Tina Petrić, M. Sabol
{"title":"Why 3D in vitro cancer models are the future of cancer research?","authors":"Tina Petrić, M. Sabol","doi":"10.18054/pb.v124i3-4.24697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tumors are three-dimensional (3D) entities characterized by complex structural architecture which is necessary for adequate intercellular, intracellular and cell-to-matrix interactions among the aberrant cells in cancer. In the field of cancer research, 2D cell cultures are traditionally used for decades in the majority of experiments. The reasons for this are the vast benefits these models provide, including simplicity and cost effectiveness. However, it is now known that these models are exposed to much higher stiffness, they lose physiological extracellular matrix (ECM) on artificial plastic surfaces as well as differentiation, polarization and cell-cell communication. This leads to the loss of crucial cellular signaling pathways and changes in cell responses to stimuli when compared to in vivo conditions. Moreover, they cannot adequately mimic the complexity and dynamic interactions of the tumor microenvironment (TME) which is of great importance in anticancer drug treatments. 3D models seem more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers because they offer the opportunity to model the cancer mass together with its environment which seems the key factor in promoting and directing cancer invasion. 3D cell culture with its additional dimensionality makes the difference in cellular responses because it influences the spatial and physical aspects of the cells in 3D culture. This affects the signal transduction and makes the behavior of 3D-cultured cells more physiologically relevant and reflective of in vivo cellular responses. This review focuses on major differences between 2D and 3D cell cultures, highlighting the importance of considering bioengineering humanized 3D cancer models as the future in cancer research. Additionally, it presents diverse 3D models currently used in cancer research, outlining their benefits and limitations. Precisely, this review highlights the differences between the 3D models with the focus on tumor stroma interactions, cell population and extracellular matrix composition providing methods and examples for each model from the studies done so far.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18054/pb.v124i3-4.24697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tumors are three-dimensional (3D) entities characterized by complex structural architecture which is necessary for adequate intercellular, intracellular and cell-to-matrix interactions among the aberrant cells in cancer. In the field of cancer research, 2D cell cultures are traditionally used for decades in the majority of experiments. The reasons for this are the vast benefits these models provide, including simplicity and cost effectiveness. However, it is now known that these models are exposed to much higher stiffness, they lose physiological extracellular matrix (ECM) on artificial plastic surfaces as well as differentiation, polarization and cell-cell communication. This leads to the loss of crucial cellular signaling pathways and changes in cell responses to stimuli when compared to in vivo conditions. Moreover, they cannot adequately mimic the complexity and dynamic interactions of the tumor microenvironment (TME) which is of great importance in anticancer drug treatments. 3D models seem more biomimetic compared to 2D cell monolayers because they offer the opportunity to model the cancer mass together with its environment which seems the key factor in promoting and directing cancer invasion. 3D cell culture with its additional dimensionality makes the difference in cellular responses because it influences the spatial and physical aspects of the cells in 3D culture. This affects the signal transduction and makes the behavior of 3D-cultured cells more physiologically relevant and reflective of in vivo cellular responses. This review focuses on major differences between 2D and 3D cell cultures, highlighting the importance of considering bioengineering humanized 3D cancer models as the future in cancer research. Additionally, it presents diverse 3D models currently used in cancer research, outlining their benefits and limitations. Precisely, this review highlights the differences between the 3D models with the focus on tumor stroma interactions, cell population and extracellular matrix composition providing methods and examples for each model from the studies done so far.
分享
查看原文
为什么三维体外癌症模型是癌症研究的未来?
肿瘤是三维(3D)实体,其特征是复杂的结构结构,这是癌症中异常细胞之间充分的细胞间、细胞内和细胞与基质相互作用所必需的。在癌症研究领域,二维细胞培养传统上在大多数实验中使用了几十年。这样做的原因是这些模型提供了巨大的好处,包括简单性和成本效益。然而,现在已知这些模型暴露在更高的刚度下,它们失去了人造塑料表面的生理细胞外基质(ECM),以及分化、极化和细胞间通讯。与体内条件相比,这导致关键细胞信号通路的丧失和细胞对刺激反应的变化。此外,它们不能充分模拟肿瘤微环境(TME)的复杂性和动态相互作用,而TME在抗癌药物治疗中非常重要。与2D单层细胞相比,3D模型似乎更具有仿生性,因为它们提供了模拟癌症肿块及其环境的机会,而环境似乎是促进和指导癌症侵袭的关键因素。具有额外维度的3D细胞培养使细胞反应产生差异,因为它影响3D培养中细胞的空间和物理方面。这影响了信号转导,使3d培养细胞的行为更具有生理相关性,并反映了体内细胞的反应。本文综述了2D和3D细胞培养的主要区别,强调了将生物工程人性化3D癌症模型作为未来癌症研究的重要性。此外,它还介绍了目前在癌症研究中使用的各种3D模型,概述了它们的优点和局限性。准确地说,这篇综述强调了3D模型之间的差异,重点是肿瘤基质相互作用、细胞群和细胞外基质组成,为迄今为止所做的研究中的每种模型提供了方法和示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信